1 / 16

How Lawsuits Against Spammers Can Aid Spam-Filtering Technology: A Spam Litigator’s View From the Front Lines Jon Pra

How Lawsuits Against Spammers Can Aid Spam-Filtering Technology: A Spam Litigator’s View From the Front Lines Jon Praed Internet Law Group JonPraed@aol.com. What is Spam?. Spam is Unsolicited Bulk Commercial Email. Spam is Unsolicited Bulk Commercial Email.

nili
Download Presentation

How Lawsuits Against Spammers Can Aid Spam-Filtering Technology: A Spam Litigator’s View From the Front Lines Jon Pra

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. How Lawsuits Against Spammers Can Aid Spam-Filtering Technology: A Spam Litigator’s View From the Front Lines Jon Praed Internet Law Group JonPraed@aol.com

  2. What is Spam?

  3. Spam is Unsolicited Bulk Commercial Email

  4. Spam is Unsolicited Bulk Commercial Email • “bulk” – substantially similar emails • “commercial” – not inherently illegal • “email” – challenges for convergence • “unsolicited” – KEY – Intent of Recipient

  5. Recipient’s Intent Can Be Reflected in 3 Sources: • Text of Email – difficult to distinguish spam from opt-in advertisements; impossible to prevent spammer from reacting to filters* • Input from Recipient – difficult to obtain • Input from Sender – compelling when you can get it (spammers rarely have any evidence of recipient’s intent) * Effectiveness of filters should be measured by their resistance to evasion

  6. Laws Against Spam • AUPs – Setting expectations • Common Law – trespass to chattels • State Statutes (i.e., Virginia Computer Crimes Act; Washington anti-spam laws) • Federal Statutes (i.e., Computer Fraud & Abuse Act -- general computer crimes statute) • Pending Federal Legislation – silver bullets?

  7. Law’s Objectives • Injunctions • Damages • Bankruptcy • Imprisonment • General & Specific Deterrence • Retribution • Education

  8. Profile of a Spammer • Hackers Gone Bad or Crooks Turned Geek • Never Been So Successful In Any Other Job • Big Spenders • But Increasingly Professional

  9. How Spammers Mail • Spam Houses – increasingly offshore • Dial up accounts – compromised, free or anonymously registered • Bulk Email Software* • IP spoofing? * Look for more legal attention and research on bulk email software

  10. What Spammers Advertise • Point of Sale via Online Payment • Lead Generation • Rarely Advertise Non-Internet Sites (phone numbers, PO boxes) • Almost Never Advertise Brand Awareness

  11. Where Spammers Advertise • HyperText Links – temporary sites linked to permanent sites (www.freewebspace.com/mypage.htm linking to www.dirtygirls.com) • Encrypted webpages/ Obfuscated URLs • Redirecting webpages • Temporary Connectivity is the Norm

  12. Spam = Fraud • Source and links are transient and falsified • Domain name registrations – is every adult website offshore? (False info can lead to ICANN action (9/02 Verisign)) • Webhosting – Spam Houses $10,000/month • Third Party Advertisers – In Search of Plausible Deniability

  13. War Stories • Contempt is Real -- AOL v. CN Productions • Breaking the Webmaster Model -- AOL v. Cyber Entertainment Network • You Can Sue Where the Spam Lands and Notice Will Be Presumed -- Verizon Online v. Ralsky • Other cases: AOL v. Forrest Dayton, AOL v. Joseph Melle

  14. Federal Legislation • Shift Legal Burden to Sender to Produce Evidence of Intent – Presumption of Spam • Sunshine via “custodian of records” disclosures (with Criminal Enforcement for False Disclosures) (18 USC 2257) • Sliding Statutory Damages (based on presence of disclosure, evidence of intent and other forms of fraud) • Government & ISP Enforcement

  15. Limits of the Law • Dependence on technical information • Slow and Costly • Growing International Scope

  16. How Lawsuits Against Spammers Can Aid Spam-Filtering Technology: A Spam Litigator’s View From the Front Lines Jon Praed Internet Law Group JonPraed@aol.com

More Related