1 / 42

Harvesting Information to Sustain our Forests NSF DIGITAL GOVERNMENT PROGRAM

Harvesting Information to Sustain our Forests NSF DIGITAL GOVERNMENT PROGRAM. Lois Delcambre, Professor Computer Science and Engineering OGI School of Science & Engineering Oregon Health & Science University CS Colloquium Series – Oregon State University. Overview of the Talk.

naeva
Download Presentation

Harvesting Information to Sustain our Forests NSF DIGITAL GOVERNMENT PROGRAM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Harvesting Information to Sustain our ForestsNSF DIGITAL GOVERNMENT PROGRAM Lois Delcambre, Professor Computer Science and Engineering OGI School of Science & Engineering Oregon Health & Science University CS Colloquium Series – Oregon State University Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 1

  2. Overview of the Talk • Introduction to the project & application • Metadata++ • Superimposed Schematics Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 2

  3. Partner: USDA Forest Service (Region 6) Dr. Tim Tolle, Co-Project Director Focus: Adaptive Management Areas Agency documents Natural resource manager Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 3

  4. Computer Science Lois Delcambre Dave Maier Mat Weaver Shawn Bowers Bill Howe Sun Murthy Rupa Tummala Management in Science & Tech. Fred Phillips Nicole Steckler Marianne Koch Balbinder Banga Environmental Science & Engineering Patty Toccalino Julia Norman Kirsten Zillman The academic team Len Shapiro, PSU Undergraduate students high-school apprentice(s) Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 4

  5. url1 url2 Xkb Elkuo I Lksuero Mosei Xoi vet t;osu 0359u Call John @ (503)555-1234 Documents • Vary in format (text, map, dataset, …) • Vary in purpose (formal assessment, informal letter, …) • Represented by document proxies Metadata++ documentproxies Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 5

  6. Capabilities of The Forest Portal Document Upload File: Author: Title: Type: Contact: Notes: Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 6

  7. Capabilities of The Forest Portal Metadata Attachment Metadata Property Value Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 7

  8. Capabilities of The Forest Portal Keyword Search Search Keyword: Metadata Search Browse Category Location > Region 6 > Wenatchee National Forest BOR Road IssuesA memo to the U.S. Department of the … [Metadata] [Similar Documents] Appeal Decision: Plum Creek Checkerboard …Final decision, pursuant to 36 CFR 215, appeal on … [Metadata] [Similar Documents] Interstate 90 Final Record of DecisionDocuments my rationale and selection of Alternatives … [Metadata] [Similar Documents] Interstate 90 LegislationConference report on H.R. 438, making Omnibus … [Metadata] [Similar Documents] Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 8

  9. Capabilities of The Forest Portal Similarity Search Metadata Property Value Using Browse Category Location> Region 6> Wenatchee National Forest BOR Road IssuesA memo to the U.S. Department of the … [Metadata] [Similar Documents] Appeal Decision: Plum Creek Checkerboard …Final decision, pursuant to 36 CFR 215, appeal on … [Metadata] [Similar Documents] Interstate 90 Final Record of DecisionDocuments my rationale and selection of Alternatives … [Metadata] [Similar Documents] Interstate 90 LegislationConference report on H.R. 438, making Omnibus … [Metadata] [Similar Documents] Find Similar Documents (through associated Metadata) Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 9

  10. USDA FS & Other Agency Staff Activities • Identify domains of interest • Identify controlled vocabularies, glossaries, … • Evaluate and select one or more controlled vocabularies • Identify cross-reference schemes • Identify relationships of interest Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 10

  11. Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 11

  12. Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 12

  13. Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 13

  14. AFIDkeywords.doc mistletoes root diseases rots and decays foliage diseases cankers rusts seedling diseases bark beetles wood borers defoliators seed and cone insects shoot and twig insects sucking insects silvicultural treatments thinning salvage sanitation pruning Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 14

