380 likes | 588 Views
Introduction: structure of the lectures. Definitions Chronology Analysis. Definitions 1. Imperialism: process through which a state attempts to control the economic and/or political and cultural makeup of another state.
E N D
Introduction: structure of the lectures • Definitions • Chronology • Analysis
Definitions 1 • Imperialism: process through which a state attempts to control the economic and/or political and cultural makeup of another state. • Colonialism: the most developed form of Imperialism whereby the controlling state invades another state/region so as to exploit its resources and/or for the purposes of large-scale immigration • Colonialism: extension of territorial control • through either settler colonies or administrative dependencies: indigenous pop. (in)directly ruled or displaced • Imperialism: extension of political control • policy of extending control over foreign entities to acquire and/or maintain empires • Colonialism is one way of achieving more general goal of imperialism
Definitions 2 • Colony • Territory under direct political control through the extension of a state’s sovereignty over territory beyond its original borders. • Cf. Dependent Territory: formally cedes part of its sovereignty • Protectorate • P. established through formal agreement placing one state in an unequal relationship with another. The latter ‘protects’ the former (diplomatically, militarily), which accepts specified obligations. • N.B.: UK often also controlled local government. • Condominium • Arrangement in which two (or more) states share sovereignty over a third. E.g. Anglo-Egyptian Sudan (1899-1956)
Definitions 3: Mandates & Trusts (20th Century) • Mandates (post WWI) • Def.: League of Nations Covenant (Art. 22) disposes of territories of Ottoman & German Empires defeated in WWI. • Mandates justified with necessary transitional period to ‘prepare’ for independence. • Only Mandatory territory still not independent: Palestine • Trusts (post WII) • UN Charter (ch. 11-13) establishes control of “non self-governing territories” intended to “promote the welfare of the native inhabitants, and advance them toward self-government.” • N.B. Justification for Trusts virtually identical to that for Mandates!
Colonialism and the ‘Imperial Age’ • Process was both extensive (in many parts of the world) and intensive • Where: European Empires in the Americas, South and South East Asia, and Africa • Who: Spain, Portugal, Britain, France, Holland, Belgium and to a certain extent Germany and Italy • When: era of exploration from the late 15th Century - colonial empires reach their peak in the 19th Century, formal independence comes mostly after WW2. • How: underpinned by superior military might and apparatus for control – threat and use of violence never far from the surface • Why: motivated by economic interests (new materials to be exploited)
Types of Colonial Rule • 1. Economic Companies: East India Trading Co./VOC/ French trading co. • European nations allowed the establishment of private companies that were granted large territories to administrate in the target country • Companies set up own systems of taxation & labour recruitment. • European powers who provided chartersfor these companies • companies took responsibility for all of the expenses related to establishing & administering the colonies. • European countries political benefit of having additional colonies, but not the expense
Types of Colonial Rule 1. Economic Companies (cont.) • Companies took responsibility for all of the expenses related to establishing & administering the colonies. • European countries: political benefit of having additional colonies in Africa, but not the expense • companies were eventually unsuccessful in that they were unable to generate consistent profits for their shareholders. Governing a colony was expensive. • By 1924, all Company rule was replaced by various forms of European colonial governance
Types of Colonial Rule 2. Direct Rule • French, Belgians, Germans, & Portuguese in governing African colonies. • Centralised administrations (usually in urban centres) , that stressed policies of assimilation. • Colonialists’ intention of "civilising" African societies so they would be more like Europe. • As part of this strategy, colonialists did not try to negotiate governance with indigenous rulers & governments. • Indigenous authorities- subordinate place in these administrations. • Direct rule also used the strategy of "divide and rule" by implementing policies that intentionally weakened indigenous power networks & institutions
Types of Colonial Rule 3. Indirect Rule • British used indirect rule to govern their colonies. • This system of governance used indigenous rulers within the colonial administration, although they often maintained an inferior role. • More cooperative model than direct rule • Indirect rule increased divisions between ethnic groups & gave power to certain "big men" who had never had it before in pre-colonial history. • Consequences of these significant changes in social organisation & identity are still being felt today
Types of Colonial Rule 4. Settler Rule • Settler rule refers to the type of colonialism (mainly in southern Africa) in which European settlers imposed direct rule on their colonies. • Settler colonies differed from other colonies- a significant number of immigrants from Europe settled in these colonies.
Types of Colonial Rule 4. Settler Rule (continued) • To thrive in the colonies, settlers demanded special political & economic rights, & protection. • Security & prosperity for settlers depended on economic exploitation & political oppression of the population that vastly outnumbered the settlers. • Consequently, settler rule was characterised by its harsh policies toward indigenous populations.
