90 likes | 320 Views
Forensic Odontology. Doyle v. Texas, 1952 first U.S. bite mark case resulting in a conviction Doyle was convicted of burglary based on a bite mark left in a piece of partially eaten cheese at the crime scene. Ted Bundy broke into Florida State University’s Chi Omega sorority house
E N D
Doyle v. Texas, 1952 • first U.S. bite mark case resulting in a conviction • Doyle was convicted of burglary based on a bite mark left in a piece of partially eaten cheese at the crime scene
Ted Bundy • broke into Florida State University’s Chi Omega sorority house • bludgeoned and strangled Lisa Levy and Margaret Bowman to death • bit Levy on her left buttock leaving an obvious bite mark impression
Bite mark evidence and testimony in Bundy case Victims Lisa Levy and Margaret Bowman
Notorious Figures in History Who Have Been Identified Through Forensic Dentistry • John Wilkes Booth (shot and killed Abraham Lincoln) • Adolf Hitler and wife, Eva Braun • Joseph Mengele (Nazi “Angel of Death”) • Lee Harvey Oswald (assassinated John F. Kennedy) • Czar Nicholas II and his family
Wrongly Convicted • Ray Krone • Labeled “the snaggle tooth killer” • Found guilty of killing a Phoenix, Arizona bartender in 1991 • The woman was found dead at a bar where Krone was known to regularly play darts
His teeth were mistakenly matched to a bite mark left on the victim • Krone spent 10 years in prison, including 2 on death row • In 2002, DNA evidence proved he did not kill the bartender
How did the mistaken match occur? • Why does DNA evidence overrule the bite mark evidence?
Bite mark evidence requires a dentist to compare the bite marks with impressions and come to a conclusion based on what they see • Though the dentist has forensic training and is considered an expert, interpretation hinges on the dentist’s opinion • DNA evidence is interpreted using proven mathematical formulas and statistics