440 likes | 624 Views
Overview of stone management in Japan. The 10 th Catholic International Urology Symposium, 2008 14 June 2008 Catholic University, Seoul. Tetsuro Matsumoto, MD, PhD Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health. Incidence and management of stone
E N D
Overview of stone management in Japan The 10th Catholic International Urology Symposium, 2008 14 June 2008 Catholic University, Seoul Tetsuro Matsumoto, MD, PhD Department of Urology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health UOEHurology
Incidence and management of stone diseases in Japan UOEHurology
First diagnosis Reccurence Incidence rate (/year) Male 192.0 116.9 308.9 Female 79.3 40.3 119.6 Incidence rate of urinary stone in Japan(/100,000population) 2005 UOEHurology
Incidence rate in whole life (Incidence/year x average life expectancy x 100) 1995 Male: 122.6/100,000×76.36×100= 9.4% Female: 49.4/100,000×82.84×100= 4.1% 2005 Male: 192.0/100,000×78.53×100=15.1% Female: 79.3/100,000×85.49×100= 6.8% UOEHurology
Incidence rate of upper urinary tract stone Incidence (/100,000) Male Female Total Incidence after demographycal correction Male Female Total UOEHurology
Chronological change of incidence rate classified by age (Every 10 years) Male Female UOEHurology
Incidence of upper urinary stone classified by age (First diagnosis/Recurrence) (/100,000) Male first Female first Male recurrence Female recurrence First:Recurrence Male Female UOEHurology
Constituent of upper urinary tract stone in Japam 2005 Male Female Others Urate stone Others Urate stone Cystine Infection stone Infection stone Cystine Castone Castone UOEHurology
Constituent of lower urinary tract stone in Japan 2005 Male Female Cystine Cystine Urate stone Urate stone Infection stone Castone Infection stone Castone UOEHurology
Chronological change of constituent of upper urinary tract stone classified by age Male Others Cystine Urate Struvite Ca stone Female UOEHurology
Past history and basic disease in patients 2005 • Rate (%) Basic disease History Rate (%) Family history9.7 Hypertension21.7 Diabetes9.8 Hyperlipidemia14.1 Osteoporosis2.0 Hyperuricemia Hypercalciuria Hyperuricuria Hyperoxaluria Hypocitruria 13.7 3.1 3.2 1.5 2.0 UOEHurology
Management of stone diseases in Japan ESWL + TUL ESWL only TUL only Others Total No. (%) ESWL + TUL TUL only ESWL only UOEHurology
Chronological change of surgical management for upper urinary tract stones Open surgery TUL or PNL ESWL (incl. combined) % Surgical treatment % No surgical treatment UOEHurology
Japanese guidelines for the management of stone diseasesDec, 2002, JUA • Renal stone • (1)<20mm; ESWL • (2)>20mmor Staghorn; PNLwith ESWL • Ureter stone • (1) Proximal;ESWLOption: (TUL, PNL) • (2)Middle;TUL or ESWL • (3)Distal;<10mm; ESWL • >10mm; TUL UOEHurology
Experience in our hospital UOEHurology
The UOEH urolithiasis guideline UOEH hospital Renal stones (1) 5 to 20mm; ESWL Option:(PNL or TUL) (2)20mmto 30mm ; ESWL with double-J stent Option:(PNL or TUL) (3)>30 mm; PNL (with ESWL) Option:(lithotomy) Ureter stones (A) Proximal; ESWLOption:(TUL or PNL) (B) Middle;ESWL (C) Distal; (1) 5 to 10mm; ESWL (2)>10mm; TUL UOEHurology
Number of new patients in Urology service in outpatient clinic in UOEH hospital UOEH hospital Others Stones year Around 10% is stone diseases UOEHurology
Location of stones UOEH hospital Bladder Ureter Kidney year UOEHurology
Ureteral stone Stone Passage Rate (Meta analysis) Spontaneous passage <5mm; 68% >5mm, <10mm; 47% Medical treatment to increase passage (MET) Nifedipine (Ca channel blocker); 9% (not significant) a-blocker; 29%(significant) Tamsulosin (20% increase)> Nifedipine (significant) 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi (EAU, AUA) UOEHurology
No. of patients received surgical management UOEH hospital No surgery Surgery year UOEHurology
2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi (EAU, AUA) Nonpregnant adult Unilateral noncystine/nonuric acid radiopaque stone Normal contralateral renal function Healthy patient Index Patient For all index patients Standard; Bacteriuria should be treated. (IV) Blind basket catheter should not be performed.(IV) For ureteral stones <10mm Option; Observation with periodic evaluation. (1A) Standard; Should be counseled on the risks of MET. (IV) For ureteral stones >10mm Standard; Must be informed about active treatment modality. (IV) Recommendation; SWL and URS first-line treatment (1A-IV) Routine stenting is not recommended (III) Option; Stenting following uncomplicated URS is optional (1A) Percutaneous antegrade ureteroscopy is first-line treatment inselected patients (III) ; impact large stoen in upper ureter, combination with renal stone removal, ureteral stone after urinary diversion, failure of retrograde ureteral access. UOEHurology
