150 likes | 248 Views
Virginia Nutrient Credit Trading: Nonpoint Source Offset Options. Kurt Stephenson Dept of Ag & Applied Economics Virginia Tech Kurts@vt.edu. Virginia Nutrient Credit Trading Program.
E N D
Virginia Nutrient Credit Trading: Nonpoint Source Offset Options Kurt Stephenson Dept of Ag & Applied Economics Virginia TechKurts@vt.edu
Virginia Nutrient Credit Trading Program Establish stringent mass load caps for N and P and to provide point sources compliance options for meeting those load caps.
Trade Design and Sequencing In general, the Virginia nutrient trading program requires point sources to exhaust point source compliance options first before allowing any nonpoint source trades. This applies to both existing and new/expanding point sources.
ExistingPoint Source Compliance • Devise plan to meet wasteload allocation (WLA) (individually or as bubble) • If discharge > WLA, must purchase credits from another point source • If no PS credits available, secure equivalent NPS credit by paying into Virginia Water Quality Program.
New/ExpandingPoint Source Compliance: Offsets • 1A) Meet limit of technology concentration standard for N and P, and • 1B) Acquire WLA to offset new discharge: • Buy WLA from point source • Acquire NPS offset at 2:1 rate • If none above, “other means” • If none above, payments into WQIF
Nonpoint Source Credits/Offsets Nonpoint source credits/offsets are reductions in nutrient load beyond a baseline. Defined in statute as: “achieve reductions beyond those already required by or funded under federal and state law” §62.1-44.19:15.B.1b Must be within same tributary
Nonpoint Source Offsets Any nonpoint source offsets must be included within the point source’s individual VPDES permit. Thus offsets do not represent a transfer of legal responsibility to limit nutrient discharges.
Opequon Project: Evaluating Urban Offset Options Avoiding legal exposure for NPS nonperformance – What potential offset projects could be performed under the local government authority
Opequon Project: Offset Options Being Evaluated • Options: • Urban BMPs (constructed wetlands, wet ponds, bioretention areas, sand filters) • Connecting private septic to public sewer system • Land conversion on land owned or controlled by local government
Opequon Project: Screening Tool Project team developing a cost screening tool that would allow rapid assessment of cost to generate offset for these optionsPlanning, not implementation, tool.
Urban BMPs • Current draft guidelines allow for offsets from enhancing/retrofitting existing stormwater BMPs or stream/wetland restoration. • Urban offset must be • Consistent with Erosion/Sediment Control laws • Consistent with VA’s stormwater management program • Compliant with federal MS4 rules • Consistent with Ches Bay Preservation Act.
Septic Connections • Current draft guidelines allow for offsets from “retrofitting” existing septic systems • EPA has approved increases in wastewater treatment plant’s WLA by connecting existing septics to central sewer. • Nitrogen examples include 20lbs N/yr/septic
Urban Offset Wildcard Proposed Strategy Allocation Reduction Factor (SARF) – A portion of all urban NPS offsets generated will be allocated to achieve tributary strategy goals for urban NPS
NPS Credits:Land Conversion • Conversion of some types of land to less intensive nutrient uses could be eligible for NPS credit. • For example: • Cropland to forest or parkland. • Hayland/pasture to forest or parkland • Fee simple or conservation easement.