1 / 49

Toward Operational Convection-Allowing Ensembles over the United States

Toward Operational Convection-Allowing Ensembles over the United States. Craig Schwartz, Glen Romine, Ryan Sobash, and Kate Fossell The National Center for Atmospheric Research ensemble@ucar.edu. NCAR is sponsored by the National Science Foundation

mlaster
Download Presentation

Toward Operational Convection-Allowing Ensembles over the United States

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Toward Operational Convection-Allowing Ensembles over the United States Craig Schwartz, Glen Romine, Ryan Sobash, and Kate Fossell The National Center for Atmospheric Research ensemble@ucar.edu NCAR is sponsored by the National Science Foundation This work partially supported by NOAA Grant No. NA15OAR4590238

  2. Real-time 3-km ensemble forecasts • Since April 7, 2015, we have been producing real-time, 10-member, 48-hrensemble forecasts • 3-km horizontal grid spacing • Initialized at 0000 UTC daily www.ensemble.ucar.edu

  3. Why are we doing this work? • One of the forefronts of NWP model research is how to design high-resolution ensembles • Also verification and data visualization challenges • Demonstrate feasibility of real-time convection-allowing ensemble forecasting over large areas • The USA currently does not have an operational convection-allowing ensemble

  4. Challenge with high-resolution ensembles • How to design high-resolution ensembles? • Vary just initial conditions? • Configure different members with different physics or dynamics? • We only vary initial and boundary conditions • Single set of physics and dynamics for all members • Equal likelihood among ensemble members • Facilitates investigation of model deficiencies

  5. Components of the NCAR ensemble 1) Ensemble analysis system • Assimilate real observations every 6 hours with an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) • 80 ensemble members • 15-km horizontal grid spacing 2) Ensemble prediction system • 10-member, 3-km ensemble forecasts • 48-hr forecasts initialized at 0000 UTC • WRF-ARW model

  6. Continuously cycling EnKF 6-hr WRF model forecast • Continuous cycling EnKF ens mem 1 background ens mem 1 analysis … … (Members 2-79) Observations ens mem 80 background ens mem 80 analysis 6-hr WRF model forecast

  7. NCAR ensemble analysis domain 15-km 415 x 325

  8. Observations used in the analysis system Radiosonde Aircraft Satellite wind METAR Oklahoma MESONET Marine GPSRO

  9. EnKF-initialized 3-km ensemble forecasts 6-hr WRF model forecast • Dynamically consistent initial conditions Observations Downscale to 3-km and initialize forecast EnKF ens mem 1 background ens mem 1 analysis … … (Members 2-79) Downscale to 3-km and initialize forecast ens mem 80 background ens mem 80 analysis 6-hr WRF model forecast

  10. NCAR ensemble forecast domain • 48-hr, 10-member, 3-km forecasts 15-km 3-km initial conditions from downscaled 15-km analyses 3-km 1581 x 986 415 x 325

  11. How to initialize high-resolution ensembles? • Useensemble data assimilation (NCAR way) • Ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) • Use existing operational ensembles • Cheap and easy but potential for mismatches • Add random noise to a single field • A bit ad hoc • Derive perturbations from external models and add to a single field • Potential for mismatches

  12. “Snowzilla” • East coast blizzard of January 22-24, 2016 • Forecast uncertainty about the northern extent of heavy snow

  13. Forecast initialized 0000 UTC 22 January • Ensemble mean 24-hr accumulated snow between 0000 UTC 23 – 0000 UTC 24 January 24-48-hr forecast inches

  14. Forecast initialized 1200 UTC 22 January • Ensemble mean 24-hr accumulated snow between 0000 UTC 23 – 0000 UTC 24 January 12-36-hr forecast inches

  15. Forecast initialized 0000 UTC 23 January • Ensemble mean 24-hr accumulated snow between 0000 UTC 23 – 0000 UTC 24 January 0-24-hr forecast inches

  16. “Plume diagram” for New York City • Forecast initialized 0000 UTC 22 January

  17. “Plume diagram” for New York City • Forecast initialized 0000 UTC 23 January

  18. Forecast initialized 0000 UTC 22 January • 48-hr accumulated snow between 0000 UTC 22 – 0000 UTC 24 January

  19. Probabilities of 48-hr snowfall > 1 foot within 25 miles of a point Initialized 0000 UTC 22 January Initialized 0000 UTC 23 January Probability

  20. Probabilities of 48-hr snowfall > 2 feetwithin 25 miles of a point Initialized 0000 UTC 22 January Initialized 0000 UTC 23 January Probability

  21. Simulated reflectivity > 40 dBz • Error initializing convection • 6-hr forecast Initialized 0000 UTC 22 January

  22. Severe weather guidance • Smoothed probabilities of the union of hail > 1 inch, wind exceeding 25 m/s, and 2-5-km updraft helicity > 75 m2/s2 within 25 miles of a point over a 24-hr period May 25, 2015 Probability