Surgical management UOEH hospital Vesicolithotomy Ureterolithotomy Pyelolithotomy Vesicolithotripsy year UOEHurology
Stone free rates for SWL and URS in the overall population Overall population Distal ureter Distal ureter <10mm Distal ureter >10mm Mid ureter Mid ureter <10mm Mid ureter >10mm Proximal ureter Proximal ureter <10mm Proximal ureter >10mm SWL 74% 86% 74% 73% 84% 76% 82% 90% 68% URS 94% 97% 93% 86% 91% 78% 81% 80% 79% Statistics significant significant significant ns ns ns ns ns significant 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi (EAU, AUA) UOEHurology
Results of TUL(2005~2007) UOEH hospital Cases Stone free rate U1 15 11(73%) U2 9 5(56%) U3 24 22(91.6%) UOEHurology
Conversion from ESWLto TUL UOEH hospital ESWLcases Conversion to TUL 2 (2.4%) 81 2005 82 7 (8.5%) 2006 2007 4 (6.6%) 60 Total 223 13 (5.8%) UOEHurology
A case of problem stone Patient; 61y, Female Present illness: Recurrent UTI for 3 years & Lt hydronephrosis due to Lt ureter stone (U1) Past history;Kaiser ope 2 times. Ope for Abdominal wall hernia Complication; Obese Ope scar UOEHurology
CT DIP 22×12mm Impacted stone UOEHurology
Option of management (U1;Impacted stone) ESWL; High failure rate to impacted stone TUL; Difficulty of keeping optical view or push upto kidney PNL;Damage of Lt kidney Operation performed; Retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy
12mmport 5mmport × × N × Retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy Lt ureter Ureterotomy Stone
3months after ope 2 weeks after ope Retroperitoneal laparoscopipc ureterolithotomy is one of option for long-term impacted stone.
Stone disease is infectious diseases? UOEHurology
UTI and urinary stone are closely related. Urinary stone induces UTI. UTI causes urinary stone. UOEHurology
All kind of human diseases is closely related with infection? Cancer: Uterine cervical cancer;Human papilloma virus Liver cancer; Hepatitis virus C Gastric cancer; Helicobacter pyroli Renal cancer; Virus? Arteriosclerosis,Myocardial infarction; Chlamydophylapneumoniae Many kinds of autoimmune diseases, Collagen diseases Benign prostatic hyperplasia etc, etc Urinary stone is also infectious disease? UOEHurology
Stone diseases are infectious diseases? • Urea splitting enzyme producing-microorganism; • Struvite stone • Nanobacteria; Apatite stone • Oxalobacter formigenes; Prevent stone • formation due to diminish the • absorption and excretion of • oxalate UOEHurology
Urea splitting enzyme-producing bacteria causes struvite stone UOEHurology
Urease –producing bacteria Many kinds of urea splitting enzyme -producing bacteria; cause complicated UTI. Almost all producing Sometimes producing Microorganism GNR GPC Mycoplasma Fungi UOEHurology
While struvite stoneis caused by UTI, Apatite stone is also caused by infection? UOEHurology
Nanobacteria Kajander & Ciftcioglu (Finnish researcher, PNAS 1998) -Putative cell-walled microorganism -Low diameter; 0.2mm -Apparent culture -Partially characterized Ribosomal RNA -Isolated from human and cow blood -Microscopic mineral structure (Ca, P) =Biomineralization -Not culturable in g irradiated blood UOEHurology
Nanobacteria; Small, Gram negative Proteobacteria group Needle-shaped calcium apatite cell wall UOEHurology
Nanobacteria; an infectious cause for kidney stone formation;Ciftcioglu et al; Kidney Int 1999 SEM;70/72 (97.2%) stones were Nanobacteria positive. UOEHurology
Nanobacteria; Controversial pathogens in nephrolithiasis and polycystic kidney disease. Kajander et al; Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2001 Direct injection of nanobateria into kidney resulted in stone formation in rats and rabbits UOEHurology
Nanobac Announces peer reviewed publication verifying self-propagating calcifying nanoparticles as a unique entity CNPs hypothesized to resemble prions CAL-DETOX; EDTA Nanobac Pharmaceuticals Inc. UOEHurology
Controversial issue Cisar J. (NIH, FDA group;PNAS2000) -Found same structure in same condition -rRNA=Phyllobacterium mysinacearum; contamination -Resistant to almost all antimicrbials and sodium azide -Non sensitive to heat and powerful respiratory inhibitor UOEHurology
Conclusion Infection is quite interesting. UOEHurology