330 likes | 505 Views
Climate Change: Sustaining Environmental and Social Resilience . Susan Baker Professor, Environmental Policy, Cardiff School of Social Sciences & Sustainable Places Research Institute, Cardiff University Transition Chepstow Festival Talk Forum Tuesday 10 July 2012
E N D
Climate Change: Sustaining Environmental and Social Resilience Susan Baker Professor, Environmental Policy, Cardiff School of Social Sciences & Sustainable Places Research Institute, Cardiff University Transition Chepstow Festival Talk Forum Tuesday 10 July 2012 Chepstow Methodist Church Hall
Current Situation • Environmentally perverse energy system • Increased urbanisation and land take • Population rise [global population 8.1 billion by 2042] • Problem of consumption • Culture of consumption in West • Rising consumption in industrialising states • By 2052, China's per capita consumption will be at least 2/3 that of US • Average economic growth of 14 emerging nations [including Brazil, India and South Africa] will treble over next 40 years
Consequences • Anthropogenic climate change & biodiversity loss [GEC] • Possibility of critical tipping points in earth system leading to rapid & irreversible change • Irreversible melt of Greenland ice sheet • Dieback of Amazon rainforest • Shift of West African monsoon
Climate Change Projections • Rising CO2 emissions will cause global average temperature rise of 20 C by 2052; 2.80 C by 2080 at a minimum • 20 C is rise we can adapt to and is ‘safe’ target of EU & member states • Scientists say that crossing 20 C threshold risks unstable climate in which weather extremes are common • Efforts so far to cut GHG are notsufficient to stop a rise beyond 20 C this century Sources: IPCChttp://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/spmsspm-projections-of.html; Club of Rome http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/08/club-of-rome-climate-change_n_1499183.html
Failure to Act • Governments and markets unlikely to do enough adaptation to and mitigation of climate change • UN EP: gap between countries' emissions cut pledges and what needed to remain under 20 C has widened • Emissions in 2020 likely to rise to between 6b. and 11b. tonnes over what is needed to limit global warming to safe levels
Safe Operating Space for Humanity The 9 Planetary Boundaries Safe biophysical boundaries outside which Earth System cannot function in stable state 9 Planetary Boundaries 3 boundaries [climate change, biological diversity and nitrogen input] already transgressed Boundaries are strongly connected – crossing one boundary may seriously threaten ability to stay within safe levels of others • Nature461, 472-475 (24 September 2009) Johan Rockström et al. climate change (CO2 concentration in atmosphere) ocean acidification (mean surface seawater saturation state) stratospheric ozone (% reduction in O3 concentration) biogeochemical nitrogen (N) cycle (industrial & agricultural fixation of N2); phosphorus (P) cycle (annual P inflow to oceans) global freshwater use (consumptive use of runoff resources) land system change (% of ice-free land surface under cropland) rate at which biological diversity is lost (annual rate extinctions) chemical pollution atmospheric aerosol loading
The New Politics of Limits • As planetary boundaries areput under stress so too are social bonds, relations & thresholds • Planetary boundaries concept can help society and policy makers adopt interconnected approach to climate change A new politics and economics of limits
Sustainable Future Past Future Growth Competitiveness Personal gain Planetary breaches Enhanced efficiency in resource use lost due to increased consumption [efficiency increases act as perverse incentives] Inclusive wealth Well-being Post-consumer, post-materialist society Personal happiness Ecological integrity Economic incentives for technological innovation Efficiency gains redirected to natural, social & human capital
Step 1: Replace Existing Approach • Replace traditional, trickle-down economic growth model & policy imperatives, including perverse incentives • Understand that approaching problems independently is inadequate: • e.g. incorporating technological change into existing global market system is not enough • or dealing with ‘low hanging fruits’ such as energy efficiency • More radical approach needed
Planetary Boundary Economy • Economic model maintains safe operating limits that do not breach planetary boundaries • Core aim of economic policies: maximise well-being in context of coupled social-ecological system • Core aim of human well-being policy: environmental & social sustainability
Key Elements of Well-Being • Health • Education • Physical security • Housing • Material wealth • Agency • Affiliation • Emotion • Ecological surety • Nusshaum, 2001;Doyal and Gough, 1991
Well-Being • Complex, multidimensional & context-specific • Includes physical well-being: ‘objective’[food, housing, clean water, education, personal security, ...] • Social and emotional attributes: ‘subjective’[self esteem, identity, equity, community, equality in social relations...]
