330 likes | 559 Views
Renewable Energy Study Worcestershire. Duncan Brewer Senior Engineer. Aim and scope of Study. Establish the realistic potential of large scale renewable generation in the County. Large Scale Renewables; Hydro: >50 kWe Wind: > 250 kWe Biomass: >500 kWe or >45 kWt. Methodology. Scenarios.
E N D
Renewable Energy StudyWorcestershire Duncan Brewer Senior Engineer
Aim and scope of Study • Establish the realistic potential of large scale renewable generation in the County. • Large Scale Renewables; • Hydro: >50 kWe • Wind: > 250 kWe • Biomass: >500 kWe or >45 kWt
Scenarios Scenario 1 Conservative approach, no substantial barriers and no policy change. Scenario 2 Pragmatic approach, assumes more favourable planning and economic circumstances. Scenario 3 Most optimistic scenario, no barriers to site development, all resource will be utilised. Unlikely to be achieved.
Use Electricity Heat Combined Heat and Power (Transport) Conversion technologies: Direct Combustion Gasification Anaerobic Digestion Pyrolysis
Methodology • Determine available resource • Assumptions on how much of resource available for biomass energy • Potential energy calculated using calorific value of each biomass resource • Energy output dependant on usage – electricity, heat, CHP
Typical Domestic Energy Usage Total Energy consumption ~ 23,300 kWh per home per year.
13,445 hectares of woodland consisting of 707 woods Dry annual mass available for energy: 1559t Calorific value:19GJ/t Woodland and Forestry Energy output: Electricity: 750 homes Heat: 355 homes CHP: 304 homes
Arable and set-aside land suitable Short Rotation Coppice calorific value 19 GJ/t Miscanthus calorific value 17GJ/t Potential for energy = 29016t Energy Crops Energy output: Electricity: 13420 homes Heat: 6361 homes CHP: 5450 homes
Straw • Used as bedding, feed for livestock, ploughed into soil as fertiliser and for energy. • Estimated surplus in Worcestershire • Potential for energy = 58095t • Calorific value 14 GJ/t Energy output: Electricity: 20555 homes Heat: 9743 homes CHP: 8347 homes
735 cattle holdings, 142 pig holdings, 485 poultry holdings Potential for energy production = 140846t Anaerobic Digestion Animal Manure & Poultry Litter Energy output: Electricity: 3063 homes Heat: 1089 homes CHP: 878 homes
Resource Utilisation • Unlike hydro and wind technologies, biomass site of less importance - therefore number of areas appropriate for biomass development identified rather then specific sites • Site Specifications; • Brownfield site where possible • Close to fuel source • Space - typically a 1.5 MW plant requires 0.5 hectares of land • Access for fuel deliveries and good transport links – typically a 2.5MW plant requires 25 deliveries/wk (38t lorry) • Access to water for cooling for large biomass plants (>20MW) • Grid connection • District heating connection (if CHP plant)
Wind resources • NOABL Wind Speed database at 45m above ground level • Sites with wind speeds >6m/s considered. • Ideally sites with wind speeds > 7m/s most favorable
Wind - Constraints • (Wind resource) • Local topography • Land Designations: AONB, SSSI’s, SAC’s • Common land, green belt • Scheduled ancient monuments • Topple distance to major arteries • Air traffic and electromagnetic interference • Communication and microwave links • 50m buffer zone to footpaths, 350m buffer zone to dwellings • Access
Wind – Potential Resource • 27 potential sites identified and prioritised • Considered small 250kW, medium 1.5MW and large 2.5MW wind turbines due to access considerations
Hydro • Low head (1-3m drop) • Flow (greater than 0.5 m3/s) • Worcester suites run of river type installations • Existing structures • Weirs • Locks • Access • Flood risk • Land availability • Grid connection • Environment • Listed structures
Hydro • 7 potential sites • 3 River Avon • 4 River Severn • 1 River Teme • Hydro has the least resource of the 3 resources examined in the study • Total hydro potential 3.4 MW (wind ~83MW)
Total estimated renewable energy generation per scenario for all 3 renewable resources
In context • Worcestershire Climate Change Strategy • 155 GWh attainable given resource • Unlike by 2011 given developments in excess of 2 years • National target of 15% renewables • Worcestershire County is unable to attain this target with the renewable resource available within the County.
Moving forward • Develop attainable staged renewable targets • Supported policies within • Local development framework • Community strategies • Economic development plans • Environmental strategies • Forestry frameworks • Training and promotional activities (understanding issues) • Development of local expertise • Development of exemplar projects (County Council Land) • Collaboration between authorities • Consistency in long term policy
Summary • Worcester has a renewable energy resource Most resource Wind Biomass Least resource Hydro • Realistic County renewable energy target • 3.5% total energy by 2026 • Suggest staged targets
Thank you Duncan Brewer - duncan.brewer@itpower.co.uk