380 likes | 537 Views
Restructuring the Census Bureau Regional Offices. COPAFS Quarterly Meeting September 9, 2011. Tom Mesenbourg Deputy Director U.S. Census Bureau. Future Success Demands Innovation. Improving Service to our Clients Survey cost task forces
E N D
Restructuring the Census Bureau Regional Offices COPAFS Quarterly Meeting September 9, 2011 Tom Mesenbourg Deputy Director U.S. Census Bureau
Future Success Demands Innovation Improving Service to our Clients • Survey cost task forces Responding to a changing and demanding environment • Every-ten-year review of regional offices • Increase efficiency, flexibility, and responsiveness Integrating the two objectives
The Need for Change • Budgets will be severely constrained and may well decline over the coming years, while field challenges increase • Our survey sponsors are demanding lower costs, improved efficiency, and increased responsiveness • Over time, the Census Bureau’s share of Federally-sponsored survey work has declined even though reimbursable work accounts for over 20% of our total budget • Survey organizations increasingly use real-time administrative information to create leaner infrastructures • Our regional office structure has remained substantially unchanged for 50 years • Hence, the survival of our survey business requires changes at HQ and in the field
Decision Process for Restructuring the Regional Offices • Over the past year the Director, Deputy Director, Associate Director for Field Operations, Chief of Field Division, and all 12 Regional Directors have worked together to build the restructuring plan • The process was goal and data-driven • Over 20 RO designs were considered, ranging from 4 to 12 regions. • Alternative designs were rated on eight goals, with a focus on minimizing costs and improving data quality • Costs savings, transition issues, and risks were documented for the alternative design finalists
Two Elements of Change • A Change in the Number of Offices • A Change in the Management of Data Collection • The two are linked!
A Change in the Number of Offices6 Regional Offices Option Selected
Delineating Regional Office Boundaries • States within regions were to be contiguous and states were not to be divided • Evaluative criteria― balance the number of interviewers, workload (number of interview hours, projected 2020 population, and total housing units), and difficulty of data collection (projected non-participation rates, and 2010 Hard to Count scores) • Chosen state groupings attempted to minimize inter-region variation on these criteria and attain geographic compactness of the region
Selecting Regional Office Cities • Two prerequisites — existing regional office cities were preferred over new cities and RO city must be in the region it serves • Eight criteria for city selection — large population, close proximity to hard to count populations, geographic centrality within the region, population centrality within the region, high percent college educated population, large transportation hub, low locality pay, low lease costs • Standardized and summed results across criteria for each city — city with the highest score in the new region was selected
6 Regional Office Structure Regional Offices will be located in the following cities: • New York, NY • Philadelphia, PA • Atlanta, GA • Chicago, IL • Denver, CO • Los Angeles, CA
6 Regional Office Structure These offices stay open • New York, NY • Philadelphia, PA • Atlanta, GA • Chicago, IL • Denver, CO • Los Angeles, CA These offices close • Boston, MA • Charlotte, NC • Detroit, MI • Kansas City, KS • Dallas, TX • Seattle, WA
A Quick Look at How Things are Currently Managed • Field Representatives work for Survey Statisticians in the office • Senior Field Representatives work for Program Coordinators in the office, but also serve as “Team Leaders” for Field Representatives • Survey Statisticians in the office are responsible for all aspects of a specific survey • Supervision of FRs (25 to 100, depending on survey) • Analysis of Data • Management of Budget • Administrative Responsibilities
Current Regional Office Organizational Chart and Communication Channels CEQ/CED CPS ACS
Staffing Changes in the 6 Regional Offices • Two Assistant Regional Directors to oversee increased workload (in addition to the Regional Director) • 4 Program Coordinators to manage all surveys, plus all office and field staff • Survey Statistician (Office) with primary responsibility for managing survey workloads versus field staff • Support staff increased in the Regional Office to accommodate the increased workload • Home-based Survey Statisticians (Field) and Field Supervisors manage the field representatives • SFR and LFR positions will be phased out by December 31, 2014. They are encouraged to apply for FS positions or become FRs
Field Representative Responsibilities FR responsibilities and staffing levels will remain the same, including: • Receive assignments via laptop transmissions • Contact sample addresses and establish relationships with respondents • Conduct interviews and any required listing • Keep track of hours, miles, expenses, and other administrative duties
Field Supervisor Responsibilities • Each FS will be assigned a geographic area with responsibility for approximately 10-12 FRs regardless of survey assignments • Provide feedback to the SSF on all survey and staff performance • Manage surveys to meet response, quality and schedule standards • FRs report to a single supervisor (the FS) regardless of the surveys they work on • The FS will conduct FR payroll approvals, performance evaluations, and corrective action
