460 likes | 553 Views
GSCII Project. Gauging the quality of the GSCII DB with QA_2plates: First results. R. Pennons, R. Morbidelli, A Spagna, M. G.Lattanzi. Diagram of QA_2plates procedures. QA_2Plates First level procedures (connection with CIQA). QA_2Plates: s econd level procedures.
E N D
GSCII Project Gauging the quality of the GSCII DB with QA_2plates: First results R. Pennons, R. Morbidelli, A Spagna, M. G.Lattanzi
The sample of processed plates • NUMBER OF SOURCE PLATES 067 • NUMBER OF PLATE PAIRS QAed 840 • PAIRS OF GSC I-II/GSCII PLTS WITH RELIABLE RESULTS 708335 • PAIRS OF GSC I-II /GSCII PLTS WITH SAME COL.DIFF.AREA 127059 • PAIRS OF GSC I-II /GSCII PLTS WITH SAME AREA DIFF.COL. 091064 • PAIRS OF GSC I-II /GSCII PLTS WITH DIFF.COL.- DIFF.AREA 479212 • PAIRS OF GSC I-II /GSCII WITH SAME COL. AND SAME AREA 011 000
GALACTIC REPRESENTATION OF THE GSCII PLATES AT OATO Source (+) Overlap()
Results from GSCII plate pairs STARS-STARS NON STARS - NON STARS D D D mag D D D mag MEAN VAL.GSCII ALL DATA +0.00 +0.55 -0.00 +0.49 +0.01 +0.47 +0.00 +0.72 -0.00 +0.69 +0.01 +0.59 GSCII ALL DATA +0.42 +0.20 +0.23 +0.17 +1.01 +0.20 +0.38 +0.18 +0.19 +0.17 +1.00 +0.23 MEAN VAL. GSCII SAME COL. +0.02 +0.50 -0.00 +0.44 +0.04 +0.27 +0.02 +0.67 -0.01 +0.61 +0.03 +0.32 OF GSCII SAME COL. +0.51 +0.18 +0.22 +0.15 +0.27 +0.08 +0.48 +0.20 +0.26 +0.17 +0.34 +0.12 MEAN VAL.GSCII SAME AREA +0.00 +0.38 +0.00 +0.36 +0.00 +0.54 +0.00 +0.64 +0.00 +0.63 -0.00 +0.61 OF GSCII SAME AREA +0.15 +0.16 +0.17 +0.15 +1.30 +0.20 +0.13 +0.20 +0.15 +0.20 +1.27 +0.18 MEAN VAL.GSCII DIFF.AREA - COL +0.00 +0.61 -0.00 +0.54 -0.00 +0.51 +0.00 +0.76 -0.00 +0.72 +0.00 +0.65 OF GSCII DIFF. AREA - COL. +0.44 +0.17 +0.24 +0.16 +1.04 +0.19 +0.39 +0.15 +0.19 +0.16 +1.03 +0.20
Comparison GSCI + GSCII and GSCII plates ( sDx case ) stars – stars
Comparison GSCI + GSCII and GSCII plates ( sDh case ) stars – stars
Comparison GSCI + GSCII and GSCII plates ( sDx case ) nostars – nostars
Comparison GSCII plates ( sDx case ) stars/stars and non stars/non stars
Comparison GSCII ( sDx )star/star and non-star/non-star case same color
Comparison GSCII ( sDx ) star/star case same area/diff. color and same color/diff. area
Comparison GSCII ( sDx ) non-star/non-star case same area/diff. color and same color/diff. area
Comparison GSCII ( sDx ) star/star and non-star/non-star same area/diff. color
Comparison GSCI + GSCII and GSCII plates ( sD magnitude) star–star
Comparison GSCI + GSCII and GSCII plates ( sD magnitude) non-star/non-star
Comparison GSCII plates ( sD magnitude) star/star and non-star/non-star
Comparison GSCII ( sD mag.) star/star case same color/diff. area and same area/diff. color
Comparison GSCII ( sD mag.) non-stars/non-stars case same color/diff. area and same area/diff. color
Comparison GSCII plates( sD mag ) star/star and non-star/non-star same color – diff. area
Comparison GSCII plates( sD mag ) star/star and non-star/non-star diff. color – same area
Comparison GSCII plates(Dx ) star/star and non-star/non-star
Comparison GSCII plates(Dx )star/star and non-star/non-star same color and different area
Comparison GSCII plates(Dx )star/star and non-star/non-star different color and same area
Comparison GSCII plates(Dx )star/star diff. color/same area and same color/diff. area
Comparison GSCII plates(Dx )non-star/non-star diff. color/same area and same color/diff. area
Comparison GSCII plates( D mag ) star/star and non-star/non-star
Comparison GSCII plates( D mag ) star/star same color/diff. area – diff. Color/same area
Comparison GSCII plates( D mag ) non-star/non-star same color/diff. area – diff. Color/same area
Summary Notes • THIS IS A FIRST SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF GSCII DATA QUALITY BASED ON A LIMITED NUMBER OF PLATES. THESE ARE DISTRIBUTED AROUND THE GALACTIC PLANEANDTHE GALACTIC POLES. • AS EXPECTED, THE ASTROMETRY IN BOTH COORDINATES IS BETTER FOR THE STAR/STAR CASES THAN FOR THE NON-STAR/NON-STAR ONES • THE ()IS ON AVERAGE BETTER THAN () IRRESPECTIVE OF CLASSIFICATION • THE ASTROMETRY IS GENERALLY BETTER FOR PLATE PAIRS HAVING SAME AREA AND DIFFERENT COLOR IRRESPECTIVE OF OBJECT CLASSIFICATION • THE PHOTOMETRY APPEARS VERY CONSISTENT IRRESPECTIVE OF CLASSIFICATION. ON PAIRS OF EQUAL-BANDPASS PLATES THE AVERAGE ERROR (IN THE DIFFERENCE) IS ~0.3 MAG
Summary Notes (continues) • AS EXPECTED, THE MEAN VALUES IN , AND (mag) ARE CENTERED AROUND THE NULL VALUE • MORE INTERESTING, THE DEVIATIONS OF , AND (mag) FROM THEIR MEAN VALUES SHOW THE EXPECTED BEHAVIORS FOR THE DIFFRENT CLASSES OF PLATE PAIRS (SAME AREA, DIFFERENT AREA, SAME BANDPASS, DIFF. BANDPASS, ETC.) • THIS GLOBAL QA DOES ALLOW THE DETECTION OF ANOMALOUS PLATES, AS IT WAS THE CASE FOR G039 (S020) • THIS TYPE OF ANALYSIS NEEDS TO BE RE-RUN ON A REPRESENTATIVE SET OF PLATES IN THE PRODUCTION DB AT ST ScI