200 likes | 342 Views
REGIONAL-SCALE ENSEMBLE FORECASTS OF THE 7 FEBRUARY 2007 LAKE EFFECT SNOW EVENT. Justin Arnott and Michael Evans NOAA/NWS Binghamton, NY Richard Grumm NOAA/NWS State College, PA George Young Penn State University, University Park, PA NROW IX, 7-8 November 2007. Motivation.
E N D
REGIONAL-SCALE ENSEMBLE FORECASTS OF THE 7 FEBRUARY 2007 LAKE EFFECT SNOW EVENT Justin Arnott and Michael Evans NOAA/NWS Binghamton, NY Richard Grumm NOAA/NWS State College, PA George Young Penn State University, University Park, PA NROW IX, 7-8 November 2007
Motivation Past LES Forecasting LES a Pattern Recognition Problem • GFS unable to resolve bands • Rely on tools such as BUFKIT
Motivation, continued Present/Future LES Forecasting • 12 km NAM grossly resolves lake-parallel bands • Each NWS office can run a local version of this model • Individual runs often have problems with band location/orientation • Can multiple simulations of the NAM (an ensemble) provide added value? • This question has prompted the development of the Northeast Regional Ensemble
What is the Northeast Regional Ensemble? • 12 km Workstation WRF • 24-36 hr run length • 2007-2008: 7-8 Members • 2 CTP members • 1 Operational • Goal: Improve operational forecasts of lake effect snowfall
Case Day: 07FEB2007 • Part of a ~10-day prolific lake effect snow event east of Lake Ontario • Band moved significantly throughout the day • Excellent test for the ensemble
07FEB2007 – Synoptic Setup TLAKE: +4C
Operational NAM Performance • Captures basic band evolution • Slow with initial southward band movement • Problems with inland extent of the band • Frequently too far inland • Can the ensemble add value to this simulation?
Ensemble Performance • All members able to simulate a band • Like NAM, ensemble successfully captures basic band evolution • Probability plots indicate operational NAM an outlier with inland extent • Ensemble provides added value
Individual Member Performance • Quantitatively assess each ensemble member • Method: MODE pattern matching software (Davis et al. 2006) • Identify precipitation “objects” in forecast/observations • Match objects based on different attributes • Distance apart, similarity in area/orientation, overlap • Precipitation Obs: NCEP Stage IV Analysis
Individual Member Performance • Example:
Individual Member Performance • The Statistics: Primary Band Identification • POD/FAR/CSI * 3 hourly time steps
Individual Member Performance • The Statistics: Basic Position/Intensity * 3 hourly time steps
Conclusions • Case study suggests ensemble approach to LES may be valuable • Hone in on high-probability impact areas • Highlight outlier (low-probability) outcomes • Initial Quantitative Analysis shows diversity in “best member” for different variables • Ensemble mean likely to have increased skill over individual members
Contact Info/Acknowledgements • Have Questions? • justin.arnott@noaa.gov Acknowledgements: • Ensemble Participants • For agreeing on a common domain/sharing data • Ron Murphy, ITO BGM • For gathering 7 February 2007 case data • MODE Software designers • http://www.dtcenter.org/met/users/