  23. Severe weather guidance • Smoothed probabilities of the union of hail > 1 inch, wind exceeding 25 m/s, and 2-5-km updraft helicity > 75 m2/s2 within 25 miles of a point over a 24-hr period June 20, 2015 Probability

  24. Severe weather guidance • Smoothed probabilities of the union of hail > 1 inch, wind exceeding 25 m/s, and 2-5-km updraft helicity > 75 m2/s2 within 25 miles of a point over a 24-hr period June 23, 2015 Probability

  25. Severe weather guidance • Smoothed probabilities of the union of hail > 1 inch, wind exceeding 25 m/s, and 2-5-km updraft helicity > 75 m2/s2 within 25 miles of a point over a 24-hr period Feb. 23, 2016 Probability

  26. Severe weather guidance • Smoothed probabilities of the union of hail > 1 inch, wind exceeding 25 m/s, and 2-5-km updraft helicity > 75 m2/s2 within 25 miles of a point over a 24-hr period Feb. 24, 2016 Probability

  27. Severe weather guidance • Smoothed probabilities of the union of hail > 1 inch, wind exceeding 25 m/s, and 2-5-km updraft helicity > 75 m2/s2 within 25 miles of a point over a 24-hr period July 8, 2016 Probability

  28. Severe weather guidance • Smoothed probabilities of the union of hail > 1 inch, wind exceeding 25 m/s, and 2-5-km updraft helicity > 75 m2/s2 within 25 miles of a point over a 24-hr period July 18, 2016 Probability

  29. Severe weather guidance • Smoothed probabilities of the union of hail > 1 inch, wind exceeding 25 m/s, and 2-5-km updraft helicity > 75 m2/s2 within 25 miles of a point over a 24-hr period July 25, 2016 Probability

  30. Severe weather guidance • Smoothed probabilities of the union of hail > 1 inch, wind exceeding 25 m/s, and 2-5-km updraft helicity > 75 m2/s2 within 25 miles of a point over a 24-hr period Aug. 13, 2016 Probability

  31. NCAR ensemble bias • Aggregate biases over 451 forecasts 0.25 mm/hr 0.5 mm/hr 1.0 mm/hr 5.0 mm/hr 10.0 mm/hr 20.0 mm/hr

  32. NCAR ensemble ROC areas • ROC areas for 24-hr forecasts of 1-hr accumulated precipitation aggregated over 451 forecasts

  33. NCAR ensemble calibration • Attributes diagrams for 24-hr forecasts of 1-hr accumulated precipitation aggregated over 451 forecasts

  34. Seasonal forecast skill • 24-hr fractions skill scores (50-km radius of influence) between June 15, 2015 – June 15, 2016 0.25 mm/hr 1.0 mm/hr Date Date

  35. Other research activates • Compare EnKF-initialized ensemble forecasts with other, more traditional, methods of initializing high-resolution ensemble forecasts • Objective verification against National Weather Service watches and warnings • Ensemble sensitivity analysis • e.g., relate Snowzilla displacement errors to the initial conditions

  36. Toward 1-km ensembles • Fractions skill scores over 32 1-12-hr forecasts

  37. Future work • 3-km analysis on current 3-km forecast grid • More frequent analyses (at least hourly) • Assimilate radar, satellite, lightning observations • Requires substantially more computational resources • Post-processing and interpretation • New tools to interpret predictions of hazards • Calibration

  38. Documentation • Paper in Weather and Forecasting describes the system (Schwartz et al. 2015) AMS tweeted about our paper

  39. Summary • NCAR ensemble represents a glimpse of future operational systems • We have demonstrated convection-allowing ensembles are operationally feasible over the U.S. • Contact us if you’d like to collaborate or want real-time data: ensemble@ucar.edu

  40. Surrogates for tornado forecasting Observed tornadoes 2-5-km AGL updraft helicity 0-3-km AGL updraft helicity 1-km AGL relative vorticity Sobash et al. (2016), Wea. Forecasting

  41. Why ensemble forecasts are desirable • Quantification of uncertainty • Naturally produces probabilities! • Allows forecasters to forecast their “true beliefs” • Allows users to make decisions based on expected value and cost-loss scenarios • Forecasts combining information across all members are usually more skillful than single deterministic forecasts

  42. NCAR ensemble forecast domain 15-km 3-km initial conditions from downscaled 15-km analyses 3-km 1581 x 986 415 x 325

  43. NCAR ensemble forecast domain 15-km 3-km initial conditions from true 3-kmanalyses 3-km 1581 x 986 415 x 325

  44. Mean analysis increments August 2015 mean analysis increments at 0000 UTC Lowest model level temperature (K) Lowest model level water vapor (g/kg) Pattern not geographically uniform

  45. Mean analysis increments December 2015 mean analysis increments at 0000 UTC Lowest model level temperature (K) Lowest model level water vapor (g/kg) Different characteristics compared to summer

  46. Why ensembles vs. deterministic forecasts? Ensemble probabilistic forecast skill exceeds performance of deterministic forecasts from the same prediction system

More Related