  15. climate_terms.xls (excerpt) CLIMATE - TERMS ABSOLUTE TEMPERATURE ADVECTION ADIABATIC AIR MASS ALBEDO ANEMOMETER ANNUAL FLOOD ANOMALY ARIDITY ASPECT BAR BAROMETER BIOCLIMATIC BOWEN RATIO BPI PAN BULK DENSITY CLASS A PAN CLIMATOLOGICAL OBSERVATION CONVECTION DAILY MEAN DAY DEGREE DEGREE DAY DEW DEW POINT DROUGHT DRY BULB THERMOMETER EVAPOTRANSPIRATION FETCH Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 15

  16. Overview of the Talk • Introduction to the project & application • Metadata++ • Superimposed Schematics Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 16

  17. vocabulary vocabulary vocabulary broader-term/ narrower-term relationships (shown as hierarchy) terms Metadata++ Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 17

  18. Metadata++: Terms & Relationships same term may appear in more than one vocabulary – with different, even contradictory broader-term/narrower-term relationships Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 18

  19. Metadata++: Terms & Relationships synonym relationships Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 19

  20. Metadata++: Associative Relationships functional relationships such aswildlife-habitat relationships - supports similarity search & browsing! Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 20

  21. Metadata++ • Exploiting broader-term-narrower-term • If you attach a narrow term…attach all broader terms as well • If you search for a term…search for all narrow terms as well • Support multiple hierarchies - with cross-references indicated as synonyms (as available) Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 21

  22. Forester Perspective Climatologist Perspective Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 22

  23. [Atmosphere] – [Air Quality] – [Air pollution] – [smoke] D1 Attachment Relationship using Climatologist Perspective [Vegetation Management] – [Air pollution] – [smoke] D2 Attachment Relationship using Forester Perspective Documents with Attachment Relationships [Atmosphere] – [Air Quality] – [Air pollution] – [smoke] Search specified in climatologist perspective Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 23

  24. Search: blue terms wild card, black terms mandatory Shows the attachment path for the document Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 24

  25. Location Perspective (Heber) Location perspective (Martin) Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 25

  26. Templates for Metadata Entry slot label Slot each slot is associated with one term from one perspective Location Climate Hydrology Soil Planning Authorizing Location Keywords Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 26

  27. Metadata++ • Inspired by Dublin Core, Z39.19 (Thesaurus), … • Simple, uniform model: terms & relationships • No classes • No attributes (for terms or objects) • Basic idea – broader-term/narrower-term relationship is intentionally overloaded to represent • Broader-term/narrower-term • Type – instance • Collection (set) – member • Traditional property name • Model has been formalized; query and browse capability is being defined Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 27

  28. MetaData eXtract • Metadata attachment may take some time • MDX helps by suggesting terms from Metadata ++ • Results are suggested to the user … interactively The district silviculturalist at the McKenzie Ranger District on the Willamette National Forest is working on an EIS for a timber sale located within the upper McKenzie watershed. During the scoping process, the silviculturalist and rest of the IDT identified two areas in particular where the objectives would be to promote and accelerate the development of late successional characteristics over time. Both areas are located within Douglas-fir forest types; one within a Western hemlock/dwarf Oregon grape plant association, or potential vegetation type, and one in a riparian reserve that has a plant association of Western hemlock/Oregon oxalis...... Willamette National Forest McKenzie Ranger District Douglas-fir Western hemlock potential vegetation Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 28

  29. Overview of the Talk • Introduction to the project & application • Metadata++ • Superimposed Schematics Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 29

  30. Schematics: Decision Letter Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 30

  31. Schematics: Review Letter Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 31

  32. name name order name name The Appeal Decision Schematic num date id 1:1 regard 1:* Appeal 1:1 0:* cover Decision Appeal Decision 1:1 0:* loc desc 1:1 1:1 1:* issuer define result concern 1:1 request 0:* 1:1 1:* Determination resolve Issue 0:* 1:* 1:1 Appellant status desc role desc 1:1 review behalf response 0:1 1:1 0:* Reviewing Officer Deciding Officer Organization title title address respondent For respondent For Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 32

