320 likes | 672 Views
10-1-04. 2. So much has changed, yet much remains the same. Although the concept of total rehabilitation has been proven by experience to be good business, policies and attitudes among employers, the employees (themselves), insurance companies, unions, hospitals, doctors, attorneys (plaintiffs and
E N D
1. 10-1-04 1 Vocational Rehabilitation in Michigan Workers’ Compensation: From “Soup” (for the Soul) to “Nuts” (and bolts)
2. 10-1-04 2 So much has changed, yet much remains the same… “Although the concept of total rehabilitation has been proven by experience to be good business, policies and attitudes among employers, the employees (themselves), insurance companies, unions, hospitals, doctors, attorneys (plaintiffs and defendants alike) and the general public – these policies and attitudes tend to discourage rehabilitation.
“Getting the injured employee back to work should be the number one objective of the workmen’s compensation system.” –Workmen’s Compensation Dept. Director, William R. Hart, 1962
3. 10-1-04 3 Workers’ Compensation Agency Mission Statement
4. 10-1-04 4 Workers’ Compensation Agency Vision
5. 10-1-04 5 Agency News Hearing Site Consolidations (10-1-04)
Ann Arbor site moves to Detroit
Battle Creek site moves to Kalamazoo
Muskegon site consolidated with Grand Rapids
Lansing hearing site moved
From Okemos to Downtown Lansing, Ottawa State Offices
WCAC relocated to Ottawa State Office
6. 10-1-04 6 State Average Weekly Wage Minimum & Maximum
7. 10-1-04 7 Customer Service & Contested Case Section Bureau’s Hotline – 1(888)396-5041
- Follow-up on constituent inquiries
Attempt to resolve problems prior to any litigation
Health Care Service Rule facilitations
- 104B hearings
Vocational Rehabilitation
David Campbell, Vocational Rehabilitation Consultant
Process all Applications for Mediation or Hearing – approximately 30,000 in fy 03.
Serve all magistrate/mediator decisions
8. 10-1-04 8 REQUEST FOR REHAB UPDATE (BWC-110)
9. 10-1-04 9 The Mediation Process Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Client may or may not have attorney
May involve both attorneys, claimant, adjuster, and family members
Informal process, not on the record
Facts are presented by parties; mediator listens, asks questions, provides some input
Ultimate goal: Agreement by all parties, not necessarily an “order”
10. 10-1-04 10 Claims Assigned to Mediation In response to a decrease in the number of mediators (Nov. ’02), only the following claims are assigned to mediation:
Unrepresented parties
Closed period claims
Medical-only claims
Penalty-only applications
Rate Issues
Vocational Rehabilitation/First Level Hearings
11. 10-1-04 11 Resolution of Workers’ Compensation Claims Withdrawal/Dismissal (23%)
Voluntary Payment (12%)
Redemption/Lump Sum Settlement (59%)
Opinion/Order (6%)
12. 10-1-04 12 Vocational Rehab Defined “The coordinated and systematic process of professional services to enable and sustain the employment of an injured worker. The basic components of vocational rehabilitation services are vocational assessment, goal-setting, service planning, case management, service delivery, job placement, and follow-up.” –Task Force on Vocational Rehabilitation in Workers’ Compensation, 2000
13. 10-1-04 13 VR Division Responsibilities Ensuring that employers provide rehabilitation services according to the provisions of the Act, and that the injured employees accept such services.
Housed within the Customer Service/ Contested Cases Division
Handling customer service calls/concerns daily (VR letters, vendor issues, etc.)
Approving VR facilities, and monitoring practices of those currently approved
Mailing “Right to Vocational Rehabilitation” letters to claimants
Holding VR hearings across the state to determine compliance with Section 319
14. 10-1-04 14 3-Step Approach to VR RTW with same employer, same or different job, within ee’s capabilities
Direct job placement to appropriate alternative employment in community, or short-term retraining up to 52 weeks (with possibility of add’l 52 weeks)
Self-employment ventures (last resort in most cases)
15. 10-1-04 15 New Processes New “Med Management Do’s & Don’ts letter
VR Letter now goes out in 120 Days
Why? Early Intervention is THE KEY to effective management of disability
New Reporting Procedures:
Monthly provider closure codes
Monthly provider report format
Provider Visits
Review Practices/Compliance with Bureau and professional obligations
Maintain open lines of communication and support
VR 2nd Level Hearing “Pre-Conferences”
16. 10-1-04 16 RIGHT TO VOC REHAB LETTER
17. 10-1-04 17 Current Stats VR case closures for fiscal year 2004 (incomplete)
18. 10-1-04 18
19. 10-1-04 19 PERCENTAGE REPORTING FY04
20. 10-1-04 20 Relevant Cases Nessel v. Schenck Pegasus
Defendants wanted Mr. Nessel to meet with their VR expert as part of pretrial discovery in order to determine extent of disability based on Sington case.
WCAC reversed magistrate’s denial of discovery, saying that the burden of proof under Sington makes it critical to determine claimant’s qualifications/training, and how this effects claimant’s ability to work and earn wages.
