1 / 46

BIOCEN Summer School Valladolid 2011 Work group : Krzysztof Piotrowski Student group :

Technological strategies for biohydrogen production. BIOCEN Summer School Valladolid 2011 Work group : Krzysztof Piotrowski Student group : Natalia Alonso-Movilla Christoph Krüger Lina Glittmann Inka Mella Agnieszka Korus Ewa Borowska. Contents. Introduction Fermentative process

nate
Download Presentation

BIOCEN Summer School Valladolid 2011 Work group : Krzysztof Piotrowski Student group :

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Technological strategies for biohydrogen production BIOCEN SummerSchool Valladolid 2011 Workgroup: KrzysztofPiotrowski Studentgroup: Natalia Alonso-Movilla ChristophKrüger Lina Glittmann Inka Mella AgnieszkaKorus EwaBorowska

  2. Contents • Introduction • Fermentativeprocess • Feedstock • Bioreactors • Kinetics • Adaptation of existingplants

  3. Hydrogen – General information • Energy carrier • Clean fuel: No CO2 emissions • Used in fuel cells • High energy yield: 122 kJ/g • More orless 3 times greaterthanhydrocarbonfuels • Producedfrom a wide variety of primary energy sources • 5 % fromrenewablessources

  4. European hydrogen infrastructure and production • European distribution of hydrogen demonstration projects Source: www.roads2hy.com

  5. Role of hydrogen in the future • Key technology for future sustainable energy supply. Source: Int. J. Hydrogen Energ 2010; 74:16-26

  6. Hydrogen from biomass • Pathways from biomass to hydrogen: • Fermentative technologies can contribute to a future sustainable hydrogen economy Source: Int. J. Hydrogen Energ 2010; 74:16-26

  7. Raw materials for biohydrogen production Categorized as: Lignocellulosicbiomass (i.e. grass, wood, straw), Starchy biomass (i.e. potato, cereals, food, starch-based wastewater), Sucrose containing biomass (i.e. sugar beet, sugar cane, sweet sorghum), Waste oil (POME),

  8. Characteristic data of selected kinds of biomass. Source: Journal of cleaner production, Raw materials for fermantative production.

  9. In Castile and Leon… • Agriculture-basedeconomy. • Main sourse of organicwaste: • swine manure, poultry manure, cow manure, • fruit wastes, industry (winery, wood). • The crops cultivated: • cereals (Wheat), • legume, • sunflower.

  10. Estimated production yields of anaerobic reactors treating agricultural waste. Source: Hydrogen production from agrocultural waste by dark fermentation: review.

  11. Factors influencingfermentative biohydrogen production

  12. Culture pH • Influence on • hydrogenase activity • metabolism pathway

  13. Hydraulic retention time • Depends on different metabolisms • Inhibits or terminates methanogenesis • Ranges from a few minutes to several hours

  14. Hydrogen partial pressure • Hydrogen partial pressure ↗ Hydrogen yield ↘ • Excess of the hydrogen must be removed from the system to maintain hydrogen production • Solution: lowering dissolved H2 with N2

  15. Nutrients • Necessary supplements: nitrogen, phosphate and other inorganic species • Norg better than Ninorg • Excess of phosphate may favor VFAs and hydrogen production over solvents production • Inorganic ions: Mg2+, Na+, Zn2+, Fe2+

  16. Temperature • Mesophilic range (around 37 0C) and thermophilic range (around 55 0C) • T↗improvement of hydrogen production, T↗ ↗ (out of the range) decrease in hydrogen production

  17. Seed culture • Clostridium and Enterobacter are themost widely used as inoculum • Problem of pureculturesormixedcultures • Mixedcultures aremore practical Clostridium bifermentans (spores) Source: http://bacterioweb.univ-fcomte.fr/

  18. Kinetic model • Mathematical models based on experiments • Description of reaction processes conditions influence of inhibitors /activators • generalized  Application in similar reactions

  19. Gompertz model Type of mathematical model for time-dependend functions Here: Kinetic model for Batch fermentative H2-production processes Source: Int. J. (2009) 33:13-23 • Describes the cumulative H2-Production (H) over the cultivation time t • the lag time (λ) stands for the period until the Production starts • The slope (Rm) describes the Production rate • The maximum potential production (P) is described by the upper Asymptote lag time (λ) slope (Rm) Max. potential production (P)

  20. Gompertz model Advantages • Accurate • Easy to adopt • Universal • Constants have biological meaning  better understanding of a process • Widely used H(t)=H2-production in ml over cultivation time (t) in h P=Potential (ml) Rm=Rate (ml/h) λ =Lag time (h) e=Euler‘s Number (e = 2.71828...) Rm e P H(t) - t λ P Source: Int. J. (2009) 33:13-23

