lecture 3: Immigrants , Refugees, I ndigenous Peoples and Linguistic Minorities in Canada

1. lecture 3: Immigrants, Refugees, Indigenous Peoples and Linguistic Minorities in Canada Douglas Fleming PhD Associate Professor Faculty of Education University of Ottawa

2. According to the 2011 Canadian census: The most reported ethnic origin was Canadian (10,563,800), followed by English (6,509,500), French (5,065,700), Scottish (4,715,000), Irish (4,544,900) and German (3,203,300). Over 1 million people reported being of Italian, Chinese, Ukrainian, East Indian, Dutch and Polish descent.

3. First Nations ancestry was reported by 1,369,100. Métis by 447,700; Inuit by 72,600. We have very limited estimates of the pre-contact Native population. At least 90 million natives lived in the Americas; Decline during contact caused by disease, war, economic destruction and deliberate government policy (Daschuk, 2013); The decline was dramatic: • The Haida, for example, declined from 6,000 in 1835 to 588 in 1915. • B.C. one third of the population died in 1862-1863 alone.

4. Census data: • More than 200 languages were reported; • 58.0% spoke only English at home; • 18.2% spoke only French at home; • 20% spoke another language at home; • 213,000 people spoke an Aboriginal language; • 6.5% reported not knowing an official language; • 17.5% reported being able to speak both English and French; • “mother tongues” showing significant recent increases: Mandarin, Arabic, Hindi, Creole, Bengali, Persian and Spanish.

5. Migrants: At least 150 million people are on the move around the globe at any one time (Human Rights Watch, 2007). Of these, 19.5 million are refugees (Citizenship and Immigration Canada, 2015).  Increasingly, developed countries are competing with one another to attract skilled immigrants from these vast diasporas (CIC, 2002). Each year, Canada welcomes roughly 260,000 immigrants, 200,000 temporary foreign workers and 10,000 refugees (CIC, 2013; 2015). These categories are not always clear-cut.

6. 20.6% of Canada’s population was foreign born; Asia (including the Middle East) was Canada's largest source of immigrants ; Immigration from Africa, the Caribbean, Central and South America increasing. Immigration from the United States and Europe is decreasing; The vast majority of the foreign-born population live in urban areas in Ontario, British Columbia, Quebec and Alberta.

7. New France Population • 1720: 24,500 • 1763: 70,000 • 1776: 40,000 to 50,000 Loyalists from the U.S. • 1800-1850: significant British immigration • 1900-1914 immigration: • 1,000,000 British • 750,000 USA • 500,000 Continental Europe • Large waves of eastern European immigration • Procedures excluded black immigration and restricted it to Nova Scotia • Quotas on Japanese and Indian emigration to several hundred per year

8. Immigration Acts of 1906 and 1910. • Defined immigrants; restricted immigration for certain ethnic and political groups; gave government power to deport; assessed landing fees. • Chinese head tax: • Early 1880s: 15,000 workers for CPR • Paid one half to one third of white wages • 1871: 3,000 Chinese nationals in BC • one tenth of non-aboriginal population • 1878 provincial law struck down • 1885: Chinese Immigration Act, $50 head tax • 1903: $500 ($375 yearly average Cdn white industrial wage; created"bachelor society" • 1923: Chinese (Exclusion) Immigration Act

9. 1828: British Emigration Acts • 1907: Vancouver Riot • 1914: Komagata Maru Incident • 1920: Immigration Act • 1946: Canadian Citizenship Act • 1952: mechanisms put in place for deportation or refusal of entry • 1962: removal of race or ethnically-based criteria for immigration; economic criteria introduced • 1967: Points System introduced; major demographic shift towards immigrants from Asia and away from Europe and the U.S. • 1968- mid-1970’s: American draft dodgers: 30,000 and 40,000. • 1973: Refugees from Chile: 7,000 • 1980: Southeast Asian “Boat People”: 60,000

