320 likes | 589 Views
Chapter 15: The Bureaucracy Honors Classes, November 20, 2013. What’s a bureaucrat?. Class exercise: first impressions. Stereotype: “I’ll answer your phone call when they pry my coffee cup from my cold dead hand.” . Why Study the Bureaucracy?. Because it has a BOATLOAD of power!
E N D
Chapter 15: The BureaucracyHonors Classes, November 20, 2013
What’s a bureaucrat? • Class exercise: first impressions. • Stereotype: “I’ll answer your phone call when they pry my coffee cup from my cold dead hand.”
Why Study the Bureaucracy? • Because it has a BOATLOAD of power! • Statutes get implemented through regulations. Bureaucrats write and apply the regs. • Remembering specific names of all the agencies is not the goal here. • Rather, we’re focused on trying to understand the general structure of the bureaucracy along with the causes and implications of bureaucratic behavior.
What is a bureaucracy? A bureaucracy: • Just one model for how an organization can be set up. • Take any large group of people and organize them into (hopefully) productive tasks. • Examples: the military, Wal-Mart, McDonalds, even good ol’ Mc-T. The bureaucracy: • Usually refers to the government, and even more specifically, the Executive Branch of the federal government. • For purposes of this class, that’s what we’ll mean.
There are lots of agencies in the federal gov’t • See http://www.usa.gov/directory/federal/index.shtml
“A” bureaucracy’s characteristics Any bureaucracy is likely to have the following characteristics: • Hierarchy. Maybe like this one:
A bureaucracy (cont.) • Division of labor/specialization. • Each one of those boxes has a job to do. • Makes coordination really hard. • Often waaaay too many people get involved in a project.
A bureaucracy (cont.) Lots of SOPs – standard operating procedures. • These are the way things need to be done. • Agencies will have binders full of things that look like this:
Some pros and cons of gov’t bureaucracies Pros: • In theory, all that specialization and those SOPs can lead to more efficient decision-making. • Career employees can lead to more objective outcomes. • There actually can be (and is) creativity when people work in a group setting. Cons: • Efficient decision-making?! Are you kidding me? • Work expands to fill the time (Parkinson’s “Law”). • Much less accountability. • Not the same incentives as in the private sector. • REALLY hard to fire someone. Can result in “dead wood.”
Big picture unpacked There’s the Executive Office of the President (“EOP”) • The President’s closest advisors. The “West Wing” folks. Why “West Wing”? Because they work in the West Wing of the White House.
Executive Office of the President (EOP) • A bit of trivia for you: Until 1857, the President paid for his staff out of his own pocket. • The EOP was established in 1939 but it gets reorganized with every president. • Some major actors in the EOP: • National Security Council • Office of Management and Budget • Council of Economic Advisors
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) • Hugely influential. • Prepares the budget that President submits to Congress. • Federal agencies will submit their budget requests to OMB, who will decide whether to include that in the President’s budget. • Oversees how funds are spent. • Conducts “cost-benefit” analyses of proposed regulations.
Cabinet Departments There are 15 Cabinet Departments (also known as the Executive Departments). • A picture of Obama’s original cabinet: • Trivia: 1 out of 14 is not a “Secretary.” Who? The AG.
Structure (cont.) • Cabinet secretaries have broad missions and often a political focus. • They: • Are appointed by President and confirmed by Senate. • Have short tenure. • Have high profile. • Criteria: • Usually from the President’s party. • Often were political supporters. • Diversity often a factor. • Usually quite competent.
Cabinet (cont.) • The president has the last word, regardless of what cabinet Secretaries tell him. • Famous story about Lincoln and the Emancipation Proclamation: • After all 7 of his cabinet Secretaries voted “nay,” Abe said “Seven nays, one aye, the ayes have it.”
Independent regulatory commissions • Some examples: the Fed, SEC, and FTC • They typically protect some portion of the economy. • They resolve disputes. They have have enforcement authority. They can punish people. • Heads appointed by President, confirmed by Senate. Fixed terms, usually staggered. Theoretically less political.
Independent agencies • Independent agencies (not to be confused with independent commissions) have -- • Smaller, more focused mission • Leadership appointed by President and confirmed by Senate, but they are not part of the Cabinet. Longer tenure, less political. • No enforcement authority. • Examples: NASA, National Science Foundation.
Government corporations • Examples: Amtrak and Postal Service • Why are they formed? • Good question. (Thanks.) In theory they have the nimbleness of a private-sector corporation while doing something that people want the government to do.
Possible problems with bureaucracies • Lack of resources. • Take banking as an example. • The largest banks will have 100,000 employees and over $1 trillion in assets. • They will be examined by maybe 100 bank examiners.
Possible problems (cont.) • Discretion is exercised at all levels of an agency. • The heads can “slow walk” a direction from the President. Ex: Geithner and dissolving Citigroup. • “Street-level bureaucrats” (i.e., government employees who have a lot of direct contact with people) also have to exercise discretion.
Possible problems (cont.) Regulatory capture • When an agency becomes dominated by the industry that it is supposed to regulate. • Why does it happen? • Human nature/play nice • Mismatch of resources • Need support of industry • Desire not to make waves • Etc.
So Why Delegate So Much Power? • Given all these potential pitfalls, why does Congress delegate so much power to the agencies? • Three main reasons: • Congress lacks the expertise • Congress lacks the time • Congress wants to avoid blame
How is the bureaucracy kept in line? First, through Congress’scontrol of the money. • Never underestimate the “power of the purse.”
Herding cats: Congress (cont.) Three other big powers: • The Senate gets to confirm (or not) nominees for the heads of the agencies. Gets to shape direction of agency (sort of). • Congress can always amend an agency’s power through legislation. • And, as we saw when studying Congress, nothing focuses the attention like a good oversight hearing. Ex: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TC0AKNQBV80 (Sec’y Clinton Benghazi hearing)
What can the President do? • Reorganizeentire agencies. Ex: DHS. • Issue Executive Orders. • Alter an agency’s budget (although Congress is the final say). The President, through OMB, can whittle away at a proposed budget.
Civil Service Then: • TJ fired a lot of federalists; political party was important to getting and keeping a job. • Andrew Jackson took this a step further by using the “spoils system.” Now: • Pendleton Act: Can’t hire or fire for political reasons. Civil service jobs are to be awarded based on merit. • Hatch Act: Federal workers can’t campaign while at work or run for office.
Civil Service (cont.) • People get their federal jobs now through a competition. • Hiring and firing is done on merit. • Office of Personnel Management will send top 3 names to the agency seeking to fill a vacancy. Your reward for making it this far: another random (but amazing) animal photo: (see next slide)