1 / 8

More 3 rd degree discrimination and elasticity calculation

More 3 rd degree discrimination and elasticity calculation. P. If we have a point on a demand curve like Q = 3 and P = 5, then we can calculate the elasticity with the following method as seen on the next few slides. 20. 8. Q. 5. 3.

nikkos
Download Presentation

More 3 rd degree discrimination and elasticity calculation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. More 3rd degree discrimination and elasticity calculation

  2. P If we have a point on a demand curve like Q = 3 and P = 5, then we can calculate the elasticity with the following method as seen on the next few slides. 20 8 Q 5 3

  3. Some folks who are really slick found out when you have a straight line demand curve you can calculate the elasticity at a point on the demand curve relatively easily. You need the P and Q values of the point for which you want to calculate the elasticity and you need the slope of the line. Let’s look at the slope on the next slide.

  4. P We talk about the slope of the line as the rise over the run. This is a fraction rise/run. One way to get the rise is to go from 0 to 20 and thus the rise is 20. Similarly, to get the run go from 0 to 5 to get 5. The slope is then 20/5. (The slope is really -20/5, but we ignore the minus sign) 20 rise 8 Q 5 3 run

  5. The definition of the elasticity of demand as the percent change in Qd divided by the percent change in P simplifies along a straight line demand curve at a point to P/Q times run/rise. You will note I have run/rise and the slope is the rise over the run. So we need the inverse of the slope. In our example we have P = 8, Q = 3, run = 5, and rise = 20, so Elasticity at the point P=8, Q = 3 is (8/3)(5/20) = 40/60 = 2/3

  6. Before we had a monopolist that had two markets to sell its product in. The demands in each market were P = 6 – Q and P = 8 – Q. If the monopolist acts as a single price monopolist it would add the two demands together and have 1 market demand. To get this demand we first switch each separate demand to the “Q” form, like so: Q = 6 – P and Q = 8 – P and so added together we get Q = 14 – 2P, or P = 7 - .5Q. Then MR = 7 – Q and with MR = MC (and the MC before was a constant at 4), we have 7 – Q = 4, or Q = 3 and the single price is 5.5

  7. Review Demands separately Demands together P = 6 – Q (MKT1) P = 7 - .5Q P = 8 – Q (MKT2) If single price monopoly P = 5.5 and Q = 3. Note at this price the separate quantity demanded amounts are 0.5 and 2.5 for a total of three. The revenue is 5.5(3) = 16.5 If the firm discriminates we (as we saw before) have in MKT 1 Q = 1 and P = 5 for revenue = 5, and in MKT2 Q= 2 and P = 6 for revenue = 12. Thus, on the 3 units sold the firm is better off selling in the separate markets at separate prices because revenue is 17 total. (Would this always be the case?)

  8. P P 8 6 5.5 5.5 Q Q 6 2.5 8 0.5 MKT1 MKT2 Here I show the two separate markets, but after we have treated them as 1 and found the market price of 5.5. The elasticity in MKT1 is (5.5/.5)(6/6) = 11 and the elasticity in MKT2 = (5.5/2.5)(8/8) = 2.2. The demand in both markets is elastic, but in MKT2 it is relatively more inelastic. Note when the firm acts as a 3rd degree price discriminator it raises the price in the relatively inelastic market and lowers the price in the relatively elastic market.

More Related