1 / 18

CITEL PCC-III

CITEL PCC-III. Mar Del Plata March 6-10, 2000. Appendix S3 (Agenda Item 1.2). IAP Approved Appendix S3 updated as per CPM Report Recommendation 66 updated Out of band emission limits not to be included in RR. Appendix S7 (Agenda Item 1.3). No IAP

mollyb
Download Presentation

CITEL PCC-III

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CITEL PCC-III Mar Del Plata March 6-10, 2000

  2. Appendix S3 (Agenda Item 1.2) • IAP Approved • Appendix S3 updated as per CPM Report • Recommendation 66 updated • Out of band emission limits not to be included in RR

  3. Appendix S7 (Agenda Item 1.3) • No IAP • U.S. prefer to include ITU-R Rec. (T/G 1/6) through Incorporation by Reference • Canada prefers to transfer most of ITU-R Rec. (T/G 1/6) in Appendix S7 • Other options exist • Canadian views are the same as APT and CEPT

  4. V-Band (Agenda Item 1.4) • IAP developed after many long hours of discussions (Mexico, Costa Rica, Colombia, Bolivia, Peru, Uruguay, U.S., Canada, Argentina) • FSS allocation in Region 1 • Soft partition spectrum: • 37-40 GHz - HDFS • 40-42 GHz - HDFSS/BSS • 42-43.5 GHz - HDFS • Regulatory language of footnotes improved • pfd limits in the 37.5-40 GHz and 42-42.5 GHz bands - Lower than the values in the CPM Report, however, still within range of practical FSS gateway systems

  5. V-Band (Agenda Item 1.4) • satellite power control of +13.5 dB over the pfd limits permitted - percent of time for satellite ATPC subject to new Resolution • Additional primary BSS allocation in the 40-40.5 GHz band • Additional secondary MSS allocation in the 40.5-41 GHz band • terms of reference for Resolution 128 expanded to include BSS in the band 42-42.5 GHz • retained Resolution 726 (MOD)

  6. HAPS in 47/48 GHz (Agenda Item 1.5) • IAP approved (8 CITEL countries) • Canada did not remove name from [ ] • Require more time to review need for “freeze” on FSS applications

  7. IMT-2000 (Agenda Item 1.6) • CITEL common proposal supporting the 1.7 GHz band was approved • In the first session of the IMT-2000 Chapter Group, it was clear that about 10 countries were supporting the 1.7 GHz band • On the second day, Argentina attempted to develop a compromise proposal separating the 1.7 GHz and 2.5 GHz • 1.7 GHz band for initial deployment • 2.5 GHz band subject to further study

  8. IMT-2000 (Agenda Item 1.6) • The 1.7 GHz proposal was approved in the IMT-2000 Chapter Group late Wednesday • formally supported by Argentina, Canada, Peru, Mexico, Chile, Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala • A number of CITEL countries plan to use the 2.5 GHz band for MCS/MDS applications

  9. IMT-2000 (Agenda Item 1.6) • The 2700-2900 MHz band • NOC • IAP supported by a large number of CITEL countries • Canada did not remove name from [ ] • HAPS in IMT-2000 bands • Canada made significant modifications to U.S. proposal • “shall not constrain development of existing systems” • Canada did not remove name from [ ]

  10. Earth Stations on Vessels (ESV’s) (Agenda Item 1.8) • Existing IAP was revised based on the Canadian proposal • Includes technical and operational constraints on ESV’s in the Resolution

  11. MSS in L-Band (Agenda Item 1.10) • IAP approved, using the Resolution in the Canadian Proposal • Revisions to Footnotes S5.353A and S5.352A were not accepted, however, reference to the Resolution requesting studies for prioritization /pre-emption is made in these footnotes

  12. Non-GSO FSS (Agenda Item 1.13) • IAP package was developed based on Canadian and U.S. proposals for the procedures for compliance with operational and additional operational limits • Proposals for revisions to Resolution 130, 538, Article S9, S11, Appendices S4 and S5 were made

  13. Non-GSO FSS (Agenda Item 1.13) • No administration objected to the package, however, some administrations wanted additional time to study before signing • Mexico and Brazil had difficulty in supporting the IAP (CAN/US) regarding the band 17.3-17.8 GHz

  14. Non-GSO FSS (Agenda Item 1.13) • 4 CITEL countries support the complete package • More countries are expected to support the proposal package in the next 2 weeks

  15. RNSS (Agenda Item 1.15) • IAP approved for RNSS allocations in the 960-1215 MHz(1164-1212 MHz), 1260-1300 MHz, 1300-1350 MHz and 5000-5030 MHz • In the band 960-1215 MHz: • Canada proposed 64 MHz • U.S. proposed 24 MHz • ICAO proposed no more than 48 MHz • Agreed to 48 MHz in IAP (U.S. supported only this proposal in the IAP)

  16. Above 71 GHz (Agenda Item 1.16) • Canadian proposal dealing with new Resolutions was accepted • no support for soft partitioning spectrum in the range 71-86 GHz for FS and FSS services • IAP was approved (Argentina, Costa Rica, Guatemala, El Salvador, Mexico, U.S., Uruguay, Canada, Colombia, Chili, Bolivia) • modified allocations in the 71-275 GHz band to satisfy passive services • included new Resolutions XXX and YYY • included Canadian footnote S4.XXX

  17. Appendices S30 and S30A (Agenda Items 1.19, 1.19bis, 1.20) • IAP’s approved based on Canadian and U.S. input • 1.19 - Protection of R2 BSS plan and continuing access to arc 37o W-10o E for R2 FSS use in the band 11.7-12.2 GHz • 1.19bis - RR S23.13/2674 • 1.20 - Articles 6 and 7 of Appendix S30 and S30A among other items

  18. Appendices S30 and S30A (Agenda Items 1.19, 1.19bis, 1.20) • IAP’s on the following: • pfd limits in Annex 1 to Appendix S30 (sections 5b, 5c) • pfd limits in Annex 1 to Appendix S30 (section 8b) • Footnotes S5.487 and S5.490 • Modifications to Article S9, Appendix S5, Articles 4, 6 and 7 of Appendix S30 and S30A to update these Appendices in relation to non-planned services

More Related