1 / 29

AE Senior Thesis

Advanced Individual Training A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA. AE Senior Thesis. Natalie Bockhorst│Construction Management Chimay Anumba , PhD. PE. Presentation Outline Project Overview Analysis #1: SIPS Architectural Breadth Structural Breadth Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts

miron
Download Presentation

AE Senior Thesis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Advanced Individual Training A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA AE Senior Thesis Natalie Bockhorst│Construction Management ChimayAnumba, PhD. PE

  2. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Architectural Breadth • Structural Breadth • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Analysis #4: Modularization • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Advanced Individual Training A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  3. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Architectural Breadth • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Analysis #4: Modularization • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Project Overview Advanced Individual Training A.I.T. Barracks Fort Eustis, VA A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  4. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Problem Identification • Durations • Typical Sequencing • SIPS • Recommendation • Architectural Breadth • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Analysis #4: Modularization • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Analysis #1 Short Interval Production Schedule: Masonry Façade Work • Problem Identification: • Unforeseen conditions • Mortar time consternate concerning precast elements • Limited scaffolding A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  5. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Problem Identification • Durations • Typical Sequencing • SIPS • Recommendation • Architectural Breadth • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Analysis #4: Modularization • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Analysis #1 Short Interval Production Schedule: Masonry Façade Work B A C D A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  6. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Problem Identification • Durations • Typical Sequencing • SIPS • Recommendation • Architectural Breadth • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Analysis #4: Modularization • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Analysis #1 Short Interval Production Schedule: Masonry Façade Work A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  7. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Problem Identification • Durations • Typical Sequencing • SIPS • Recommendation • Architectural Breadth • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Analysis #4: Modularization • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Analysis #1 Short Interval Production Schedule: Masonry Façade Work A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  8. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Problem Identification • Durations • Typical Sequencing • SIPS • Recommendation • Architectural Breadth • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Analysis #4: Modularization • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Analysis #1 Short Interval Production Schedule: Masonry Façade Work Cost Reduction: 1.Labor 2. Equipment It is recommended to use a SIPS for the Masonry Façade Work A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  9. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Architectural Breadth • Original Brick Veneer Elevations • New Precast Façade Elevations • Comparison • Recommendation • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Analysis #4: Modularization • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Architectural Breadth Original Brick Veneer Elevations Original Brick Veneer Elevations East Elevation North Elevation West Elevation South Elevation A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  10. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Architectural Breadth • Original Brick Veneer Elevations • New Precast Façade Elevations • Comparison • Recommendation • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Analysis #4: Modularization • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Architectural Breadth New Precast Façade Elevations New Precast Façade Elevations East Elevation North Elevation West Elevation South Elevation A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  11. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Architectural Breadth • Original Brick Veneer Elevations • New Precast Façade Elevations • Comparison • Recommendation • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Analysis #4: Modularization • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Architectural Breadth New Precast Façade Elevations Original Brick Veneer Elevations North Elevation North Elevation South Elevation South Elevation A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  12. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Architectural Breadth • Original Brick Veneer Elevations • New Precast Façade Elevations • Comparison • Recommendation • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Analysis #4: Modularization • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Architectural Breadth New Precast Façade Elevations Original Brick Veneer Elevations East Elevation East Elevation West Elevation West Elevation A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  13. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Architectural Breadth • Original Brick Veneer Elevations • New Precast Façade Elevations • Comparison • Recommendation • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Analysis #4: Modularization • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Architectural Breadth It is recommended to use a Precast Concrete Façade A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  14. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Architectural Breadth • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Problem Identification • Design Build vs. Integrated Project Delivery • Risk Analysis Matrix • Recommendations • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Analysis #4: Modularization • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Analysis # 2: Comparing Contracts and Evaluating the Risk • Problem Identification: • Design Build Contract Approach • Industry Issue A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  15. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Architectural Breadth • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Problem Identification • Design Build vs. Integrated Project Delivery • Risk Analysis Matrix • Recommendations • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Analysis #4: Modularization • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Analysis # 2: Comparing Contracts and Evaluating the Risk A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  16. