1 / 18

B OARD of G OVERNORS

B OARD of G OVERNORS. State University System of Florida. Presentation to the Institute for Academic Leadership Dr. Jan Ignash, Vice Chancellor Academic and Student Affairs September 15, 2013 www.flbog.edu . Current Major Board and System Initiatives .

morgan
Download Presentation

B OARD of G OVERNORS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BOARD ofGOVERNORS State University System of Florida Presentation to the Institute for Academic Leadership Dr. Jan Ignash, Vice Chancellor Academic and Student AffairsSeptember 15, 2013www.flbog.edu

  2. Current Major Board and System Initiatives • Major Strategic Planning Tools: The “Three Great Books” • 2012-2025 System-wide Strategic Plan • University Work Plans • Annual Accountability Report • Performance-Based Funding ($20M funding for 3 metrics) • Consider alternative 10-metric BOG model • Access and Educational Attainment Commission($15M funding) • Identification of workforce gaps • System-wide Virtual College Initiatives • UF Online/E-Campus • Florida Virtual Campus (FLVC---both FCS and SUS) • Implementation of the General Education Core (H.B. 1735) • CAVP Academic Coordination Project (Reg. 8.004)

  3. Alignment involves all three of the Board’s “Three Great Books” ANNUAL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT:Tracks performance on key metrics (past five years) SYSTEM-WIDESTRATEGIC PLAN:Provides a long-range roadmap for the System UNIVERSITYWORK PLAN:Provides a short-term plan of action (next three years)

  4. Strategic Plan Progress Review

  5. Improving Graduation Rates FTIC Graduation Rate Trends for the SUS (includes full- & part-time students)

  6. National Comparison of Graduation & Retention Rates Among Ten Largest States for 4yr Public Universities Two-Year FTIC Retention Rates (2010-2011) Six-Year FTIC Graduation Rates (2005-2011) SOURCE: IPEDS. NOTE: Data is based on rates for each university and does not include students who transferred to another institution within the same state/system. This is why these rates for Florida are lower than the State University System data shown previously. Largest states are based on the size of the most recent entering FTIC cohort.

  7. Performance Funding Model (September 11, 2013) • General Appropriations Act & SB 1076 • 3 Metrics & $20 M • Percentage of graduates employed or enrolled in further education • The average wages of employed graduates • The average cost per graduate • Methodology to Legislature by 10/31; allocation by 12/31 • Remaining Issues • Predictable fund source (new funds and/or % of base) • Should a portion be set aside as recurring? • Weights (Should some metrics be a higher priority?) • Board discretion

  8. Performance Funding Model (September 11, 2013) • Four Underlying Principles: • Focus on simple, clear metrics • Align the metrics with the State’s highest goals for higher education • Reward excellence and improvement • Acknowledge unique institutional mission • Board Choice and Board of Trustees Choice • Board picks from a list of metrics • Staff have recommended 3 different metrics for consideration • Trustees will pick from a list of metrics

  9. Performance Funding Model (September 11, 2013) EXAMPLE

  10. Commission on Higher Education Access & Educational Attainment

  11. Commission’s Guiding Questions Will the pipeline of college-age students produce enough college-ready students? 2. Should these new students attend our state universities, or is there a major role to be played by the State’s colleges? 3. Will there be any future need for additional universities or colleges to meet this demand? 4. Will the increased demand be evenly distributed around the state--or will some geographic areas be disproportionately affected?

  12. Key Gap Analysis Questions • Shorter-term • What industries and occupations are projected to be in greatest demand in Florida through 2020—both statewide and by region? • What is the gap between projected demand and potential supply for areas of under-supply, such as I.T.—both statewide and by region? • If we accept BOG degree projections to 2020, what is the potential demand for graduates in top occupations? • Longer-term • Does the Commission envision a more ambitious future for Florida – with demand for higher levels of education for future workers?

  13. Key Findings • There is sufficient capacity in the current system to expand as needed, without building new colleges or universities. • The SUS should work collaboratively with the Florida College System to expand upon demand in strategic ways. • Top three critical workforce needs as identified by the gap analysis: • Computer and Information Technology • Accounting, Financial Services and Auditing • Middle School Teacher Retention

  14. Milestones for an RFP Process 11/21/13: Final report, including RFP, approved by Board of Governors 2/3/14: RFP applications due 3/19/14: Approval of grant awards by Board of Governors 5/15/14: Grant funds distributed to institutions 1/15/15: The first in a series of ongoing progress reports due to Evaluation Team 7/1/15: First year evaluation report due. Second year funding considered.

  15. Online University & Online Task Force • UF Online University • Per 2012 legislation, an arm of the University of Florida was created that will 1) provide high quality online degree programs and 2) establish an innovation and research center to strengthen online programs and promote student success. • Online Task Force • A systemwide Work Group that reports back to the Board of Governors to determine ways in which online degree programs and services, including market-based job analyses, can be better coordinated among all sectors of higher education to ensure State and student needs are being met in a cost-efficient and effective manner.

  16. General Education Core Project (H.B. 7135) • Per 2012 legislation (H.B. 7135), faculty committees identified up to 5 postsecondary courses in each of the general education subject areas of communication, mathematics, social sciences, humanities, and natural sciences to make up a gen. ed. core. Students must complete at least one core course in each area. • Recommendations developed during AY 2012-13 year. • Institutional review and feedback due November 1. • New gen. ed. core effective with the 2014-15 student cohort. • Further Information available at http://www.fldoe.org/articulation/hb7135gep.asp

  17. CAVP Academic Coordination Project • Board Regulations 8.004, 8.011, 8.012 describe system-wide review and approval of new bachelor’s and master’s degrees • Also establishes a process for review of existing programs for low productivity • Board of Governors approves doctoral programs • CAVP-established group meets quarterly in Orlando for peer-review • BOG program database and data provide resources for review • New Educational Sites database under construction

  18. BOARD ofGOVERNORS State University System of Florida www.flbog.edu

More Related