  21. H2fromglucosebatchfermentationParameter • Temperature : Best 41°C // cost-effective 35°C • Cultivation: pH 7 // enhancement: pH 3 • Withoutsludgepreacidification • Pretreatmenttostopmethanogens: BSR: “bacterial stress respond-mechanism" • Best treatment methods: chemical acidification Text: Appl M. Biot. (2002) 58:224-228 Text: Appl M. Biot. (2006) 72:635-643 Abb.: Int. J. (2006) 78:0-5

  22. H2fromglucosebatchfermentationResults • Clostridium butyricum • No methane production • H2 yield below the yields of pure Clostridium cultures • Example cattle manure: • H2 yield: up to 430ml/g VSS • Lag time: around 8h • Rate: 35 ml/h Appl M. Biot. (2006) 72:635-643

  23. Sucrose/Food waste/NFDM results • Variation: Substrate concentration • Low pH <4 : inhibition • Productivity depends on substrates concentration • organic acids Int. J. (2006) Wen-Hsing Chen

  24. Starch/glycerol results • Variation: different Inoculum • no production from oil • Sludge influences starch • Activated inoculum (better • 1,3 propanediol from glycerol Int. J. (2009) Yohei Akutsu

  25. Glycerolresults • Variable: Sludge concentration • By-products: butyric acid, acetic acid and 1.3 propanediol • low concentration 1,16 g VSS/L • No limitation from nitrogen

  26. Glycerol results Int. J. (2009) K. Seifert

  27. Bioreactors used for biohydrogen production

  28. Anaerobic digestion plant a/b/c: Vertical, completely-stirred tank reactor (a/b: mechanical stirring; c: biogas mixing),

  29. Anaerobic digestion plant d/e: Horizontal plug-flow reactor (mechanical stirring)

  30. Biogas plants for hydrogen production – new possibilities…

  31. Hydrogen production in the biogas plant

  32. Hydrogen producers • Species for mesophilicfermentation - Clostridium (C.pasteurianum, C.saccharobutylicum, C. butyricum), Enterobacter (E. aerogenes) and Bacillus • Species for thermophilicfermentation – Thermoanaerobacteriumthermosaccharolyticum, Caldicellulosiruptor (C. saccharolyticus, C. thermocellum), Bacillus thermozeamaize

  33. Hydrogen yield depends on: • Feedstock type • Process conditions • Reactor construction • Presence of H2 consumers and metabolic competitors

  34. H2consumers and thetreatmentmethods

  35. Homoacetogenic bacteria • Anaerobic microorganisms which catalyze the formation of acetate from H2 and CO2. • They decrease significantly the hydrogen yield. Hydrogen is consumed by acetogenic bacteria. • Prevention method: • Heating pretreatment –do not remove some Clostridium • Operating parameters e.g. removing CO2

  36. H2 consumers and thetreatmentmethods

  37. Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) • The most efficient biochemical reaction usinghydrogen involves the sulfate/nitrate-reducing microorganisms. • Under sulfate-rich conditions – hydrogen (also CO2 and VFA)is immediately consumed. • Prevention method: maintain pH lower than 6

  38. H2 consumers and thetreatmentmethods

  39. Methanogens (MPB) • Main hydrogen consumers • Prevention methods: • Chemical inhibition – Bromoethanesulfonate (BES), acetylene and chloroform. Not environmental friendly and too expensive. • Low pH maintaining – most methanogens can grow only at pH between 6-8. In absence of pH control during a batch process, an acidic initial pH is strongly recommended. • Heat treatment of the inoculum– 100ᵒC for 10 min – methanogens do not sporulateand do not survive such conditions. The most common treatment. • Short hydraulic retention time – methanogens are unable to create biofilm because of a low growh rate so they can be washed out of the reactor. In most cases – retention time less than 6h.

  40. Metabolic competitors

  41. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) • Replacement of hydrogen fermentation by lactic acid fermentation. • Prevention method: increaseinthetemperature above 50ᵒC. • Growth of LAB can be limited only in thermophilic fermentation.

  42. Hydrogen vs Methane… Heat value per mass unit H2 CH4 141.88MJ/kg 52.21MJ/kg

  43. But… Heat value per volume unit H2 CH4 12,84MJ/m3 40,78MJ/m3

  44. Yield… swine manure food waste H2 209ml/gVS 196ml/gVS CH4 266ml/gVS 229ml/gVS

  45. Efficiency vs ecology • Hydrogen yield and heat value per volume is lower than methane – less energy can be obtain from biomass. BUT… • Hydrogen combustion does not contribute air contamination – the only product of the reaction is WATER.

  46. Recomention of biohydrogen plant for Castile and Leon region. • Agriculturaldomination of wheatwithmaincomponentglucose. • Optimalconditions: pH 6, temperature 35 0C, process time up to 60 h. • Type of inocculum: Clostridiumbutyricum • Preteatmentmethod: • Bioreactor: possibility of adaptation of existingbiogas plant for biohydrogenproduction.

More Related