1 / 21

Cyberbullying in Spain

Cyberbullying in Spain. Findings of the DAPHNE II Programme Project. Rosario Ortega Juan Calmaestra Joaquin Mora-Merchán With the col. of Paz Elipe Rosario Del Rey. METHOD: Sample. 1671 students (7 Secondary and High Schools) Age (M): 14.45 94.1% Owns a Mobile Phone

nicholas-zoie
Download Presentation

Cyberbullying in Spain

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Cyberbullying in Spain Findings of the DAPHNE II Programme Project Rosario Ortega Juan Calmaestra Joaquin Mora-Merchán With the col. of Paz Elipe Rosario Del Rey

  2. METHOD: Sample 1671 students (7 Secondary and High Schools) Age (M): 14.45 94.1% Owns a Mobile Phone 82.7% Has access to a Computer

  3. VICTIMS & AGGRESSORS • Cyberbullying

  4. VICTIMS Occa. Severe 7.5% 3.2% 3.5% 12.4% 0.5% 3.7% 6.2% 1.3%

  5. Age Direct Bullying

  6. Age Indirect Bullying

  7. AgeVía mobile phone * *

  8. Agevia the Internet

  9. Overlapping in victimization experiences

  10. Emotionalprofiles(onlyvictims) DIRECT BULLYING

  11. EmotionalProfilesof Indirect and Cybervictims Internet Indirect Bullying Mobile phone

  12. Conclusion and Discussion • The emotional profiles of cybervictimitation are similar to the indirect bullying. • The cyberbullying could be characterized as an indirect form of bullying (Slonje & Smith, 2008). • How can we interpreted the differences found between emotional profiles in direct bullying and in the other types of bullying? • Heterogeneity of behaviours included in direct bullying • The face-to-face characteristic could make the emotional information in the interactions episodes more “readable”.

  13. SUMMARY • Prevalence of cyberbullying in Spanish young people is still lower than the traditional bullying (nearly half of the traditional cybervictims). • Instant Messaging (Internet) and nasty call (mobile phone) are the most common form of cyber-harassment. • Gender -as traditional bullying- is important, but age does not follow the traditional trends (to peak on 15 year old using mobil phone and maintenance by using the Internet). • Lasting of cybervictimization is shorter than in traditional one. • A high numbers of cyberaggressors remain on anonimity (specially using the Internet) • An small group of students overlap, suffering all kind, traditional and cyber, victimisation.

  14. III Cyberbullying in adolescence: investigation and intervention in six European Countries Rosario Ortega Rosario Del Rey Juan Calmaestra Jose Antonio Casas Marta Villodre With collaboration: Joaquín Mora-Merchán Paz Elipe

  15. Contributions to Daphne III • Aims: • Investigation • Intervention • Dissemination

  16. Investigation • The Spanish team has already collected 1669 Daphne questionnaires from 7 secondary and high schools. Are more necessaries?

  17. Investigation • Having in mind the intervention we would like to administrate to the students: • Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) on Internet. Adaptation of the Davis (1980, 1983): IRI, validated to study empathy and pro-social behaviour linked • CAPIC: Questionnaire about self-steem, prosocial behaviour, internet compulsive use and cyberbullying. • Discussing group about positive uses of ICT and about how can be used to cope with cyberbullying.

  18. Intervention • Based on the pro-social use of Internet. • Aims: • to develop adolescent pro-social behaviour • to reduce adolescent anti-social behaviour • to reduce adolescent implication in cyberbullying

  19. Intervention • Beginning of October: pre-test in three secondary schools • From October until May: develop of the intervention • Students • Teachers • Parents • End of May: Pos-test

  20. Material • New materials • Protocol of cyberbullying designed with a multidisciplinary groups of professionals (EMICI): lawyer, journalist, computer Technician,

  21. Dissemination • Edition of material for students, teachers and parents • Participation in International Congress: • Final seminar • Articles

More Related