Significant because rules of discovery per Michigan court rules don’t apply in WC—however, WCAC now says it is under the proper circumstances.
21. 10-1-04 21 Relevant Cases Suliman v. Ann Arbor Ceiling & Partition (2004)
Fell from scaffolding, injured left arm
Benefits terminated when he refused the services of a medical case manager.
Defendants also argued he wasn’t VR candidate, as he had not reached MMI, nor were they happy with the fact that plaintiff had chosen the VR provider.
Magistrate denied these positions; WCAC affirmed.
The Act does not allow for the termination of benefits on the basis of “non-cooperation with a case manager”.
MMI does not have to be reached before beginning a rehab program
22. 10-1-04 22
Charles Sington v. Chrysler Corporation (July ’02)
General background:
Worked as floater for 15 yrs.; picked up parts 30lbs.; injured L shoulder. Later injured R shoulder in non-work injury.
Each time, employer able to accommodate; same wages; Then had a non-work stroke and never returned to work.
Basis: Sington said that he was still disabled from his work-related shoulder, and that work he was doing at the time was “favored work.” Therefore, under 301(5), he had lost his job for “whatever reason” and should be paid benefits. However, Supreme Court remanded case and benefits were not awarded. Relevant Cases
23. 10-1-04 23 Specific Sington Determinations: Has plaintiff established the universe of jobs for which he is qualified and trained, as well as how much the jobs pay?
Has plaintiff established a work-related physical or mental impairment which prevents him from performing jobs within his qualifications and training and which is causing him to lose wages?
Has plaintiff established that he was either unable to perform the jobs within his qualifications and training or that he was unable to obtain such jobs because they were not reasonably available?
24. 10-1-04 24 Sington and the WC Act Is a “Sington Eval” voc rehab, as defined in Sec. 319?
Not in our opinion.
Purpose under Sington is not to rehabilitate per se, but to provide evidence and information regarding the broadest array of jobs within qualifications and training (I.e., Labor Market Survey)
If not, what do we call it?
We might call it Forensic Evaluation, in that it is used to produce objective findings which may or may not include examination of the individual with a disability (from CRCC Code of Ethics)
VR counselors could be used to provide expert vocational testimony as to the employability and placeability of the client given his/her qualifications and training.
Many times, your eval may be used to open a formal VR case.
25. 10-1-04 25 Ideas on Approaching Sington: Determine the scope of your interaction with Sington-related work
Will you, or won’t you do the evals
What will your eval encompass
When asked to do a Sington Eval, and it is not within your scope, your options might be:
Turn down the referral
Tell the referral source that you’ll do it, but only within your scope of practice
26. 10-1-04 26 EMPLOYEE MOST FAQ & CONCERNS “My adjuster won’t call me back”
“My check is late!”
“How far do I have to drive to look for work?”
“What if I find a job that pays less?”
“How can I get retrained for another occupation?”
“I have been in VR job placement for 2 years now, and haven’t found a job. Is this a long time?”
Want to go back to work, but employer won’t let them until 100%
My nurse case manager says I have to let them attend my doc appointments.
27. 10-1-04 27 VR COUNSELOR MOST FREQUENT ISSUES “Is there a defined radius of travel for clients?”
“The plaintiff attorney is asking for a copy of my records. Do I have to give them?”
“Plaintiff attorney won’t let me meet with client.”
28. 10-1-04 28 Specific Concerns Today: Adjusters cutting benefits for “non-cooperation with VR”
Benefits cut for marginal reasons (i.e., didn’t “make weight”)
Job Placement for 2 years or more continuously
Keeping VR files open just because the “account” says so, even when it’s of no help to client.
Counselor making recommendation to adjuster to “file for hearing”
Getting involved in settlement discussions
No apparent client input into written rehab plan
29. 10-1-04 29 The Soap Box… Vocational Rehabilitation Counseling is a noble profession, but often thankless.
It requires tactfulness, patience, compassion, loads of energy, empathy, and courage.
As a counselor, you subscribe to a professional process, with defined steps, services, and goals. But you’re dealing with people, so the process must stay flexible in order to stay on track.
30. 10-1-04 30 The Soap Box… There are multiple players = external pressures trying to direct flow
Difficult at times to remember that there is only one true “Client”
Above all, you listen. Sometimes it’s happy stuff. Most of the time it is a concern, a problem, or a crisis in your client’s life. This is the key to your job though, it’s what sets you apart…You’re a COUNSELOR!
31. 10-1-04 31 It’s Rehabilitation COUNSELING, not Rehabilitation Placement! The fact that you are a counselor makes you different from other “specialists”
We are forced to decide at times (by these external pressures) whether we should compromise the process and our ethics
As long as there are those in our field who will shortcut the process, there will be those looking for their services. Don’t be one of them, and change the system.
Don’t get caught up in the “NASCAR Mentality”
32. 10-1-04 32
33. 10-1-04 33 How Do YOU Provide Voc Rehab?