1 / 11

EDTC 6321 Group Project

EDTC 6321 Group Project. April 24, 2006. Welcome. Team Elvia Villafranca Yvette Perez Reynaldo Robles Dawn Quinn. Design Review . . dawn quinn. Site reviewed – http://www.kidzonline.org/LessonPlans/ Design review criteria –

nancy
Download Presentation

EDTC 6321 Group Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EDTC 6321Group Project April 24, 2006

  2. Welcome . . . . • Team • Elvia Villafranca • Yvette Perez • Reynaldo Robles • Dawn Quinn

  3. Design Review . . dawn quinn • Site reviewed – http://www.kidzonline.org/LessonPlans/ Design review criteria – • Point 1 - The lines in the page are constrained so that they never exceed 8 to 15 words per line. • Point 7 - Each page has a meaningful title in the Title Bar.

  4. Design Review con’t . . . • Point 14 - Graphics have an ALT Text tag to make them accessible to the visually impaired. • Point 15 - For data tables, identify row and column headers.

  5. Subject Matter Expert . .rey robles • 3 Subject Matter Experts • Taken and Observe PowerPoint courses • In the field for over four years • Provide tutoring to students • Provide classroom support to instructors

  6. SME con’t . . . . . • Formative Evaluation for SMEs should focus on: • Content—Good Exercises and Materials • Learner Point of View—Hit Target Audience • Accuracy—Very Accurate • Fluidity—Video was great, but need high speed internet • As designers, we not obligated to use their suggestions.

  7. Learner Validation Presented by Elvia Villafranca

  8. Ongoing EvaluationPresented by Yvette Perez • Assessment:Using Instructional Materials students will assess the instructional delivery of the Kidz Online Lesson Plan (PowerPoint) • Two one-to-one learners (one high and one average achiever) will complete and provide feedback utilizing the following: • Hands-on activity • Questionnaire • Online resources included within the lesson • Peer-review:One-to-one formative evaluation using two different learners; one high and one average achiever evaluate the Kidz Online PowerPoint Presentation • Using a questionnaire, students will rate the presentation based on the following: • Hyperlinks • Fonts • Use of graphics • Ease of navigation • Overall presentation • Is the instructor’s goal for the presentation evident? • Is the presentation understandable or are you confused?

  9. Ongoing Evaluation(cont’d) PowerPoint Presentation Instructional Materials Evaluation Form • Outcomes:Review of the one-to-one small group evaluation (Delivery System) • This delivery system is feasible for students who are familiar with PowerPoint and have optimal keyboarding skills. The system is also justifiable for use by novice PowerPoint users/learners because of the instructional materials provided and it’s effectiveness with regard to the learner’s ability to clearly understand the lesson • Modification:Use of a rubric assessment • Ongoing evaluation will allow the instructor to modify (if needed) the lesson based upon reviewers’ responses and or suggestions for improvement. Question Rating Responses Suggestions for improvement Rating System: 1=Not at all; 2= Somewhat; 3=Mostly; 4= Very

  10. The End

  11. Your turn . . . .

More Related