Promoting Well-Being • Overcoming inequalities becomes key measure of progress • Devising new incentives for sustainability policy • Reducing absolute poverty & tacking inequalities • Addressing population increase • Allowing freer movement & better integration of people • Incorporating biodiversity & ecosystem services into policy, including land use planning • Urban planning takes on new urgency • Developing long-term vision for energy system • Ensuring technological transfer accompanied by social transformation policies • Promoting new intellectual & value paradigm
Measures of Well-Being Old Measure: GDP • Only measures monetary exchanges of good & services • An average measure that ignores asymmetrical distribution of wealth New Measure • Socialbenchmarksof well-being • ‘inclusive wealth’: new macroeconomic indicator of progress - measures productive base of country, while tracking changes in natural, social, human & produced capital • reflect well-being over spatial & temporal scales [e.g. present & future generations] • Ecologicalintegrity benchmarks • Integrated component reflecting interdependencies between social & environmental components
Step 2: Move towards Resilience • Ability of interdependent social and ecological system to cope with external stresses & disturbances arising from GEC • Defined as: • Amount of change thatsystem can undergo and still retain same control overfunction and structure • Degree to which system is capable of self-organization • Ability to build and increase capacity for learning & adaptation • Created through environmental and social sustainability
Environment & Social Sustainability • Environmental Sustainability: living within thelimits of natural world • Societal Sustainability: living in way that • provides everyone with capability to fulfil their material, social & emotional needs • maintaining social structures, cultural values & knowledge systems that underlie community Sustainability Policy: creating & maintaining conditions necessary for social wellbeing & ecological integrity
Adaptive Capacity • Ecological systems: genetic diversity, biological diversity, and heterogeneity of landscape mosaics • Social systems: existence of institutions and networks that learn and store knowledge and experience; create flexibility in problem solving; and balance power among interest groups Consequence of loss of resilience, and therefore of adaptive capacity: loss of opportunity & constrained options
Sustaining Adaptive Capacity Four critical requirements: • Learning to live with change and uncertainty • Nurturing diversity for resilience • Combining different types of knowledge for learning • Creating opportunity for self-organization towards social-ecological sustainability Folkeet al. (2002)
Societal Responsibility Promote ‘social innovation’ for adaptive capacity • SI: ‘significant, creative and sustainable shift’ in the way a given society deals with a ‘profound and previously intractable problem’ • Significant: • Scale: such as number of people affected • Scope: deep & multidimensional societal improvement • Resonance: capturing people’s imagination • Has impact on broader social, political & economic context that created problem in first place • Balance tilted towards social value –rather than private value
Examples of Social Innovation • Transition Towns movement • Fairtrademovement • Micro Finance and Credit movement
Higher Level Responsibility Contributions from state & international organisations • Interventions through specific regulations, strategies, policies, plans and funding mechanisms • Act to avoid localism bias that can operate at lower levels & which can cause problems at higher scale • Address spatial or temporal displacement of negative externalities associated with social innovation at local level • Through traditional distributive responsibilities, ensure more equitable distribution of benefit across space & time
How to Go Forward • Create new & strengthen existing links between civil society organisations and various public actors operating on different spatial scales • Traditional,top down, hierarchical governance can facilitate social innovation while guarding against coordination or distribution failures • Social actions can lead to emergence of governance practices that strengthen participatory practices