Types of Colonial Rule 4. Settler Rule (continued) • Southern Africa: South Africa, Southern & Northern Rhodesia (Zimbabwe & Zambia), Angola, Mozambique, & South West Africa (Namibia). • Settlers from Holland, Britain, Germany, & Portugal colonised these areas. • in Algeria, French colony in North Africa. • Australia, New Zealand, North America
Chronology: 15th-17th Century • Spain & Portugal divide world: Treaty of Torsedillas (1494) • Portugal: trader colonialism • Informal, settlements/outposts • coast of Africa & Asia; • 1st & longest-lived global empire (1415-1999). • Spain: settler colonialism • try to assimilate local cultures deeper impact • South & Central America • Debate: Do Amerindians have souls…?…or rights? (slavery!) Portuguese Empire at height, 16th C Spanish Empire at height, 1790
Chronology: 18th Century • The Netherlands • trader C: Dutch Indies Trading Cos., followed by state • Rise in patriotism (struggle against Spain) • Britain • Migration: wars of religion start ‘afresh’ (N.Am.) • Slave trade: agricultural economies (sugar, cotton, tobacco) • Gain: New France (1760), Aus. (1788), NZ (1840) • Lose American colonies (1776-83) • 1757: UK E. India Co. conquers Bengal Dutch Empire, 18th Century • France: Fall of 1st Empire • …Rise of Nationalism (1789+) • Industrial Revolution ‘First’ British Empire, 1760
Chronology: 19th Century • Scramble for Africa • ‘Long Depression’ (1873-96) + protectionism↑ • African markets solve deficits • Increasing strategic rivalries • …Informal formal col. • Britain: mass migration • India: 1857 ‘Mutiny’ direct rule • Africa: ‘Cape to Cairo’ • Divide & Rule: Ireland, India, Zimbabwe, Uganda, Iraq • France • Algeria 1830 (settler/assimilation) • Indochina, French Africa British Empire, 1921 French Empires: First Empire (■15th-18th C) and Second (■19th-20th C)
Chronology: 20th Century • UK, France, and WWI • Ottoman fall: Sykes-Picot, 1916 • League of Nations: • Liberal discourse, Colonial Practices… • …Revolutionary consequences (soon) • Italy: Libya, Eritrea, Somalia • Fascism & Roman Empire • Japan: ‘Co-Prosperity Sphere’ • Econ. & ideological reasons • ‘anti-imperial imperialism’ • WW2…beginning of end… • United Nations Trusteeship Council League of Nations Mandates, 1920
Military dimensions of Empire • Superiority in military technology is vital, as it allows force projection, and thus leverage: • extract and enforce favourable terms of trade (e.g. ‘Capitulations’) • control vastly superior numbers of native inhabitants. • Naval technology: Control of the seas: Spain & Portugal (15-17th C); Ned., UK, France (18thC) • e.g.: importance of Suez Canal • Industrial revolution military technology (cannons, repeat rifles, coal- & oil-powered commercial & military navies) & mass production capacity • UK, France
Economic role of Colonies • trader colonialism: metropolitan states drawn in to protect ‘terms of trade’ (i.e. trading companies’ profits) • Slavery: settler colonialism relied on ‘cheap’ labour, either subjugated locals or ‘imported’ slaves • Trading companies: Granted monopolies by metropole, had own armed forces and independent foreign policy • E.g.: UK’s East India Trading Company • re-structuring local economies • provide raw materials (e.g. Egyptian & American cotton, Caribbean sugar) or luxury goods (S. American gold, Chinese opium) • provide markets for metropolitan economies (Sheffield textile mills) • fund local elites’ reform (Muhammad ’Ali’s new Egyptian army) • Economics, poverty and revolution • industrialisation (urbanisation & pauperisation) = increase in inequality social & political tensions • E.g.: Egypt 19-20C, Iran under Shah
Religion: Missionaries in 19th century • Relationship between colonialism & religion: • Missionaries opposed the more cruel aspects of colonialism but they did support their country’s role in target country. • This legitimised colonial rule • To spread Christianity • To civilise natives
French Colonialism • Meaning of Assimilation • Direct Rule • Use of Traditional Authorities as French Administrators • Replacement of Traditional Authorities by Soldiers • In Practice Assimilation was Association • British and French administrative Practice not that different in rural Africa
French Colonialism • The Concept of Permanent Association • Goal a French Language Union (Political Economic and Social) • Paris and A Single, highly centralized system- World Wide • Facade of Direct Rule
French Colonial Structures France Overseas: Indochina, Caribbean North Africa: Tunisia, Morocco, the Department of Algeria L’Afrique Occidentale Francaise (AOF) L’Afrique Equitoriale Francaise (AEF) The Mandates: Togo, Cameroons
French Decolonisation • The Concept of the French Union • France and World War II: French Africa and Vichy • Socialist Governments and Socialist Empires • Collapse of Federation, the Loi Cadre of 1956 • DeGaulle and the 1958 Referendum
Political impact of Colonialism • Arbitrary boundaries: historically separate, if not antagonistic cultures, languages, ethnicities and political systems • E.g.: Lebanon, Nigeria, Maghreb, Afghanistan –cf. Kurdistan’s split • Loss of ‘experience’: robbed of organic political development for centuries • Strategies of rule • divide & rule internal divisions both before and after independence • India, Iraq • Assimilation (settler colonialism, longer-term effects on indigenous cultures) • Algeria, North & South America, Australia, Southern Africa • Association (trading outposts, shorter-term effects) • Macao
Dilemmas/ambiguities of ‘modernity’ • How to separate ‘modernity’ from Westernisation and ‘Westoxification’ (cultural imperialism)? • Loss of language and values – can they be retrieved after centuries? • ‘Modernisation’ equated with ‘Westernisation’, and used as excuse for domination by colonial powers and local elites… • E.g. Iranian Revolution, ‘Beijing consensus’
How was colonialism justified by invaders in ‘moral’ terms? • Racial arguments: were native populations subhuman/less human? No moral obligations (e.g.slavery) • Religious arguments: non-Christians were worth less in the eyes of God and they had less moral worth • Cultural arguments: inferior cultures would benefit from influence of superior ones: colonialism carried a ‘civilising mission’
Conclusion • Timeline • From trade to settlement and industry • Self determination (UN) is a recent concept • Hidden world history? • History written by the victors of colonialism, myths of the benefits of colonialism, silenced voices of the colonised • Aspects & Consequences • Military, Economic, Political legacies are clear: will become apparent in later parts of the course • The Contradictions of Decolonisation... • Decolonisation is successful but emancipation is partial • Is colonialism replaced by a more subtle form of Neo-Imperialism?
IR1001 – Week 2Colonialism Dr. C. Heristchi F43 EWB, c.heristchi@abdn.ac.uk Consultation times: Wednesdays 10am-noon