600 likes | 618 Views
Russian Presentation. Intergovernmental Relationships, Decentralization and Local Governance. Dr. Louis A. Picard Professor of Public and International Affairs and African Studies Graduate School of Public and International Affairs University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA.
E N D
Russian Presentation Intergovernmental Relationships, Decentralization and Local Governance Dr. Louis A. PicardProfessor of Public and International Affairsand African Studies Graduate School of Public and International AffairsUniversity of PittsburghPittsburgh, PA 15260USA
Questions: End of Discussion 1. What major historical factors appear to have defined Governance, Local Government and Civil Society in Russia 2. What factors are unique and different in Russia from Europe and international experiences 3.To what extent is society and culture important at the "country,“ regional and local level?
Theme The Nature of Intergovernmental Relationships
Overview: Historical Patterns of Relations • AT ISSUE - Location of ultimate power and Responsibility • Definition of Power: • The authoritative allocation of values • Balance: Leadership, Authority and Choice
Types of Democracy • South African Kgotla Direct Democracy- Actual direct participation of a population in decision-making about laws, customs and regulations
TYPES OF INTER-GOVERNMENTAL AND INTER-ORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONS Confederation and loose con-federal relationships
The Articles of ConfederationThe Articles of Confederation, drafted in 1777 by the Continental Congress, served as the first Constitution of the United States.
Confederation Relationships Power lies with the sub-units • U.S. Articles of Confederation • Canadian Federation • European Union • Southern African Development Council • Economic Council of West African States • ASEAN • Mercusor
Federalism • Concept: Can Transfer additional authority back to the sub-units but not take power away from the federated governments (Provinces, states) • Principal: Divided Soveregnty
Federal Systems In Federal Relationship • Some power lies with the National Unit • Some power lies with lower units • Layer Cake
Federal Powers • Unique or Exclusive Powers- Federal and State • Concurrent Powers- Federal and State • Devolved Powers- State and Local • Denied Authority
Federal Systems Key Distinction: 1. Lower units cannot break away from the National Unit 2. National Units cannot take power away from the lower units 3. Divided Sovereignty
Federalism: Examples: • USA • Canada • Germany • Nigeria • India • Russian Federation • Austria • Switzerland • Malaysia
Federal Relationships Indian States
Unitary Systems and Sub-regional units • All power ultimately lies at the national level • What power the local level has, is given to it by the national level • The power that the national unit has given to the local level can also be taken away from it
Unitary Systems- Examples • United Kingdom • France • Hungary • Kenya • Japan • South Africa? (Unitary or Quasi-Federal) • Bolivia • China? • Palestine? • Indonesia • Sweden
Subsidiarity: European Union Term • Subsidiarity is the idea that matters should be handled by the smallest (or, the lowest) competent government authority possible. • It is presently best known as a fundamental principle of European Union Law. According to this principle, the EU may only act (i.e. make laws) where member states agree that action of individual countries (or local governments) is insufficient. • Subsidiarity has become a principle of public sector reform in LDCs
Subsidiarity: Summary • Concept: Transfer of authority to a lower level of government • Primary Unit of Government: Lowest level that carries a bureaucracy with it • Alternative Social Service Delivery Systems Debated- eg. Health in USA
Models of Subsidiarity: Review • Devolution: Federal or Unitary (Political) • Deconcentration (Administrative) • Delegation (Special Unit- PAT) • Privatization (Contracting Out) • Program and Project Deconcentration: Principal Agency Issue)
Intergovernmental Relationships Basic Assumptions
Devolution • Transfer to a non-Federal political body e.g. Budget and personal authority to district and town councils Key- power lies with lower level politicians
Deconcentration: Transfer of authority to administrators at lower level within the administrative system
Deconcentration: • Functional vs. Prefectoral • Prefectoral integrated • Prefectoral unintegrated
French Prefect Jura RegionAissa Dermouche (Appointed “Governor”)
Control Systems Functional Home Affairs Local Govt. Public Works Agriculture Education Labor Council Public Works Office District Ag. Office District Ed. Office District Labor Office
Control Systems Prefectoral - Integrated Interior Local Govt. Public Works Agriculture Education Labor District Office District Ag. Office District Ed. Office District Labor Office Public Works Office Council/Chief
Control Systems Prefectoral - Unintegrated Interior Local Govt. Public Works Agriculture Education Labor Police District Office Police Council/ Chief Public Works Office District Ag. Office District Ed. Office District Labor Office
Delegation • Transfer Function Outside of line Departments • Use of Board • Commercialization
Delegation • Transfer of authority to a statutory body such as Public Corporations or parastatals (UK) • Eg. AMTRAK in USA
Privatization • Transfer function out of government sector • More than Contracting Out
Principles of Privatization • Key Conditionality- Privatization of the economy within a context of administrative Reform
Principles of Privatization a. divestiture (full sale) b. contracting out c. liquidation d. sell off public private partnership shares
Principles of Privatization Goal: Small government and return to the recurrent budgeting process and balanced budget principles of “Neo-Orthodox Economists” Fiscal Crisis has both called this into question and supported very small government
Programs and Projects • Program and Project Deconcentration: (Principal Agency Issue) • Assymetric Relationships • Prone to Patron-Clientalism