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Architectural Breadth • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Problem Identification • Design Build vs. Integrated Project Delivery • Risk Analysis Matrix • Recommendations • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Analysis #4: Modularization • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Analysis # 2: Comparing Contracts and Evaluating the Risk When evaluating risk, risk can be defined as the likelihood (probability) versus consequences. Setting up the acceptable level of risk in various areas, likelihood of proposed scenarios and acceptability of their consequences can be illustrated in the form of a matrix A141 C195 High Risk Medium Risk Low Risk A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  17. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Architectural Breadth • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Problem Identification • Design Build vs. Integrated Project Delivery • Risk Analysis Matrix • Recommendations • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Analysis #4: Modularization • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Analysis # 2: Comparing Contracts and Evaluating the Risk It is not recommended to use an IPD Approach A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  18. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Architectural Breadth • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Problem Identification • Flow Charts • Last Planner • Recommendations • Analysis #4: Modularization • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Analysis #3 Schedule Acceleration Techniques • Problem Identification: • Unforeseen conditions • Site work moved to critical path A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  19. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Architectural Breadth • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Problem Identification • Flow Charts • Last Planner • Recommendations • Analysis #4: Modularization • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Analysis #3 Schedule Acceleration Techniques A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  20. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Architectural Breadth • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Problem Identification • Flow Charts • Last Planner • Recommendations • Analysis #4: Modularization • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Analysis #3 Schedule Acceleration Techniques The process for creating the weekly work plans will be as followed: Monday – Update the project schedule Tuesday – Develop the future schedule Wednesday – Update the schedule if necessary Thursday – Distribute the weekly work plan for the following week to foremen, so they can prepare for the next weeks work A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  21. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Architectural Breadth • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Problem Identification • Flow Charts • Last Planner • Recommendations • Analysis #4: Modularization • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Analysis #3 Schedule Acceleration Techniques It is recommended to use the Last Planner A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  22. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Architectural Breadth • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Analysis #4: Modularization • Problem Identification • Schedule Impact • Areas of Modularization • Financial Feasibility • Recommendations • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Analysis #4: Analyzing the Effects of Modularization • Problem Identification: • Repetitive and standardized building • Reduce schedule A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  23. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Architectural Breadth • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Analysis #4: Modularization • Problem Identification • Schedule Impact • Areas of Modularization • Financial Feasibility • Recommendations • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Analysis #4: Analyzing the Effects of Modularization Modular Construction Schedule On-Site Construction Schedule Light Steel Framing with Modular Bathroom Units Schedule A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  24. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Architectural Breadth • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Analysis #4: Modularization • Problem Identification • Schedule Impact • Areas of Modularization • Financial Feasibility • Recommendations • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Analysis #4: Analyzing the Effects of Modularization 12’ - 8 1/8” 28’- 7 ¼” Typical Room Enlarged Partial First Floor Plan – West Wing A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  25. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Architectural Breadth • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Analysis #4: Modularization • Problem Identification • Schedule Impact • Areas of Modularization • Financial Feasibility • Recommendations • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Analysis #4: Analyzing the Effects of Modularization Benefits Controlled factory environment Cost Savings Modular units are built on a flat surface Average 50% schedule savings There is less of a disturbance on site Standardized design Low waste Environmentally friendly construction process Crane Placement and Working Radius Plan A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  26. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Architectural Breadth • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Analysis #4: Modularization • Problem Identification • Schedule Impact • Areas of Modularization • Financial Feasibility • Recommendations • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Analysis #4: Analyzing the Effects of Modularization Problems Double Walls Continual Vapor Barrier Installation Insulation Water Infiltration Roof Logistics It is not recommended to use Modularization A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  27. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Architectural Breadth • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Analysis #4: Modularization • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Final Recommendations • Analysis #1: SIPS • SIPS is Recommended • Analysis #2: Contract Comparison • IPD is not Recommended • Analysis #3 Schedule Acceleration • The Last Planner is Recommended • Analysis #4 Modularization • Modularization is not Recommended A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  28. Presentation Outline • Project Overview • Analysis #1: SIPS • Architectural Breadth • Analysis #2: Comparing Contracts • Analysis #3: Schedule Acceleration • Analysis #4: Modularization • Final Recommendations • Acknowledgements Acknowledgements Friends and Family AE Faculty Advisor: Dr. Anumba Balfour Beatty Construction Project Team U.S. Army Corps Project Team PACE Industry Members A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

  29. Questions? A.I.T. Barracks │Fort Eustis, VA │ Natalie Bockhorst │ CM

More Related