1 / 15

PIFC development in Moldova

PIFC development in Moldova. Past Future FROM TO Inspection Audit. ‘EU aspirations generate support to introducing PIFC’. The EU and the Republic of Moldova Action Plan : contain provisions for the Public Internal Financial Control (PIFC) implementation

mmungia
Download Presentation

PIFC development in Moldova

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PIFC development in Moldova PastFuture FROMTOInspectionAudit

  2. ‘EU aspirations generate support to introducing PIFC’ • The EU and the Republic of Moldova Action Plan: contain provisions for the Public Internal Financial Control (PIFC) implementation • The Government set up the establishment of PIFC as an objective in various strategies • Establishment of PIFC is supported by the Public Financial Management Project, financed by the World Bank

  3. Implementation Phases I. Initial preparation phase (2006-2007)– setting up a CHU, normative and legal framework, methodology, awareness-building, initial training, keeping existing inspection function II. Centralized audit phase (2008-2009) – Reorganization of Financial Control and Revision Service into Centralized Internal Audit Service for replacement of inspection with internal audit, piloting IA in 3 entities. Methodological and practical support and capacity building III.Decentralized phase– after evaluation of pilots – Decentralized Internal Audit will be established in public sector entities

  4. First steps 2005-2006: • 15 staff of FCRS were trained by external consultants • 6 staff made a one-week study tour on Internal Audit in UK • Concept of IC and IA System in the Public Sector was approved by Government • Awareness seminars • Initial IA Training Initial Phase

  5. Unintended Consequences: • 5 decentralized IA units have been established without general legal and methodological basis • Challenge: make them as IA pilot units and guide them in following the emerging legal, normative and methodological framework Initial Phase

  6. Advantages • Pilot IA units could be created on basis of those 5 units, they need only methodological and capacity building support • No need to convince managers of pilots public sector units in the need for Internal Audit PILOT IA UNITS

  7. Disadvantages • Weak professional skills in IA • Vague understanding of new objectives and functions • Manager’s confusion regarding • ex-post auditor functions with • “ex ante controller ” functions and • traditional financial inspection functions PILOT IA UNITS

  8. The road ahead STRATEGY The Draft PIFC Strategy contains provisions for 3 areas: • Legal • Institutional, and • Capacity building - training and professional development

  9. 1. Legal Actions STRATEGY • Drafting and submitting a Draft PIFC Law • Developing National Internal Audit Standards (NIAS) and National Internal Control Standards • Drafting Code of Ethics • Developing methodology

  10. 2. Institutional area STRATEGY • Strengthening Central Harmonization Unit in the Financial Control and Revision Service • Reorganizing Financial Control and Revision Service into Central Internal Audit Service • Creating PIFC Council • Starting pilot projects in 3 entities

  11. 3. Capacity Building: Training and professional development STRATEGY • Conducting awareness seminars with ministers and senior managers • Designing a program of training and professional development for internal auditors and managers • Conducting certification of auditors in accordance with national and international standards

  12. Enabling factors • The Government’s desire to change the existing system • Action plans posted in government acts • Approval of the Concept of IC and IA system in the Public Sector • Cooperation with the Court of Accounts on reform agenda • Collaboration with the Academy of Public Administration on capacity building • CHU established

  13. Reform challenges • Weak understanding of the advantages of the PIFC System • Weak methodological basis • No PIFC experience • Low level of management skills • To orient the IC and IA to the operational activity of the public entities

  14. Questions 1. What are the major challenges which can anticipated during the implementation of PFIC reforms and how can these be effectively managed? 2. How can the independence of the IA be assured in Moldova? 3. Decentralization: • When is the best moment to decentralize? • How should IA be organized within small entities, especially at the local level?

  15. Questions (cont.) 4. Standards and certification: To what extent is it necessary and/or desirable to develop separate internal audit standards and certification for the public sector and the private sector? 5. Suggestions on Strategy draft(Handout)

More Related