240 likes | 363 Views
Hazardous Materials Emergency Preparedness (HMEP) Grant 2014-15 Federal Application. Neverley Shoemake and Vance Bennett April 2, 2014. OVERVIEW. Amount of Federal funding expected to be awarded: Planning - $686,693.40 Sub-grants and other local assistance activities: $ 515,020
E N D
Hazardous Materials Emergency Preparedness (HMEP) Grant2014-15 Federal Application Neverley Shoemake and Vance Bennett April 2, 2014
OVERVIEW • Amount of Federal funding expected to be awarded: • Planning - $686,693.40 • Sub-grants and other local assistance activities: $ 515,020 • Supporting LEPC Activities: $ 90,196 • Supporting State Operations: $ 81,477 • Training - $1,050,727.95 • Training 305 individuals • PHMSA Top Priority: Reduce risks associated with the bulk transport of crude oil by rail.
GOALS & OBJECTIVES In alignment with PHMSA’s mission, California’s SEP, SHMP, and THIRA, Cal OES’s primary goal is to encourage a comprehensive approach to planning and training for emergency response directly relating to hazardous materials in transportation, with a specific focus on crude oil by rail and a secondary emphasis on chlorine by rail. We aim to improve preparedness for responding to these types of emergencies in an effort to minimize the potentially catastrophic impacts to the people and communities of California.
PLANNING OBJECTIVES • Develop, improve, and implement emergency plans or procedures • Targeted outreach to CUPAs with outdated Area Plans • Priority: Area Plan updates for crude oil by rail • Standardize and update LEPC Regional Response Plans
PLANNING OBJECTIVES • Emergency response drills and exercises • Highest priority: crude oil by rail scenarios • Secondary priority: chlorine by rail scenarios • LEPC Regional Response Plan exercises
PLANNING OBJECTIVES • Determine hazardous materials flow patterns • Past sub-grantees • Highest priority: studies focusing on oil by rail • Secondary priority: focusing on chlorine by rail • Statewide assessment of studies that already exist
PLANNING OBJECTIVES • Assess the need for regional HazMat response teams • Priority: crude oil by rail transportation routes • Statewide assessment
PLANNING OBJECTIVES • Training needs assessment • Improve contact with eligible HazMat responder entities • Standardize processes
PLANNING OBJECTIVES • Maintain a compliant grant program • Meet reporting timelines • Conduct internal webinars • Conduct sub-grantee webinars • Monitor sub-grantee quarterly documentation • Grant management training and workshops
PLANNING OBJECTIVES • Maximize HMEP Planning funds • CUPA Conference and Continuing Challenge sponsorships • LEPC Continuing Challenge registration fee waivers • LEPC Travel fund • Increase outreach
PLANNING TIMELINE • March 2014 –Sub-grant application announcement • April 2014 – Submit federal HMEP Grant Application • April 2014 – Conduct sub-grant application webinar • June 2014 – Sub-grant application filing deadline • August 2014 – Expect federal Notice of Grant Award • October 1, 2014 – Federal performance period begins; • October 15, 2014 – Sub-grant performance period begins • December 31, 2014 – Identify unobligated funds • September 15, 2015 –Sub-grant performance period ends • September 30, 2015 – Federal performance period ends
HMEP Grant Application Training Program
Training Goal • Maintain the ability of public safety employees to safely and effectively respond to uncontrolled releases of hazardous materials.
Training Objectives • Provide standardized training • Maintain train-the-trainer program • Maintain mutual aid capability
Standardized Training • Comply with Hazwoper regulation • Title 8 CCR §5192(q) • Follow NFPA 472 recommendations • Carry out mandates of GC §8574.19-21
Train-the-Trainer Program • Train and certify new instructors • Expand pool of instructors • Increase total amount of training provided • Make possible in-house training • Greater flexibility • Lower costs
Mutual Aid • Train members of new typed-teams • Maintain staffing on existing teams • Normal turnover/transfer • Retirements
Proposed Training • Hazmat Technician • Three 4-week series • Regions II, V, VI • 40 students each
Proposed Training • Instructor Certification • One class • Region I • 30 students
Proposed Training • Hazmat Technician/Specialist Refresher • One class • Region I • 30 students
Proposed Training • First Receiver Decon for Healthcare • One class • Region III • 35 students
Proposed Training • Hazmat Incident Commander • Two 2-day classes • Regions III & IV • 30 students each
Proposed Training • Railcar Safety • One class • Region IV • 30 students