1 / 19

How Electricity Might Compete with Alternate Fuels for Certain End Uses

How Electricity Might Compete with Alternate Fuels for Certain End Uses. Presented to: 2006 Business and Financial Workshop American Public Power Association Minneapolis, MN Presented by: Tim Miller, Senior Rate Analyst Missouri River Energy Services (MRES) Sioux Falls, SD

munin
Download Presentation

How Electricity Might Compete with Alternate Fuels for Certain End Uses

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. How Electricity Might Compete with Alternate Fuels for Certain End Uses Presented to: 2006 Business and Financial Workshop American Public Power Association Minneapolis, MN Presented by: Tim Miller, Senior Rate Analyst Missouri River Energy Services (MRES) Sioux Falls, SD September 19, 2006 Contact Information: Phone: 605-330-6960 Email: tmiller@mrenergy.com

  2. Background Information • MRES information: • Joint action agency with long-term contracts • Serves 60 municipal utilities in Iowa, Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota • Rate studies completed - 47 members plus others • Members receive 50% of power from MRES, 50% from Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) • Wholesale power rates – traditional demand and energy rates; actual demand billed each month • Presentation will focus on heating applications, but could be applied to other uses

  3. Customer Viewpoints - Heating • Natural gas and other fuel costs up 75% or more; volatile • Forecasts indicate prices may not return to historical levels • Many rural coops offer rebates and low off-peak rates • Customers asking municipals what rates are available for electric heating and water heating • One utility – number of dual fuel customers jumped by 20% in just a few years after stable for many years • Should we as a municipal utility attempt to serve customers where possible, as long as we don’t subsidize?

  4. Current Residential Heating Saturations • 52% Natural Gas • 31% Electricity • 9% Heating Oil • 6% Propane • 2% Other • 70% of new homes choosing gas or propane Source: American Gas Association, 2003 Residential Natural Gas Market Survey

  5. Factors Impacting Utility Rates • Rising power costs and distribution materials costs; greater risk of serving new loads • Qualified distribution employees harder to find; salary and insurance cost pressures • Low sales growth rates due to: • Flat or declining population in some cases • Service territory laws and disputes with coops • Low growth rates lead to less contribution margins as fixed costs rise • In some cases, pressure from local government to provide additional funds through transfers

  6. Considerations for a Competitive Rate • Comparison of electric to other fuels • Possible places to compete or not to compete • Cost considerations: • On or off peak power costs • Average or marginal costs • Impact of transfers on rates • Rate concepts: • Off-peak rate design • Recovery of direct costs in rates • Water heater credits • Rebates and incentives • Customer payback

  7. Comparison of Electric to Other Fuels – Residential Heating • 90% Efficient Forced Air – recent price levels • $1.10 / therm gas = 4.2 cents / kWh electric • $2.25 / gallon heating oil = 6.2 cents • $1.50 / gallon propane = 6.2 cents • 200% Efficient Heat Pump – recent price levels • $1.10 / therm gas = 8.4 cents • $2.25 / gallon heating oil = 12.4 cents • $1.50 / gallon propane = 12.4 cents

  8. Places to Compete • In general, should be controlled or off-peak usage • For heating, areas with more heating degree days • Residential: • Forced air, dual fuel plenum heat • Off-peak storage heat – typically on 11 PM-7 AM • Heat pumps • Storage water heaters • Commercial and Industrial: • Storage or slab heat • Dual Fuel – plenum or boilers • Some heat pumps

  9. Places Not to Actively Compete • In general, uncontrolled heating where the bulk of usage occurs during daytime, on-peak hours • (If rates don’t match marginal costs) • Many commercial and industrial uses would fit into this category • In many cases, predominately on-peak demands • C & I might also have access to lower natural gas prices and/or interruptible rates

  10. On or Off Peak Power Costs • Must look at utility resource mix and characteristics: • Purchased power – short or long term contract • Owned generation • Market purchases • Utility load shape • Identify marginal fuel and other variable costs for off-peak hours • Many potentially lower cost hours – Mon-Fri. 10 PM-6 AM plus weekends equals 52% of hours • Should regional market prices dictate your retail pricing?

  11. Average or Marginal Costs • Covered at many previous APPA sessions • Which costs change as a result of this decision or action? • Should each kWh sold carry an equal “allocation” of fixed costs? • Most generation, distribution, administrative, and customer service costs are irrelevant when pricing off-peak services that directly compete with other fuels • Transfers to other city funds may be relevant

  12. Impact of Transfers on Rates • MRES Study of 62 area utilities • Median transfer is 9% • Range is 0% to 52% • How transfer is assessed is key • If it varies by units sold or percentage of revenue, must consider in off-peak rate design • If flat amount or free services provided to city, not a factor • Gas customers may pay franchise fee of perhaps 5% • High transfers may make electric utility less competitive • $0.034 marginal cost + 20% transfer = $0.041

  13. Off-Peak Rate Design • Upper Midwest – Typical Off-Peak Rates • Currently range from 3.2 to 3.7 cents for many utilities • Rate depends on whether cycled or off for several consecutive hours • Separate meter or combined meter • If no time of use rates, better to separate the off-peak usage instead of combining all power in one meter • Apply the power cost adjustment to off-peak rate? • Calculation based on total power costs or just fuel • Make sure capacity costs aren’t rising faster than energy • Customers want stability – advantage over other fuels • But don’t guarantee the rate for a long time period!

  14. Off-Peak Rate Design (Continued) • Should only the controlled customers receive the benefit of not contributing to the peak? Or are we just giving them the rate that matches the costs? • Is a lower profit margin acceptable on off-peak sales? Is getting “something” better than “nothing”? • Mandatory Time of Use Rates • Would be good fit for these concepts • Automatic incentive to use power off-peak • Might be tougher to market – customer has to interpret rate schedule instead of flat discounted rate

  15. Recovery of Direct Costs in Rates • Direct costs of providing off-peak service • Marginal power costs (energy rate) • Additional meter • Load management receiver • Load management system – portion of costs • Maybe some customer service costs • Many utilities prefer flat energy rate with no additional customer charge • Example – direct costs billed as $0.003 vs. $2 / month • Disadvantage to higher volume users

  16. Water Heater Credits • Used for controlled water heaters not on separate meter • Typical credits are $2 - $4 per month, depending on cycle times and avoided costs • Advantage of credit: Easy for customer to understand and see savings on bill • Might specify a minimum usage per month to qualify for credit

  17. Rebates and Incentives • Pay the customer to buy power from you? • Rebates are several hundred dollars in many cases • Chips away at sales margin; calculate utility payback of rebate divided by additional annual margins • In some states, utilities must spend money on efficiency - rebates targeted to efficient appliances • High efficiency water heaters • Heat pumps • Low or no interest loans are another option • Make sure incentive isn’t a complete give-away – creates excess demand even if current appliance is working

  18. Customer Payback • Compare upfront costs of adding off-peak capability against annual savings to determine payback years • Can help set ceiling for proposed rate • Could shorten payback period if tied together with controlled water heating and/or air conditioning • Converting to dual fuel / electric plenum • Payback shorter for fuel oil than natural gas • Some residential customers still switching despite relatively long paybacks (7 to 10 years) • Some gas companies charge for gas service line if not primary heating source

  19. Conclusion • Electricity can be competitive with alternate fuels for certain end uses • Make sure off-peak rates aren’t subsidized by other customers • Provide what the customer is asking for if you can!

More Related