1 / 15

Changes in Fracture Aperture During Hydraulic Well Tests

Changes in Fracture Aperture During Hydraulic Well Tests. Larry Murdoch, Todd Schweisinger Erik Svenson, Leonid Germanovich Supported by NSF EAR 0001146. Moisture in sheet fracture. Hydraulically active sheet fractures. Field Measurements. Device Anchor LVDT Reference rod Function

nat
Download Presentation

Changes in Fracture Aperture During Hydraulic Well Tests

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Changes in Fracture Aperture During Hydraulic Well Tests Larry Murdoch, Todd Schweisinger Erik Svenson, Leonid Germanovich Supported by NSF EAR 0001146

  2. Moisture in sheet fracture

  3. Hydraulically active sheet fractures

  4. Field Measurements • Device • Anchor • LVDT • Reference rod • Function • Change well pressure • Aperture changes • Anchors displace • LVDT signals

  5. Extensometer LR-4

  6. Conditions at field site, Well LR-4 Flowmeter Packer-slug Borehole video Saprolite Frx Frx Depth (m) Frx Gneiss

  7. Packer-air slug tests at 25 m

  8. Open-hole Constant-rate pumping Displacement at 25 m

  9. Compliance

  10. Vertical Compressibility, Storativity Flowmeter Packer-slug Frx’d Rock Saprolite Frx Frx Depth (m) Frx Sopen hole = 5.0x10-4 - 7.0x10-4 Gneiss

  11. Conceptual Model

  12. d P s P s P s P P p s P P P P d P P s P P P P Theoretical Model P,P:Continuity in finite difference s:Estress-displacement d:Sneddon integral, semi-analytical

  13. Calibration Using Implicit Filtering Kn=1.28x109 (Pa/m); Aperture 283 mm Crossing fracture at 30 m

  14. Conclusions 1. Feasible to measure changes in fracture aperture during hydraulic well tests. • Displacements on the order of 1-5 mm/m • Theoretical analysis capable of predicting observations. • Feasible to invert theoretical analysis using displacement data. Possible applications: Storativity, effective aperture, pressure sensitive transmissivity, locations of crossing fractures.

  15. Predicted response

More Related