1 / 11

Construction Safety

Construction Safety. M. Scharfenstein - ES&H Coordinator 14 May 2009. Project ISM Process & Implementation Civil Construction Technical Systems Installations Lab shops, subcontractors and collaborators Commissioning w/ transition to Operations = ARR’s Safety Assessment Document

mistij
Download Presentation

Construction Safety

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Construction Safety M. Scharfenstein - ES&H Coordinator 14 May 2009

  2. Project ISM Process & Implementation • Civil Construction • Technical Systems Installations • Lab shops, subcontractors and collaborators • Commissioning w/ transition to Operations = ARR’s • Safety Assessment Document • Accelerator Safety Envelope • Experience • Overall and detail statistics • Construction and Installation experience • Lessons Learned • Direct subcontractor management • Detailed work planning • Previous Review Recommendations

  3. Project-specific ISEMS Implementation • SLAC Integrated Safety Management Plan • SLAC Work Planning and Control • Formerly LCLS Work Authorization Procedure • Scope / Hazard & Control documentation / Authorization / Release • SLAC ES&H Manual • Formerly LCLS Project ES&H Plan • GC/sub Site Specific Safety Plan • Job Safety Analysis • Daily Tailgate Safety Meetings • PM/UTR manages each subcontract • CF-5 / Continuous Improvement / Lessons Learned

  4. PROJECT SAFETY EXPERIENCEThrough March 2009 DART Rate • Total Project Hours • 2.16 M Hours worked • DART Rate 1.03 • SubContractors • 597 K Hours worked • DART Rate 3.02 (9 Incidents) • TRC Rate 4.02 (3 Incidents) • LCLS Collaboration • 1,566 K Hours worked • DART Rate 0.26 (2 Incidents) Injury rates based on 200 K hours (100 man years) of effort.DOE/SC Goal is a Reportable Case (TRC) rate of < 0.25 and a Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred (DART) rate < 0.65 per 100 FTEs.

  5. CF & Technical Systems Stewardship • Excellent Safety Record • 120K+ hours w/o injury (TRC or DART) • S20, MMF, Injector, Linac TSI, S522, LTU • Project Managers / UTRs / Installation Managers • Direct management of subcontractors • Communicate ES&H Expectations • Guide them to success • Enforcement when needed • Thorough Work Planning and Control • Aggressive ISM management • Issues identified and addressed immediately • Positive Results • Ownership of safety

  6. CF CMGC Stewardship • October ’06 thru April ’07 Ramp Up to Full Production : Procedural Violations • Stand Down of Construction Activities : All Hands Meeting • Review of Work Planning Process for field work – JSA process inadequate • PMT changes • Deficiency Notices • May ’07 thru November ’07 Full Production : DARTs • Multi-day Stand Down of Construction Activities : Corrective Action Plan • Paperwork ineffectively utilized by CM/GC and trade contractors • PMT changes • Deficiency Notices & Fines • Communication with Corporate TCCo • Safety Stewardship Committee Established • Full time on-site medic (+30hr OSHA) • UTRs added • December ’07 thru April ’08 : Some progress, then… • Two DARTs associated with one sub • PM removed • Work stopped • May ’08 thru December ’08 : No DARTs • Effective work planning & execution sought • Plan for joint observation developed • Attendance at daily morning work planning meetings • JSA review with workers throughout the day • Identification / monitoring of specific trades or tasks for safe work practices • Must communicate with the worker

  7. Lessons Learned • CM/GC and/or subcontractor selection criteria • Assessment of EMR and competencies of the PMT • DOE Environment • Help the contractor understand how OSHA is enforced • A CM/GC must closely monitor subcontractor means and methods • Project Safety Standards • Clearly define standards that will apply • Contract clause re most recent standard rev • Initial Work Execution Evaluation • Initial work packages are owner reviewed and executed with owner ‘participation’ • Partnering and committees • Partnering process at onset of project • Safety Stewardship • Conflict Resolution Forum

  8. Develop a Post-Project Safety Evaluation addressing the project safety organization and Lessons Learned, for the benefit of future BES projects ESH specific Lessons Learned document completed Project Lessons Learned document in-progress Develop and implement an End-of-Construction Safety Plan addressing safety issues unique to GC and subcontractor demobilization from the site Multi-action plan following A. Clobes/NIF process Plan covers more than ESH/safety Previous Review Recommendations

  9. Conclusion • Integrated Safety and Environmental Management • Following SLAC ISEMS Process • SLAC ES&H Manual • Work Planning and Control • Following LCLS ES&H management practices • LCLS Requirement, Specification and Interface Documents • Reviews, Authorizations, Continuous Improvement • Experience and Lessons Learned • Understanding the National Laboratory Environment • Partnering for Success • Recommendations • Lessons Learned documented • End of CMGC managed construction safety plan

  10. end of presentation

More Related