1 / 30

Charm production cross section and charm physics at the Tevatron

Charm production cross section and charm physics at the Tevatron. Sandro De Cecco INFN Roma 1 “Rencontres de physique du Vietnam”, Hanoi 07 aout 2004. Outline. The Tevatron collider CDF detector and triggers. Highlights on hadronic heavy flavours production.

Download Presentation

Charm production cross section and charm physics at the Tevatron

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Charm production cross section and charm physics at the Tevatron Sandro De Cecco INFN Roma 1 “Rencontres de physique du Vietnam”, Hanoi 07 aout 2004 Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  2. Outline • The Tevatron collider • CDF detector and triggers. • Highlights on hadronic heavy flavours production. • Measurement of prompt charm production cross section. • Search for direct ACP in D0Cabibbo suppressed decays. • Search for FCNC decay D0mm. • Conclusions and perspectives ! Disclaimer:results come from CDF only; D0 is going to publish charm physics results soon Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  3. The Tevatron pp collider Superconducting proton-synchrotron: 36p36p bunches, crossing each 396 ns at √s = 1.96 TeV Luminosity……………………………..: record peak L=1  1032 cm-2s-1 (as of July 04) # interactions / bunch-crossing……...: < N >= 1.5 (@ 5 x 1031cm-2s-1) Luminous region size………………...: 30 cm (beam axis) x 30 mm (transverse) Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  4. Tevatron plans • RECYCLER had a first successful test • Plans beyond FY 05 depends on Recycler ring and electron cooling performances • Will see after aug./nov.04 shutdown Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  5. Tevatron FY04 performance L (pb -1) FY04Design FY04 Base 1st May 2004 2003 1st Jan. 2004 2002 • Tevatron is working very well this year (Design plan): • Initial luminosity (may 04) = 7.2 X 1031sec-1 cm-2 (now 1.x1032) • Weekly Integrated luminosity ~ 10 pb-1/w • ~350 pb-1 on tape, 100-200 pb-1 used for analysis so far Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  6. The upgraded detectors • New silicon detector • new drift chamber • Upgraded calorimeter, m • Upgraded DAQ/trigger, • displaced-track trigger • New TOF PID system • New tracking: silicon and • fibers in magnetic field • Upgraded muon system • Upgraded DAQ/trigger • (displaced track soon) Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  7. b b g g b g q b b b b b q g g g q q Flavor Excitation Flavor Creation (gluon fusion) Flavor Creation (annihilation) Gluon Splitting HF Physics at pp collider bb/cc production mechanics in hadron collider: LO NLO • Huge cross-section: 50-100 b • All B/D species produced: • Bu,Bd,Bs,Bc,B*,b, b… • D0,D,D*,Ds,D**,c, c… • BUT:(bb,cc) << (pp) (~65 mb)  HF events have to be selected with specific triggers • Trigger requirements:large bandwidth, background suppression, small dead-time Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  8. Study bb correlation B production x-section, Run I B cross section measured from Run I at Tevatron is consistently higher than NLO QCD Theoretical development still ongoing. Ex: fragmentation effect ……. Experimental Approaches: More cross section measurement -- energy at 1.96TeV -- lower pT(B)  Measure CHARM production cross section Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  9. ~ 1 mm b,c decays primary vertex secondary vertex Impact Parameter ( ~100mm) Heavy Flavours triggers at CDF II With the NewSilicon Vertex Trigger Conventional at colliders (Run I) Di-Muon (J/) Pt() > 1.5 GeV J/ modes down to low Pt(J/)~0 (Run II) Rare decays Displaced track + lepton (e, ) I.P.(trk) > 120m Pt(lepton) > 4 GeV Semileptonic modes 2-Displaced tracks PT(trk) > 2 GeV pT> 5.5 GeV I.P.(trk) > 120(100) m fully hadronic modes + Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  10. COT track ( 2 parameters) 5 SVX coordinates beam spot d Impact Parameter (transverse projection) SiliconVertexTracker: thehadronic B trigger • Online Impact parameter • Available at Level 2 trigger (20µs latency) • Trigger decision • convolution of transverse size of the beam spot with the impact parameter resolution of the SVT: s≈47 um ≈ 35 um + 30 um SVT resolution Beam spot size ( Compare to offline ~ 46 mm ) Impact parameter distribution Collect large amount of fully reconstructed B,D hadrons: Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  11. Prompt Charm Meson X-Section With early CDF data: 5.80.3pb-1 • Measure prompt charm meson • production cross section • Data collected by SVT trigger • from 2/2002-3/2002 • Measurement not statistics limited • Large and clean signals: Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  12. Separating prompt from secondary Charm Separate prompt and secondary charm based on theirtransverse impact parameter distribution. Prompt D Secondary D from B • Need to separate direct D and BD decay • Prompt D point back to collision point • I.P.