1 / 38

Catalogues & Standards for Knowledge, Information & Data

Catalogues & Standards for Knowledge, Information & Data. Alan Doniger Chief Technology Officer POSC. Outline. There is a requirement for common vocabularies, syntax, and classifications within the E&P industry in support of effective knowledge work.

nardo
Download Presentation

Catalogues & Standards for Knowledge, Information & Data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Catalogues & Standards for Knowledge, Information & Data Alan DonigerChief Technology OfficerPOSC

  2. Outline • There is a requirement for common vocabularies, syntax, and classifications within the E&P industry in support of effective knowledge work. • The current POSC E&P Cataloguing Standards • History • Roles • Future Evolution • Underlying principles • The K-I-D continuum • Spanning traditional documents and digital data • Context and its capture • Cataloguing as a natural part of our business processes • Accessing the Standards from the POSC Web Site

  3. POSC E&P Cataloguing Standards • Shell’s request to POSC, Feb. 2002 • “Promulgate, evolve, and support E&P Cataloguing Standards as global industry standards” • ‘Adopted’ by the POSC Data Store Solutions SIG • The highest priority of five published recommendations • Developed July – December ’02 • Published March ’03 • Ongoing subject for the SIG acting as the (virtual) E&P Cataloguing Standards User Group • POSC Member Conference Presentations • Houston and London, April – May ’02 • (Shell Expro, Erik van Kuijk) • London and Houston, Oct. – Nov. ’02 • London, May ’03 • Shell NAM, Hugo Belder • Danish oil company, Christian Hoeier

  4. POSC E&P Cataloguing Standards • Workshops/Seminars: • Shell Expro Workshop, Aberdeen, Mar. ’02 (DTI/CDA/POSC) • POSC Workshop, Houston, Sep. ’02 • POSC Workshop, Scavenger, Dec. ’02 • PPDM Taxonomy Seminar, Calgary, Sep. ’03 • PNEC Data Management Conference, Houston, May ’04 • DSS Regional SIG Meetings, Scavenger and Houston, June ‘04 • Material submitted to POSC thus far: • Shell Expro, Mar. ’02 • Shell PMI, Business Process Reference Model, Q3 of ‘02 • Flare, Q3-4 of ’02 • Shell NAM, April – Jun. ’03 • Shell Global Taxonomy, anticipated in ‘05

  5. Lord Browne (CEO, BP) has said, "Anyone in the organization who is not directly accountable for making a profit should be involved with creating and distributing knowledge that the company can use to make a profit."

  6. Underlying Principles Treat Knowledge, Information & Data as a continuum Build catalogues that span Information in documents and databases – using standardized classification schemes Understand and capture Information ( K-I-D ) context Manage knowledge capture and classification as natural parts of the business process

  7. Business oriented Requirements and Prioritization • Catalogue attributes • Attribute vocabularies • Views and mappings • Functionality and interaction Portal GIS TEXT Reference Data Catalogue Adapter Adapter Adapter Ref 1 Ref 2 Source n Source 2 Source 1 Catalogue and the DSS SIG Interests

  8. Bibliographic Control Title Author Project/AFE Approved By Description Unique Ref Language Tag/EDCC Security Entitlement Retention Recipient Published Status Review Date Source Organisation Cross References Revision Code Content Owner Published Date Usage Location Representation Coverage Media Logical Format Contextual Datum Geographical Cords/polygon Producer Discipline Customer Discipline Scale Cord System Info Item Type Info Item Class Asset Type Producer Business Process Asset UID System Relationships Info Type Last Modified System UID Compound Document Created By Collection File Size • The contextual attributes • Consistent, intuitive navigation • Cross function/business • - Use E&P language E&P Catalogue Attributes

  9. “Bibliographic” “Control” Title Author Project/AFE Approved By Description Unique Ref Language Tag/EDCC Security Entitlement Retention Recipient Published Status Review Date Source Organisation Cross References Revision Code Content Owner Published Date “Usage” Location Representation “Coverage” Media Logical Format “Contextual” Datum Geographical Cords/polygon Producer Discipline Customer Discipline Scale Cord System Product Group Product Type Asset Type Business Process Asset UID “System” “Relationships” KID Type Last Modified System UID Compound Document Created By Collection File Size E&P Catalogue Attributes “Contextual” Producer Discipline Consumer Discipline Information Item Class Product Type Info Item Type Asset Type Producer Business Process Asset UID Information Type The ‘Information Item Type’ has a unifying role as a Generic Title jump

