1 / 41

College Readiness Comparison District Report

College Readiness Comparison District Report. January 22, 2008. Regional Comparison Districts. Birdville ISD Grapevine-Colleyville ISD Carroll ISD Keller ISD Northwest ISD . Educational Resource Group Best-Practice Districts (2005-06). Aldine ISD

mizell
Download Presentation

College Readiness Comparison District Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. College ReadinessComparison District Report January 22, 2008

  2. Regional Comparison Districts • Birdville ISD • Grapevine-Colleyville ISD • Carroll ISD • Keller ISD • Northwest ISD

  3. Educational Resource GroupBest-Practice Districts (2005-06) Aldine ISD Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Richardson ISD

  4. District ProfileRegional Comparison Districts

  5. District ProfileBest-Practice Districts

  6. TAKSRegional Comparison Districts

  7. TAKSERG Best-Practice Districts

  8. Completion Rate I (w/o GED)Regional Comparison Districts District Completion Rate HEBISD 96.2% BISD 90.4% CISD 100% GCISD 95.8% KISD 93.9% NISD 90.0%

  9. Completion Rate I (w/o GED)ERG Best-Practice Districts District Completion Rate AISD 88.2% CFBISD 94.1% RISD 92.8%

  10. College Readiness Indicators In response to legislative action and executive order from the Governor, the Performance section of the AEIS report has been restructured to group certain indicators under this heading. These indicators help provide a picture of college preparedness at a given high school, and can be used by educators as they work to ensure that students are able to perform college-level course work at institutions of higher education.

  11. College Readiness Indicators The indicators include: • Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion • RHSP/DAP Graduates • AP/IB Results • TSI Higher Education Readiness Component • SAT/ACT Results • College-Ready Graduates

  12. Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Completion Indicator is based on a count of students who complete and receive credit for at least one advanced course in grades 9-12. Advanced courses include dual enrollment courses.

  13. Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment (2005-2006)Regional Comparison Districts District AC/DE HEBISD 27.3% BISD 19.1% CISD 38.6% GCISD 34.9% KISD 28.3% NISD 14.6%

  14. Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment (2005-2006)ERG Best-Practices Districts District AC/DE AISD 11.1% CFBISD 21.5% RISD 30.0%

  15. RHS/DAP Graduates This indicator shows the percent of graduates who were reported as having satisfied the course requirements of the Texas State Board of Education Recommended High School Program or Distinguished Achievement Program.

  16. RHS/DAP Graduates Regional Comparison Districts Data is based on the Graduating Class of 2006 District RHS/DAP HEBISD 73.2% BISD 74.7% CISD 94.6% GCISD 87.3% KISD 91.2% NISD 92.3%

  17. RHS/DAP Graduates ERG Best-Practice Districts Data is based on the Graduating Class of 2006 District RHS/DAP AISD 73.4% CFBISD 72.1% RISD 84.8%

  18. AP/IB Results Refers to results of the College Board’s Advanced Placement examinations and the International Baccalaureate examinations taken by Texas public school students • Tested. Percent of students in grades 11 and 12 taking at least one AP/IB exam. • Examinees >=Criterion. Percent of examinees with at least one AP/IB score above criterion score (3 on AP/4 on IB) • Scores >= Criterion. Percent of scores at or above the criterion score (3 on AP/4 on IB)

  19. AP/IB Results: Tested (2006)Regional Comparison Districts District Tested HEBISD 33.6% BISD 20.5% CISD 43.0% GCISD 46.0% KISD 19.5% NISD 24.0%

  20. AP/IB Results: Tested(2006)ERG Best-Practice Districts District Tested AISD 21.0% CFBISD 29.1% RISD 26.4%

  21. AP/IB Results: Examinees >= Criterion (2006)Regional Comparison Districts Criterion Score: 3 on AP/4 on IB District >=Criterion HEBISD 45.5% BISD 55.5% CISD 73.4% GCISD 74.1% KISD 53.9% NISD 61.7%

