230 likes | 398 Views
Annotating Molecular Interactions in MINT. http://mint.bio.uniroma2.it/mint/Welcome.do. ANNOTATING PROTEIN INTERACTIONS: STANDARDS AND BASIC ASPECTS. What is archived in MINT?. MINT collects P-P interactions experimentally verified
E N D
Annotating Molecular Interactions in MINT http://mint.bio.uniroma2.it/mint/Welcome.do
ANNOTATING PROTEIN INTERACTIONS: STANDARDS AND BASIC ASPECTS
What is archived in MINT? • MINT collects P-P interactions experimentally verified • The interaction representation is according to PSI-MIs ontology and nomenclature • The interaction types collected in MINT are: • Colocalizations • Physical interactions • Direct interactions (enzymatic reactions)
Curation standards The PSI Molecular Interaction work group develops a common data standard that allows user to retrieve all relevant data from different sites and perform comparative analysis of different datasets
What is critical in the annotation process? • Organism identification • Proper Uniprot_ID detection • Experimental features annotations • Participant features annotations
Papers selection • Title • Abstract • Materials and methods • Quick look at the figures
THE SECOND BIOCREATIVE CHALLENGE: DATASETS PREPARATION
MINT curation projects • Journals curation (FEBS letters, EMBO Journal, EMBO Reports) • Thematic curation (Domains, VirHostome)
DELIVERED DATASETS • TRAINING SET • (128 pmids 1182 interactions) • TEST SET • (221 pmids 1489 interactions)
Biocreative training-set • The MINT/BioCreative positive test set is composed of papers extracted from volumes of FEBS letters, EMBO Journal and EMBO Reports published from january to july 2006 • All the papers not curated from the above mentioned volumes are considered belonging to the negative test set • For each interaction is reported the best interaction description sentence coming out from both the body text and the figure legends
ANNOTATION AND PREDICTION: USE CASES
Biocreative annotation flaws: examples • FALSE POSITIVES • Phosphorylation • FALSE NEGATIVES • Positive controls • MISINFORMATION • Complexes
Use cases • Pol I is a complex • No sentences are available for the illustrated colocalizations In situ colocalization of NM1 and Pol I Immunostaining of isolated nucleoli showed that actin and NM1 were enriched in nucleoli and their distribution correlated with upstream binding factor (UBF) and fibrillarin (Fig 1A). NMI colocalized with Pol I and green fluorescent protein–RPA53, a protein that decorates the active subpopulation of Pol I (Fig 1B). The colocalization between Pol I and NM1 was further corroborated by immunogold electron microscopy using intact HeLa cells (supplementary Fig 1 online). NM1 was distributed throughout the nucleoplasm but was largely excluded from the nucleoli, except the fibrillar centres. These nucleolar subcompartments are known to contain Pol I and Pol I-specific transcription factors (Scheer & Benavente, 1990; Dundr et al, 2002). In addition, both a novel autoimmune serum against Pol I (S57299; see supplementary Figs 2,3 online) and a peptide-specific affinitypurified antibody against NM1 blocked Pol I transcription in vitro (Fig 1C,D). These data support previous studies demonstrating a key role for NM1 in Pol I transcription (Fomproix & Percipalle, 2004; Philimonenko et al, 2004).
Use cases This experiment describes a genetic interaction
Use cases Post-translational modification or PPI?