Field Supervisor Training • Management training in preparation to supervise a group of FRs in the field • Administrative training in preparation for personnel, payroll, performance evaluation, and other administrative duties • Focused, program-specific survey training for all surveys
Survey Statistician (Field) Responsibilities • Approximately 8 SSFs per region • Each SSF will be responsible for a specific geographic area • SSFs will work from a “virtual office” in their home and report to an RO Coordinator • SSFs will manage a staff of approximately 12 FSs • Gives us professional expertise in 48 places instead of 12
Survey Statistician (Field) Responsibilities Cont’d. • Responsible for the data collection process for their area • Fully trained on all surveys conducted out of that RO • Works closely with statisticians in the Regional Office to manage the data collection for all surveys, including monitoring quality indicators, response rates, and costs • Works with the RO to support FR recruitment and training
Survey Statistician (Office) Responsibilities • Located in the Regional Office • Program Manager for a specific survey • A “CE SSO”, for example • The “expert” that’s responsible for the data that’s being collected on the survey • Primary Point of Contact between Region and HQ for that survey
Survey Statistician (Office) • Analyzes data results and survey paradata • Assists the SSFs in identifying patterns, trends or inconsistencies that might need attention • Manages the budget and resources • Trains FRs throughout the region • Works closely with HQ and sponsors to ensure that the most accurate data are collected within the survey budget
Program Coordinator Responsibilities • Four per Regional Office • Reports to an Assistant Regional Director • Manages field operations (SSFs), survey operations (SSOs), or support functions (Administration, Geography, Partnership, Recruiting, Automation) on a rotating basis to gain experience and depth • Ensures and enforces information sharing between data collection and program management and analysis
Transition Timeline and Key Milestones This process is happening now • Posting for new positions began in July 2011 • Training related to new duties and responsibilities begins in October 2011 • SSF/FS/FR teams will transition to new supervisory structure in 7 waves between January and November 2012 • The entire transition will be complete no later than January 2013
Implementation Teams are Multi-Divisional and Include Regional Staff • Administration • Automation • Budget • Communications • Consistency • Data Dissemination • Data Quality • Geography • Human Resources • Knowledge Transfer • Risk Review Board • Space and Logistics • Survey Implementation
Transition to New Field Structurein 7 Waves Waves 1 – 6 One SSF, 12 FSs, and 132 FRs in each of the 6 new regions (one data collection team per region) transition to new structure by wave between January and October 2012 (870 field staff nation-wide per wave) Wave 7 Two SSFs, 24 FSs, and 264 FRs per region (two data collection teams per region) transition to new structure in November 2012 Field staff transition to new management structure in 7 waves Cumulative Number of Field Staff (SSFs, FSs, FRs)
Specific Geographies by Wave Implementation Schedule Wave 1 January 2012 Wave 2 April 2012 Wave 3 June 2012 Wave 4 August 2012 Wave 5 September 2012 Wave 6 October 2012 Wave 7 November 2012
Wave Data Analysis • Demographic characteristics were analyzed to determine if any anomalies existed between wave. Variables included: • Weighted tract average Hard to Count score • Total population in each wave • Total housing units in each wave • Weighted average % not completing high school • Weighted average unemployment rate • Weighted average rate below poverty level • Weighted average rate of renters • Weighted average percent Hispanic • Weighted average percent white • Weighted average rate of 65+ • Variances and confidence limits for the mean per wave were calculated. These limits are consistent across all waves. • Overall there are no obvious problems with the designated wave sequence.
Communications with Sponsors • Director has briefed all sponsor agency directors • Director and Deputy will meet quarterly with counterparts and key project managers from Census and the sponsor • Closely Monitoring Cost & Quality during the transition! • Key performance and cost metrics will be used to ensure transition is meeting customers requirements
Monitoring the Transition • Client identifies set of key survey variables • Client identifies key predictors of these variables • Census staff estimates predictive models on those variables, together with a dummy variable indicating new vs. old supervision design • Together we examine these to guide next steps
Office Staff in Closing ROs • Six offices will close January 1, 2013, through a Reduction in Force (RIF) process • Office staff in closing ROs can apply and will be considered for vacancies in the remaining ROs and elsewhere in the Census Bureau • Staff apply for local positions as FRs, FSs, or SSFs • Some will be eligible for retirement or “early” retirement opportunities
Assistance to Staff in Closing ROs Employees in closing offices will be provided with a tailored set of options and assistance that includes: • Preference hiring with other Federal Agencies within the competitive area • Individualized information about retirement, early retirement, or separation incentives, severance pay and/or unemployment benefits • Resumé preparation and job-search assistance
Assistance for Staff in Closing ROs(continued) Additional benefits in Closing ROs: • Career Counseling • Interviewing Skills training • Job Placement services • Financial Planning • Other Services