1 / 24

Non-market contribution to national economy of Polish farming activity

Non-market contribution to national economy of Polish farming activity. Resilience 2014 – Montpellier Rural’Est off-site session Catherine Darrot. Montpelllier – Resilience 2014 Rural’Est off-site session. Origin of the questions.

nibal
Download Presentation

Non-market contribution to national economy of Polish farming activity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Non-market contribution to national economy of Polish farming activity Resilience 2014 – Montpellier Rural’Est off-site session Catherine Darrot

  2. Montpelllier – Resilience 2014 Rural’Est off-site session Origin of the questions • Research in social sciences : questionning public stereotypes • Twostereotypes about smallfamilyfarms in Polandbetween 2003 and 2007 Non-market contribution to national economy of Polish farming activity - Catherine DARROT

  3. Montpelllier – Resilience 2014 Rural’Est off-site session Origin of the questions • Farm land: smallfamilyfarmswereaccused to block farmlandmarket by keeping land, and consequently to limit the potential of development of larger and more active farms • Food market: smallfamilyfarmswereaccused of low contribution to national economybecause of theirlowqualtity of marketedproducts Non-market contribution to national economy of Polish farming activity - Catherine DARROT

  4. Montpelllier – Resilience 2014 Rural’Est off-site session 41 farm monographsfrom 2004 to 2006 : deux modalité de ciblage des exploitations Drobin 8 monogr. Knyszyn, 15 monogr. Data Steszew - 10 monogr. Zator, 10 monogr. Non-market contribution to national economy of Polish farming activity - Catherine DARROT

  5. Montpelllier – Resilience 2014 Rural’Estoff-site session Sample • Farm land: smallfamilyfarmswereaccused to block farmlandmarket by keeping land, and consequently to limit the potential of development of larger and more active farms • Food market: smallfamilyfarmswereaccused of low contribution to national economybecause of theirlowqualtity of marketedproducts Non-market contribution to national economy of Polish farming activity - Catherine DARROT

  6. Montpelllier – Resilience 2014 Rural’Estoff-site session • Typology of the trajectory of those 41 peasant-likefarms (dfMendars) • Twotrajectoriesdriving out of the peasant-like model • « Heritage » farms • Farmsevolvingtoward a specialised/intensified model • Three « peasant-like » trajectories • Semi-subsistencefarms • Intensifiedpeasant-likemarlet-relatedfarm • Diversification of rural activities Non-market contribution to national economy of Polish farming activity - Catherine DARROT

  7. Montpelllier – Resilience 2014 Rural’Estoff-site session Typologie des exploitations : REVENUS Non-market contribution to national economy of Polish farming activity - Catherine DARROT

  8. Montpelllier – Resilience 2014 Rural’Estoff-site session 1st non-marketprocess Farm land transfer Non-market contribution to national economy of Polish farming activity - Catherine DARROT

  9. Montpelllier – Resilience 2014 Rural’Est off-site session Farm Land • One wide-spreadphenomenon: Non-formal land renting • Yearly • From one small, less-active farm to a larger, more active farm Non-market contribution to national economy of Polish farming activity - Catherine DARROT

  10. Montpelllier – Resilience 2014 Rural’Estoff-site session Farm Land • One wide-spreadphenomenon: Non-formal land renting • Reversibility ! When land needed Land back to the smallfarm • (4 cases in oursample = 10 % of the total sample) • Tchayanovian cycle! • Whenfamilygetslarger / whenunemployment (farm = « life inssurance ») Non-market contribution to national economy of Polish farming activity - Catherine DARROT

  11. Montpelllier – Resilience 2014 Rural’Estoff-site session Our sample: Land use of smallfarms withreducedactivity or only for semi-subsistence Non-market contribution to national economy of Polish farming activity - Catherine DARROT

  12. Montpelllier – Resilience 2014 Rural’Estoff-site session Our sample: Land use of farmswith a more significantactivity Non-market contribution to national economy of Polish farming activity - Catherine DARROT

  13. Montpelllier – Resilience 2014 Rural’Estoff-site session Farm Land • One wide-spreadphenomenon: Non-formal land renting • Non-marketprocess • « Active » farmerruns the land for free and keepsit in good conditions • Owner claims EU funds = « Rent» • Cycle: reversibility Non-market contribution to national economy of Polish farming activity - Catherine DARROT

  14. Montpelllier – Resilience 2014 Rural’Estoff-site session 2nd non-marketprocess Food transfer Non-market contribution to national economy of Polish farming activity - Catherine DARROT

  15. Food gifts « Linked-couple/family » support Farm Marketedfarmproducts Marketintermediaryactors Local community Direct marketing of rawfarmproducts 1 3 Potatoes Poultry and eggs Milk 2 Enlargedfamily 4 Market

  16. Montpelllier – Resilience 2014 Rural’Estoff-site session • Crossing • Farmmonographs: Sociologic and economic quantitative and qualitative data • With • - National statistic data: demography of farming and rural sector The food volumes concerned by processes 1 and 2 canbeestimated And framedbetween a ground value and a top value Top value - Maximal number of Polishfarms (source GUS : 2,38 millions) - The volumes of foodconcerned in the familieswherethey are the highest (monographs) • Ground value • Minimal number of Polishfarms (source Eurostat : 1,13 millions) • - The volumes of foodconcerned in the familieswherethey are lower (monographs) Non-market contribution to national economy of Polish farming activity - Catherine DARROT

  17. (Approche anthropologique – Sources : données de terrain de l’auteur)

  18. 41 monographsfamiliales Food autonomy in an « average » Polishfamillyfarm:70 % Non-market contribution to national economy of Polish farming activity - Catherine DARROT

  19. Framing the reality

  20. Montpelllier – Resilience 2014 Rural’Estoff-site session As a carefull indication, the averagebetween the ground and top values are; Wewant to estimatehere the % of the non-matketedPolishfood And the % of the population benefiting of it Carefull:This studydoes not includeurbanfoodgardens, whichalsocontributefor potentially high quantities Non-market contribution to national economy of Polish farming activity - Catherine DARROT

  21. Montpelllier – Resilience 2014 Rural’Est off-site session Question • Those data are not recent • What about the current situation ? Non-market contribution to national economy of Polish farming activity - Catherine DARROT

  22. Montpelllier – Resilience 2014 Rural’Estoff-site session Thankyou for your attention catherine.darrot@agrocampus-ouest.fr Non-market contribution to national economy of Polish farming activity - Catherine DARROT

More Related