10. 1976-7: provincial/federal arrangements; caps introduced; cost-recovery; removal of restrictions on dual citizenship; no revocation of citizenship except in the case of fraud; appeal boards set up; visitors allowed to apply; designation of four classes of immigrants: family (sponsorship); other (compassionate); refugees; independent (skilled) • 1986-2012: Investor class • 1999: temporary laborer program (incl. international students; agricultural, caregiver and domestic): over 300,000 at any one time • 2014-15: restructuring and restrictions on refugee and family categories; employer-based skilled worker criteria strengthened; greater abilities to deny or revoke (esp. after 9/11) • currently: • Over 250,000 immigrants annually • China, India and Philippines greatest source nations (10-15% each); all others less than 5% • Classes: • Economic (20%): skilled workers; business-based • Family and sponsored (70%) • Refugees (10%)

11. Since 1971, multiculturalism has been an important aspect of Canadian state policy; • Multiculturalism within a bilingual framework; • As Trudeau argued in 1971, bilingualism is essential for Canadian unity and immigration is essential for the nation’s economic growth; • Multiculturalism is in response to the discontent expressed by immigrant groups to the designation of French and English as official languages (Esses & Gardner, 1996).

12. 1971: Federal policy; • 1982: Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms; • Slightly ambiguous: Section 27. “This Charter shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with the preservation and enhancement of the multicultural heritage of Canadians.” • 1985: Canadian Multiculturalism Act; • No subsequent national government has seriously challenged the notion.

13. Young (1984): the policy assumes that inequality is based on individualistic prejudices; however, understanding exploitation or oppression is impossible without making sense of them in terms of the nation as a whole; “national social identity in Canada has been fabricated into a certain nationality through maintaining the dominance of a certain patriarchal Englishness against and under which all others are subordinated” (Young, 1984, p.10). 

14. Corson (1990) noted that multicultural education is laudable only if it is augmented with anti-racist pedagogy; Without this addition, multiculturalism "may provide only a veneer of change that perpetuates discriminatory educational structures. It does little to examine the causes of minority students’ academic difficulties nor to mitigate variations in achievement that different groups have" (p. 150).

15. Critical multiculturalism is a term that was first coined by the Chicago Cultural Studies Group (1992) as a way of critiquing the way in which multiculturalism: • has been dominated by Anglo-American discourses, • shorn of its critical content by corporate interests, and • filled with western-orientated identity politics.

16. Critical multicultural education is an alternative to traditional approaches in that it has social transformation as its explicit goal (May, 1999); It not just for people who have been historically marginalized, but for all students (Kubota, 2004); related to the notion of voice, which is the “repressed histories, memories and experiences of diasporic and marginalized people.” (Luke, 2009, 292)

17. “Teachers! This is the kind of work required of you: You must get acquainted with these people of divers nationalities and interpret to them what our Canadian citizenship means. The solution of the racial problem lies almost wholly in your hands; the future of our glorious country largely depends upon your attitude on this national issue.” (Anderson, 1918, 135).

18. “Defining Canadian culture and preparing L2 teachers to integrate it in a comprehensive and relevant way in our multicultural classrooms is certainly one of the greatest challenges our profession has faced in the last few decades.” (Courchéne, 1996, 14)

19. Courchéne draws upon Damien (1986) to emphasize that culture is: • learned, • changeable, • a universal fact of human life, • a network of relationships and values, • transmitted through language, and • a filtering device.

20. a new cultural vision should: • reflect Canada’s past; • be built around a series of commonly held rights and freedoms; • be reflected in common traditions and symbols; and • explain why inequalities exist and what should be done about them; “internalize it, transform it and return it to us in a new form that incorporates the content of their first culture” (Courchéne, 1996, 25).

21. What might a new cultural vision of Canada look like concretely? How should we view Canadian history in terms of bi/multilingualism? Do different linguistic minorities complete with one another? Should Canada be multi-linguistic as well as multicultural? What is the role of SLE teachers?