  10. Contextual Attributes Producer Business Process Consumer Business Process Information Item Type / (Work) Product Type / Standard Title Information Item Class/ (Work) Product Class Information (K-I-D) Type Producer Discipline Consumer Discipline Asset Type Asset Identifier

  11. Contextual Attributes Producer Business Process Consumer Business Process Information Item Type / (Work) Product Type / Standard Title Information Item Class/ (Work) Product Class Information (K-I-D) Type e.g. Appraisal Well Proposal Well Rock/Core Data Well Completion Programme Active Well Drilling Process Producer Discipline Consumer Discipline Asset Type Asset Identifier An Information Item Type automatically maps to the other contextual Attributes (and more). This can simplifying the CATALOGUING process.

  12. Contextual Attributes Producer Business Process Consumer Business Process Examples Standards Raw data/as-built records Lesson Learned Plans, Programmes Proposals, applications Contracts and agreements Operations Report Correspondence Meeting Minutes Audits and Inspections Analysis and Interpretation Information Item Type / (Work) Product Type / Standard Title Information Item Class/ (Work) Product Class Information (K-I-D) Type Producer Discipline Consumer Discipline Asset Type Asset Identifier

  13. Contextual Attributes Producer Business Process Consumer Business Process Examples Well Drilling Well Data Acquisition Determine Hydrocarbon Structure Seismic Interpretation Evaluate rock/fluid properties Petrochemical Interpretation Calculate hydrocarbons in place Information Item Type / (Work) Product Type / Standard Title Information Item Class/ (Work) Product Class Information (K-I-D) Type Producer Discipline Consumer Discipline Asset Type Asset Identifier

  14. Contextual Attributes Producer Business Process Consumer Business Process Information Item Type / (Work) Product Type / Standard Title Information Item Class/ (Work) Product Class Information (K-I-D) Type Producer Discipline Consumer Discipline Examples Geology Geophysics Petrophysics Reservoir Engineering Production Technology Asset Type Asset Identifier

  15. Contextual Attributes Producer Business Process Consumer Business Process Information Item Type / (Work) Product Type / Standard Title Information Item Class/ (Work) Product Class Information (K-I-D) Type Examples Well Basin Field Survey Platform Pipeline Reservoir Producer Discipline Consumer Discipline Asset Type Asset Identifier

  16. Contextual Attributes Producer Business Process Consumer Business Process Information Item Type / (Work) Product Type / Standard Title Information Item Class/ (Work) Product Class Information (K-I-D) Type Examples Well:Rock/Core Well:Equipment:Tubing Well:Header Well:Synthetics Well:Strat Pick Field:Reserves Survey:Site Survey Pipeline:Ullage Producer Discipline Consumer Discipline Asset Type Asset Identifier

  17. Another thought … If the product plans for successful projects in this area (inter-enterprise information exchange) were to be analyzed, the finding would be that considerable time is spent not so much in defining interfaces but in classifying and providing common terms for the business aspects in that domain. Source: Cutter Consortium

  18. Versions Taxonomy Issues Taxonomy Usage Guidelines Reference Models Industry Taxonomy Aliases Company Unique • Different names for the same items • local names • languages • Different items • regulatory regime • differing business processes • legacy

  19. jump

  20. jump

  21. jump

  22. jump

  23. Summary In ’02, The Shell Expro experience with Cataloguing was presented to industry. POSC agreed to support and evolve supporting attribute and vocabulary definitions. Several workshops were held. In ’03, POSC published the first version of the standards on recommendation of the DSS SIG. Shell (Holland) expanded Expro’s work. Shell has been working on global integration. Efforts to enable and align related E&P specifications and standards (e.g. reference value standards) with the E&P Cataloguing taxonomy standards should go forward.

  24. Summary In ’05, we hope to achieve enhanced E&P Catalogue standards based on input from Shell and others. Broad industry participation is essential! Efforts towards practical solutions can be incremental. Benefits can be realized along the way. Focusing on taxonomies and cataloguing is an essential part of the trend by large oil and service/software companies towards data storage and access federation.

  25. Contact Alan Doniger doniger@POSC.org +1 713 267 5124 www.POSC.org

More Related