1 / 56

U.S. Pork Industry Structure 2006

U.S. Pork Industry Structure 2006. Glenn Grimes Professor Emeritus University of Missouri-Columbia. Website: http://agebb.missouri.edu/mkt/index.htm. Rev 6/19/07. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study , 2006 . Estimated Total Number of US Hog Operations &

nelia
Download Presentation

U.S. Pork Industry Structure 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. U.S. Pork Industry Structure 2006 Glenn Grimes Professor Emeritus University of Missouri-Columbia Website: http://agebb.missouri.edu/mkt/index.htm Rev 6/19/07

  2. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Estimated Total Number of US Hog Operations & Share of US Hogs Slaughtered in 2006 by Size Category University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  3. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Share of US Hogs Slaughtered by Year and Size Category University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  4. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Number of Large Firms Producing Hogs University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  5. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Percent of U.S. Slaughter Hogs Marketed by Large Firms University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  6. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Percent of U.S. Slaughter Hog Marketingsby Type of Owner, 2006 University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  7. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Increase in Marketings Planned 2003-06 in 2003 Study Compared to Actual Marketings 2003-06* *Percent increase in number of head marketed. University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  8. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Increase in Marketings Planned by Size Group, 2006-07 and 2006-09 University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  9. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Percent of Firms Planning to Reduce or Increase Marketings between 2006 and 2009 University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  10. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 How Firms Plan to Expand 2006-09: Percent of Firms Responding in Size Groups University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  11. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 How Firms Plan to Expand 2006-09:Percent of U.S. Hogs Owned by All Firms Reporting University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  12. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Percent of Firms That Made a Profit in 2004 Firm Size (1,000 head mktd. annually) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  13. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Percent of Firms That Made a Profit in 2005 Firm Size (1,000 head mktd. annually) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  14. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Percent of Firms That Made a Profit in 2006 Firm Size (1,000 head mktd. annually) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  15. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Percent of Firms That Started Marketing Hogs Prior to 1975 Firm Size (1,000 head mktd. annually) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  16. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Percent of Firms That Started Marketing Hogs 1976 to 1985 Firm Size (1,000 head mktd. annually) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  17. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Percent of Firms That Started Marketing Hogs 1986 to 1995 Firm Size (1,000 head mktd. annually) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  18. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Percent of Firms That Started Marketing Hogs after 1995 Firm Size (1,000 head mktd. annually) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  19. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Production Information 2006: Percent of Hogs Affected within Size Category University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  20. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Production Information 2006: Percent of All U.S. Hogs Affected University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  21. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Networking Activities of ProducersMarketing 1,000-50,000 Head Annually Percent University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  22. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Hog Operations Producing Other Commodities University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  23. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Litters Sired by Artificial Insemination 1997, 2000, 2003, 2006 University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  24. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Where Firms Acquired Semen (percent of firms responding in size category) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  25. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Firms Finishing Canadian-born Pigs(percent of firms responding in size category) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  26. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Method of Pricing Canadian-born Pigs (percent of firms that fed Canadian pigs by size category) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  27. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 How Firms Marketed Slaughter Hogs, 2006 (percent of firms in size category) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  28. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Number of Different Packers Sold to in 2006 (percent of firms responding in size category) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  29. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Percent of Hogs Sold under Marketing Contracts (percent of total marketings of size category) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  30. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Flexibility in Marketing Dates (percent of firms responding in size category) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  31. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Percent of Hogs Sold on Carcass Merit Basis Firm Size(thousand head mktd. annually) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  32. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Use of Hog Futures Market by Hog Firms (percent of firms responding in size category) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  33. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Why Hog Producers Do Not Use Futures or Options (percent of firms responding in size category) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  34. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Opinions on Marketing Contracts:Help Coordinate Slaughter Firm Size (thousand head mktd. annually) Strongly disagree Strongly agree University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  35. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Opinions on Marketing Contracts:Felt They Were Treated Fairly under Contract Firm Size (thousand head mktd. annually) Strongly disagree Strongly agree University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  36. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Opinions on Marketing Contracts:Plan To Continue Marketing with a Contract Firm Size (thousand head mktd. annually) Strongly disagree Strongly agree University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  37. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Opinions on Marketing Contracts:Should Be More Closely Monitored by USDA Firm Size (thousand head mktd. annually) Strongly disagree Strongly agree University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  38. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Opinions on Marketing Contracts:Prefer To Market All Hogs on Cash Market Firm Size(thousand head mktd. annually) Strongly disagree Strongly agree University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  39. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Opinions on Marketing Contracts:Have Caused Lower Cash Market Prices Firm Size(thousand head mktd. annually) Strongly disagree Strongly agree University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  40. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Opinions on Marketing Contracts:Producers with Contracts Get Higher Prices Firm Size(thousand head mktd. annually) Strongly disagree Strongly agree University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  41. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Opinions on Marketing Contracts:Packers Showed Undue Preferencein Offering Contracts Firm Size (thousand head mktd. annually) Strongly disagree Strongly agree University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  42. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Opinions on Marketing Contracts:Should Be Made Illegal Firm Size (thousand head mktd. annually) Strongly disagree Strongly agree University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  43. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Percent of U.S. Hogs Raised by Firms That Are Contractors, 1997-2006 University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  44. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Percent of U.S. Hogs Raised under Contract, 1997-2006 University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  45. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Average Length of Production Contractsin Months University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  46. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Training and Supervision Provided byContractors to Growers(percent of firms responding in size category) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  47. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 Contractors’ Expectations for Next 5 Years(percent of firms responding in size category) University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  48. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 How satisfied are you with hog production? University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  49. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 How satisfied are contractors with contract hog production? University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

  50. U.S. Pork Industry Structure Study, 2006 How satisfied are growers with contract hog production? University of Missouri, Iowa State University, Pork magazine, Pig Improvement Company, National Pork Board.

More Related