1 / 17

Jet Tagging Studies at TeV LC

Jet Tagging Studies at TeV LC. Tomáš Laštovička, University of Oxford Linear Collider Physics/Detector Meeting 14/9/2009 CERN. Overview. LCFI Package Monte Carlo Samples Jet Tag Performance and Comparisons Neural Net Inputs and Optimisation Physics Analyses Summary. LCFI Package.

naasir
Download Presentation

Jet Tagging Studies at TeV LC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Jet Tagging Studies at TeV LC Tomáš Laštovička, University of Oxford Linear Collider Physics/Detector Meeting 14/9/2009 CERN

  2. Overview • LCFI Package • Monte Carlo Samples • Jet Tag Performance and Comparisons • Neural Net Inputs and Optimisation • Physics Analyses • Summary

  3. LCFI Package • Used for jet flavour tagging and secondary vertex reconstruction. • Topological vertex finder ZVRES. • Standard LCIO input/output • Marlin environment (used for both ILD/SiD) • Flavour tagging based on Neural Nets. • Combine several variables (more details later) Probability Tubes Vertex Function

  4. Monte Carlo Samples • Generated with CalcHEP 2.5.j • 500GeV, 1TeV, 2TeV, 3TeV center of mass energy • di-jets (e+e- → qqbar) with ISR, no beamstrahlung • Decayed and fragmented with Pythia 6.4.10 • 50k events for b,c and {u,d,s} • event weights are accounted for • s-channel events frequently intensively “boosted” along z-axis due to high energy ISR • radiativereturn to the Z-peak • ~80% of s-channel b-events: Z-peak 1TeV 2TeV 3TeV

  5. Monte Carlo Samples • Events passed to FastMC using both SiD (sid02) and CLIC (clic01_sid)geometries (a minor problem with clic01_sid in FastMC solved). • LCFI package run locally in Oxford (2x4x3x50k = 1.2M events in about 2 days) 3TeV bB-event vtx+tracker

  6. 500GeV SiD • A comparison to the previous (LoI) SiD result done with full digitisation/simulation and beamstrahlung effects. • Neural Nets need to be retrained (see dashed (default NNs) vs full line) • b-tag slightly better while c-tag is slightly worse, generally reasonable agreement. Fast MC, no beamstrahlung SiD LoI, full sim/dig/rec c (b-bkgr)‏ b c

  7. 3TeV SiD vs CLIC Geometry • Purity vs efficiency is not the best plot to look at, it involves cross sections and various acceptance effects. • Nevertheless, here is a comparison of SiD and CLIC geometry at 3 TeV. • SiD geometry over-performs CLIC geometry due to better resolution (especially where light quarks are involved). • At 3TeV more b-quarks decay after 15mm (1st SiD vtx layer) – minor effect if compared to the resolution. c (b-bkgr)‏ b c

  8. Mistag Efficiency vs b-tag Efficiency • Mistag efficiency vs tag efficiency are less affected by cross sections/acceptance effects. • B-tag example (dashed = default b-tag net, full line = retrained) • This net was trained to separate b jets from both light and c-jets, not against c-jets only 3TeV CLIC 500GeV SiD Effect of NN re-training Significantly better performance The exact understanding of this difference is unclear at this stage.

  9. Decay Vertices of B-mesons • B-mesons are significantly more boosted at 3TeV. • And decay further from the interaction point. • In central region, about 9.5% of B0s decay after 15mm (1st SiD layer) and 5.5% after 30mm @ 3TeV. Vertex detector Central barrel 1TeV 2TeV 3TeV

  10. Neural Net Inputs • LCFI package classifies jets in one of three Neural Nets based on #vtx • 1 vertex (only IP vertex), 8 Inputs • R-Phi and Z significance of 2 leading tracks and their momenta • Joint R-Phi and Z Probability • 2 vertices • Decay Length and its significance • Pt mass correction • Raw momentum • Number of tracks in vertices • Secondary vtx probability • Joint R-Phi and Z Probability • 3+ vertices, NN Inputs just as for the 2 vertices but separate NN.

  11. Neural Net Inputs 500GeV - SiD

  12. Neural Net Inputs 3TeV – CLIC Geometry

  13. Important Neural Net Inputs • Most relevant NN inputs are • joint probabilities in both R-Phi and Z coordinates • Pt mass corrections for cases with secondary vertices. • Also secondary vertex probability, raw vertex momentum etc.

  14. LCFI Package Optimisation • Optimisation is not only a matter of Neural Net retraining. The package has plenty of parameters: • Track selection params • ZVRES params • Flavour Tag params • Vertex Charge params

  15. Physics Analyses I • Higgs branching ratios – Higgs-strahlung • H→ccbar analysis was a part of SiD/ILD LoI • Leading to BR uncertainty of about 8.5%. • High quality c-tagging required and advanced analysis. SiD

  16. Physics Analyses – Higgs Self-Coupling with ZHH • Uncertainty on about 30% level claimed for 500 GeV ILC and 2000 fb-1 • We could not reproduce this result due to: • Final state gluon radiation → • It was OFF in many previous studies • Degrades results by a factor of 2. • Real detector response and full set of backgrounds • Further degradation to 100+ % • If a self-coupling measurement is suppose to support the LC case, more work is definitely required. • At 3TeV advantage of higher luminosity, W channel.

  17. Summary We have analysed FastMC so far: experience from LoI tells us that the full simulation and reconstruction is essential as well as a full inclusion of the beam backgrounds. LCFI package should be optimised for 3TeV CLIC, Neural Nets retrained. At this stage, 3TeV CLIC b- and c- tagging is not yet fully understood. We will need to decide what approach to take for the CDR in 2010.

More Related