  33. Part of a Populated Schematic Appeal Decision (AD1) regard (r1) cover (c1) Decision (D1) Appeal (A1) loc concern (n1) define (d1) issuer date Issue (I1) Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 33

  34. Part of a (different) Populated Schematic Appeal (A1) define (d1) define (d2) define (d3) resolve (r1) resolve (r1) Determination (D1) Determination (D1) resolve (r1) Issue (I2) Determination (D1) Issue (I2) Issue (I2) Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 34

  35. Querying a Superimposed Schematic “For Appeal Decisions made in the last two years, what Appellant Issues were raised for Decisions concerning the Mount Hood National Forest” Issue[AppealDecision(id="1570-1-0032-10").concern(order=1)]The decision violates the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). The illegal advisory committee played a central role in influencing the Forest Service Decision. Issue[AppealDecision(id="1570-1-0032-10").concern(order=2)] The decision significantly reduces hunting opportunity and habitat for deer and elk. Issue[AppealDecision(id="1570-1-0035-13").concern(order=1)] The District Ranger's decision is not in accordance with the legal requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act, the National Forest Management Act, and the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act. Issue[AppealDecision(id="1570-1-0038-19").concern(order=1)] Current stand condition is not adequately addressed, impacts on soil quality are not addressed, and that impacts to various species are not considered, including several late successional species, survey and manage species, and management indicator species. Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 35

  36. Appeal Decision (AD1) concern (n1) result (r1) resolve (v1) Determination (D1) Issue (I1) Enhanced Addressing Issue[AppealDecision(id="1570-1-0032-10").concern(order=1)]The decision violates the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). The illegal advisory committee played a central role in influencing the Forest Service Decision. Issue[AppealDecision(id="1570-1-0032-10").concern(order=2)] The decision significantly reduces hunting opportunity and habitat for deer and elk. Issue[AppealDecision(id="1570-1-0035-13").concern(order=1)] The District Ranger's decision is not in accordance with the legal requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act, the National Forest Management Act, and the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act. Issue[AppealDecision(id="1570-1-0038-19").concern(order=1)] Current stand condition is not adequately addressed, impacts on soil quality are not addressed, and that impacts to various species are not considered, including several late successional species, survey and manage species, and management indicator species. Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 36

  37. USDA FSEmployee name name Superimposed Schematics date id • Entity-relationship-style model is superimposed over arbitrary, base documents • Each entity, each attribute, and each relationship can be “anchored” at some text excerpt • Includes “authoritative” entities – such as for person Appeal Decision 1:1 1:1 review response 0:1 1:1 Reviewing Officer Deciding Officer title title respondent For respondent For Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 37

  38. Superimposed Schematics • Represented using the uni-level description • Generic, uniform representation for structured information • Can accommodate a variety of data models (database models, XML, RDF, topic maps, …) • Can accommodate schema-first, schema-later, schema-optional information • Can accommodate multiple levels of schema-instance relationships in a single model • Based on a metamodel (with basic structures such as set, bag, list, struct, attribute, and scalar) • Logic-based language (Datalog) can easily be used to transform data (model-model, schema-schema, …) Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 38

  39. What is Superimposed Information? data “placed over” existing information sources to • highlight • annotate • elaborate • select • collect • organize • connect • reuse information elements often to support new applications, beyond the original Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 39

  40. Examples of Superimposed Information • Non-electronic examples: • Commentaries on religious texts, law, literature • Concordances, citation indexes • Electronic examples: • Bookmark file in your web browser • RDF metadata Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 40

  41. The superimposed and base layers with marks Superimposed Layer marks Base Layer Information Source1 Information Source2 Information Sourcen … Focus: building generic technology Two examples: Metadata++ and Superimposed Schematics Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 41

  42. Lois Delcambre, OSU CS Colloquium Series 42

More Related