= 0 • Secondary D does not point back to PV • I.P. 0 Prompt peak Detector I.P. resolution shape measured from data in K0s sample. BD tail Direct Charm Meson Fractions: D0: fD=86.4±0.4±3.5% D*+: fD=88.1±1.1±3.9% D+: fD=89.1±0.4±2.8% D+s: fD=77.3±3.8±2.1% Most of reconstructed charm mesons are direct  Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  13. Prompt Charm Meson X-Sections Determine trigger and reconstruction efficiency from data and MC Measure charm meson pT spectrum Integrated cross sections: As a comparison the beauty meson x-sec (CDF Run I): CDF prompt charm cross section result published in PRLhep-ex/0307080 Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  14. Differential Charm Meson X-Section PT dependent x-sections: Theory prediction: CTEQ6M PDF Mc=1.5GeV, Fragmentation: ALEPH measurement Renorm. and fact. Scale: mT=(mc2+pT2)1/2 Theory uncertainty: scale factor 0.5-2.0 Calculation from M. Cacciari and P. Nason: Resummed perturbative QCD (FONLL) JHEP 0309,006 (2003) Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  15. Comparison with Theory Ratio of measured to predicted cross sections: PRL89:122003,2002 • NLO calculations compatible within errors • pTshape is consistent for D mesons • Measured cross section is • ~1.5 factor higher: similar to B Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  16. D0→h+h- direct CP Asymmetries and Decay Rate ratios • The huge amount data collected by the Two Track Trigger have been used for this analysis • Relative branching ratios: • G(D0→K+K-) / G(D0→Kp) • G(D0→p+p-) / G(D0→Kp) • G(D0→KK) / G(D0→pp)~2.8 (SM) • Direct CP asymmetries where • f is CP eigenstate (ex. K+K-,p+p-): • Candidates selected as: D*+/-→D0p (unbiased tag of the D0 flavor) Normalization mode D0→Kp ~180000 D*+/-→ D0p!!! Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  17. D0 Cabibbo suppressed 2 body decays D0 pp KK D0 Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  18. CP Asymmetries and Decay Rate ratios Very important to understand the asymmetry of the CDF detector at per mille level !!! • Results are computed after correction for: • intrinsic charge asymmetry • relative acceptance between the D0 modes Submitted to PRL august 04 Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  19. Search for FCNC D0→mm • SM expectation BR~ 3∙10-13 • Best limit: <4.1∙10-6 (90% CL) (Beatrice/WA92, E771) • BR significantly enhanced with New Physics (e.g. R-Parity Violation Susy: ~3.5*10-6) • Experimental strategy: • Events from two-track trigger using first 69pb-1 of data • To cancel acceptance effects normalize toD0→pp • Only relative efficiency needed Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  20. FCNCD0→mm: Results Combinatorial:1.5+-0.7 events Fakes: 0.22+-0.02 events 1.7 expected events 0 events observed Mmm with D* tag and 2 muons BR(D0→mm)<2.4x10-6 (@90% CL) Factor 2 improvement over best limit Next:use full muon coverage and 2-3 times more data (~1year)  also look atD+→pmm, D+→Kmm, D0→me, Ds Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  21. Conclusions • Prompt charm cross-section has been measured for the first time at collider  useful input to QCD calculations for HF production and hadronization models. • Hadronic D0 decays relative BR’s measured with high accuracy • Search for direct CP asymmetries in Cabibbo suppressed D0 decays is world best single measurement. • CDF will soon be sensitive to beyond SM theories with rare D decays • Charm yields are competitive to B-factories and physics program complementary to CLEO-C. The charming side of the Tevatron… Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  22. BACKUP slides Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  23. CDF II tracking system TOF:100ps resolution, 2 sigma K/ separation for tracks below 1.6 GeV/c (significant improvement of Bs flavor tag effectiveness) - charge) TIME OF FLIGHT CDF Roma COT: large radius (1.4 m) Drift chamber • 96 layers, ~100ns drift time • Precise PT above 400 MeV/c • Precise 3D tracking in ||<1 (1/PT) ~ 0.1%GeV –1; (hit)~150m • dE/dx info provides >1 sigma K/ separation above 2 GeV • SVX-II + ISL: 6 (7) layers of double-side silicon (3cm < R < 30cm) • Standalone 3D tracking up to ||= 2 • Very good I.P. resolution: ~30m (~20 m with Layer00) LAYER 00:1 layer of radiation-hard silicon at very small radius (1.5 cm) (achievable: 45 fs proper time resolution in Bs  Dsp ) Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  24. CDF II particle ID handles # s TOF PID • Specific Ionization of charged particles (dE/dx) measurement in the COT gas chamber. • Time of flight measurement with the new scintillator bars detector (TOF) at R=1.4m with a sTOF = 100 ps dE/dx PID p Total K/p separation power of at least 2sfor momentum up to 1.6 GeV/c with TOF And at least 1sfor momentum up to 4-5 GeV/c with TOF + dE/dx Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  25. Crossing: 396 ns: 2.5 MHz Level 1: hardware Calorimeter, Muon, Track 15kHz (reduction ~x200) Level 2: hardware + CPU Cal cluster, Silicon track 300 Hz (reduction ~x5) Level 3: Linux PC farm ~ Offline quantities 50 Hz (reduction ~ x6) CDF Trigger System Overview Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  26. CDF data tacking performance Data-Taking Efficiency Integrated Luminosity Detector efficiency ~85-90% Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  27. Charge Asymmetry in the CDF Detector Study asymmetry using unbiased tracks and correct • Residual asymmetry syst.error (same track quality cuts generic track sample) (Expect no CP asymmetry) Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  28. Normalization Mode: D0→pp Search window: 1.84<m<1.884 GeV Selection: intersect D0 with soft p 0.144<m(D*)-m(D0)<0.147 Optimized cuts: Lxy<0.45 cm, |dxy|<0.015cm, Angle cut between track and muon stub, Track quality cuts N(pp) = 1371+-53 Kp Relative efficiency from Monte Carlo: ( muon reconstruction and p decay in flight efficiency) Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  29. D0→mmBackground Estimate combinatorics from high mass sideband where both tracks are muons Fakes from p misidentification: N(D0→pp) in mass window times (misid probability)2: p misid probability From D* tagged D0→Kp Combinatorics:1.5+-0.7 events Fakes: 0.22+-0.02 events Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

  30. X(3872) physics: the B fraction Sandro De Cecco - INFN Roma 1

More Related