1 / 16

A Critical Approach to Understanding URM Graduate Students’ Schooling Experiences in STEM

A Critical Approach to Understanding URM Graduate Students’ Schooling Experiences in STEM. Tanya Figueroa and Sylvia Hurtado UCLA Association for the Study of Higher Education November 2013 St. Louis, MO. Problem.

myrrh
Download Presentation

A Critical Approach to Understanding URM Graduate Students’ Schooling Experiences in STEM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Critical Approach to Understanding URM Graduate Students’ Schooling Experiences in STEM Tanya Figueroa and Sylvia Hurtado UCLA Association for the Study of Higher Education November 2013 St. Louis, MO

  2. Problem • U.S. born Black, Latina/o, and American Indian students continue to be severely underrepresented within STEM graduate programs. • The issue is exacerbated by low 10-year doctoral completions rates. • As low as 40% in some STEM disciplines.

  3. Research Questions • What challenges do URM students face in the formal academic environment that make progression through their STEM graduate program difficult? • Further, how do students respond to these challenges?

  4. Theoretical Perspectives Race is • Embedded within American institutions • Power differentials exist across racial lines Dominant groups • Have the power to “other” those they perceive to be different from them Micro-inequalities • Seemingly trivial practices and behaviors that communicate devaluation or disrespect, which collectively have large consequences on the outcomes of people.

  5. Methodology – • Data come from a larger STEM retention project conducted by HERI, one campus selected • Participants recruited by email from structured STEM programs for URM students • Biographic questionnaire • A semi-structured focus group interview technique

  6. Data Source • Midwestern University (MU) – 42,000 students/15,500 Grad

  7. Analysis • Pertinent data were group coded into salient themes • Constant comparative analysis • Intercoder reliability, iterative process, until agreement was over 85%

  8. Limitations • Student hesitancy to share experiences • Secondary dataset based on a larger project on graduate experiences • Generalizing to other students

  9. Results: Three Overarching Challenges Students Encountered • Negative consequences stemming from “underrepresentation” in one’s program • Exclusion and conflict, and the ambiguous nature of these experiences • Less ambiguous experiences of discrimination

  10. The Phenomena of Underrepresentation • Participants felt “otherized” and hyper visible within academic spaces. • Participants perceived that others: • Were surprised and threatened by their presence • Questioned their ability and commitment to do science • Questioned the merits by which they were admitted

  11. Austin, mechanical engineering, Black Here in [Midwestern University]… there’s not a lot of African American or Hispanics walking around. So whenever a minority enters the engineering department I feel as if there’s already some kind of, I don’t want to say stigma, but there’s always... he or she has to prove himself kind of deal. You know, “I wonder how he or she got here?” kind of thing. Are they filling some quota or whatever the case may be? It’s very subtle. I don’t think the university flaunts it. But I definitely know it’s there.

  12. Exclusion • Negative feelings from being “the only one” were exacerbated by exclusion from peers • Made learning, completing class work, and passing qualifying exams more difficult.

  13. Dominique, electrical engineering, black If I went to a random person and asked the person this question, I’d have understood, but I’m like, this is someone who’s in my lab group… we’re trying to solve the same project together. We’re supposed to have some kind of bond. And then he said that [he wouldn’t discuss the homework with me] and I was like, “Hmm, maybe I have to rethink working with this guy.” If he’s as individualistic as he is then [he’s] probably not the kind of person I want on my team.

  14. Less Ambiguous Experiences of Discrimination I was trying to talk to [a professor] about his research and his response was, “Well, I didn’t think your kind would be interested in this kind of research.” And I stopped and asked myself do I really want to go into this or not?So, of course, me being the way I am, I just decided I’d challenge him. “What do you mean my kind?” And I think a lot of it comes from ignorance – and I don’t even think he thought about what he said. - Brandon, applied physics, Black

  15. Discussion • Considerations of race are hardly absent from students’ experiences in STEM graduate education • Underrepresentation, inequities, and racism disadvantaged participants • Students responded in multiple ways

  16. Implications for Practice • Intentional recruitment of URM students • Nurturing and collaborative educational environment • Learn innovations from other places • Future research • Longitudinal • Stories of those who drop out • Persistence in STEM graduate programs is within reach!

More Related