80 likes | 173 Views
Learning Communities and Repositories: Underpinning the Vision. Dr. Anoush Margaryan Caledonian Academy Glasgow Caledonian University, UK anoush.margaryan@gcal.ac.uk. Vision. Learning Object Economy Creating and sharing resources locally and globally
E N D
Learning Communities and Repositories: Underpinning the Vision Dr. Anoush Margaryan Caledonian Academy Glasgow Caledonian University, UK anoush.margaryan@gcal.ac.uk ALT-C 2006 Conference Symposium 981 “Would you Care to Share?” September 6, 2006
Vision • Learning Object Economy • Creating and sharing resources locally and globally • Collaborating with peers across boundaries • Communities coalescing around LORs • Transformation of learning practices • Enhancement of learning experience ALT-C 2006 Conference Symposium 981 “Would you Care to Share?” September 6, 2006
And the reality? • Learning Object economy not achieved • Technology push rather than pedagogy pull • “People in their contexts make it complicated” (Collis and Moonen, 2005) • Misalignment with users’ needs and contexts ALT-C 2006 Conference Symposium 981 “Would you Care to Share?” September 6, 2006
Barriers Socio-cultural Pedagogic Organisational and info management Technological Margaryan, Currier, Littlejohn, & Nicol (2006) http://www.academy.gcal.ac.uk/cd-lor/learningcommunitiesreport.pdf • Cultural preferences and expectations related to sharing, collaboration, hierarchies and roles within communities, HCI, culture of disciplines and sectors • Decontextualisation, user skills and information literacy, loss of educational narrative, diversity of pedagogic approaches in communities • Lack of alignment with organisational strategy, need for new management processes, incentives, information management (IPR, DRM, metadata) • Reference models, database technology, technology for services, interoperability with others LORs and tools used by communities ALT-C 2006 Conference Symposium 981 “Would you Care to Share?” September 6, 2006
LOR Communities Types of communities 1. Learning-oriented communities 2. Research-oriented communities 3. Work-oriented, communities of practice 4. Hobby-oriented communities of interest/ fantasy Seufert, Moisseeva & Steinbeck (2001) Community dimensions 1. Purpose 2. Dialogue 3. Roles and responsibilities 4. Coherence –close-knit or loosely confederated/ transient 5. Context 6. Rules 7. Pedagogy Margaryan et. al (2006) ALT-C 2006 Conference Symposium 981 “Would you Care to Share?” September 6, 2006
Dimensions of LORs Purpose – types of resources exchanged; preservation of materials; sharing of resources Subject area or discipline Scope - departmental, institutional, regional, national, or international Educational sector - school, higher education, further education, lifelong learning Contributors - teachers, students, publishers, support staff, projects Business model - business, trading and management framework underpinning repository ALT-C 2006 Conference Symposium 981 “Would you Care to Share?” September 6, 2006
Linking LORs, communities, issues, and solutions LORs JORUM SIESWE IVIMEDS Spoken Word Aberdeen University University of Ireland Galway UHI Millennium Institute LORE LOR dimensions Purpose Discipline Scope Sector Contributor Business model Community dimensions Purpose Dialogue Roles Coherence Context Rules Pedagogy Issues Cultural Pedagogic Organisatio-nal Technologi-cal Solutions Cultural Pedagogic Organisatio-nal Technologi-cal ALT-C 2006 Conference Symposium 981 “Would you Care to Share?” September 6, 2006
Prerequisites for success • LORs should only be introduced if they are a solution to a problem meaningful to users • Design of LORs should be based on needs of the communities • Product innovation should involve process innovation • LORs linked to institutional and national strategies for teaching and learning • Demonstrated impact and added value for users ALT-C 2006 Conference Symposium 981 “Would you Care to Share?” September 6, 2006