  22. AP/IB Results: Examinees >= Criterion (2006)ERG Best-Practice Districts Criterion Score: 3 on AP/4 on IB District >=Criterion AISD 33.5% CFBISD 69.2% RISD 70.1%

  23. AP/IB Results: Scores >= Criterion (2006)Regional Comparison Districts Criterion Score: 3 on AP/4 on IB District >=Criterion HEBISD 37.1% BISD 47.1% CISD 69.5% GCISD 67.1% KISD 45.7% NISD 51.3%

  24. AP/IB Results: Scores >= Criterion (2006)ERG Best-Practice Districts Criterion Score: 3 on AP/4 on IB District >=Criterion AISD 23.0% CFBISD 58.4% RISD 63.9%

  25. Texas Success Initiative –Higher Education Readiness Component • TSI is a program designed to improve student success in college. It requires students to be assessed in reading, writing, and math skills prior to enrolling in college, and to be advised on the results of that assessment. • Students may be exempted from taking a test for TSI if they score a 2200 on their TAKS math and ELA with a written composition score of 3 or higher on the writing component.

  26. TSI-Higher Education ReadinessRegional Comparison Districts

  27. TSI-Higher Education ReadinessERG Best-Practices Districts

  28. SAT/ACT Results Class of 2006 Results include the College Board’s ACT and ACT, Inc.’s ACT Assessment. Only one record is sent per student. If a student takes an ACT or SAT test more than once, the agency receives the record for the most recent examination.

  29. SAT/ACT Results Class of 2006 Three values are calculated for this indicator: • Tested. Shows the percent of graduates who took either college admissions test • At/Above Criterion. Shows percent of examinees who scored at or above the criterion score on either test (1110 on the SAT, or 24 on the ACT) • Mean Score. Shows the average (mean) score for the SAT total and the mean score for the the ACT composite • Writing score not included in SAT calculations

  30. SAT/ACT Results: Tested (2006)Regional Comparison Districts District Tested HEBISD 62.8% BISD 57.8% CISD No Data GISD 93.2% KISD 78.3% NISD 59.4%

  31. SAT/ACT Results: Tested (2006)ERG Best-Practices Districts District Tested AISD 51.9% CFBISD 68.1% RISD 83.9%

  32. SAT/ACT Results: At/Above Criterion (2006)Regional Comparison Districts Criterion Score: 1110 SAT/24 ACT District >=Criterion HEBISD 32.3% BISD 33.3% CISD 56.4% GISD 49.4% KISD 34.4% NISD 34.9%

  33. SAT/ACT Results: At/Above Criterion (2006)ERG Best-Practices Districts Criterion Score: 1110 SAT/24 ACT District >=Criterion AISD 9.3% CFBISD 39.3% RISD 43.3%

  34. SAT/ACT Results: Mean SAT Scores (2006)Regional Comparison Districts District Mean Score HEBISD 1023 BISD 1023 CISD 1094 GISD 1094 KISD 1037 NISD 1030

  35. SAT/ACT Results: Mean SAT Scores (2006)ERG Best-Practice Districts District Mean Score AISD 890 CFBISD 1059 RISD 1066

  36. SAT/ACT Results: Mean ACT Score (2006)Regional Comparison Districts District Mean Score HEBISD 21.1 BISD 21.7 CISD 24.2 GISD 23.5 KISD 21.3 NISD 20.8

  37. SAT/ACT Results: Mean ACT Score (2006)ERG Best-Practice Districts District Mean Score AISD 17.3 CFBISD 21.7 RISD 22.2

  38. College-Ready Graduates This new indicator of college readiness is shown on the AEIS reports for the first time this year. It was created in response to a new statue (TEC 39.051(b)(13) that requires establishing an indicator of “…the measure of progress toward preparation for postsecondary success.”

  39. College-Ready GraduatesIndicator Criteria

  40. College-Ready GraduatesClass of 2006Regional Comparison Districts

  41. College-Ready GraduatesClass of 2006ERG Best-Practice Districts

More Related