E N D
1. Ovarian Cancer: Diagnosis and Screening in Primary Care
Elise M. Hughes-Watkins, M.D.
November 30, 2001
2. Ovarian Cancer: Burden of suffering 4th leading cause of cancer death in women in the U.S. (after lung, breast and colon)
Overall 5-year survival rate is 35%
The “silent killer”: asymptomatic in early stages
75% diagnosed with advanced stage disease; 5-year survival only 10-28%
Woman’s lifetime risk of dying from ovarian cancer is 1.1%
3. Cancer Incidence and Deaths in U.S.Women in 2000 Adapted from Paley,P, Screening for the major malignancies affecting women: Current guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:
4. Types of Ovarian Tumors Functional
Follicle cyst
Corpus luteum cyst
Theca lutein cyst
Inflammatory
Tubo-ovarian abscess
Benign tumors/cysts*
Endometriotic cyst
Brenner tumor
Benign teratoma (dermoid cyst)
Fibroma
*Rare or very rare potential for malignancy Malignant (or malignant potential)
Malignant teratoma
Endometrioid carcinoma
Dygerminoma
Secondary ovarian tumor
Cystadenoma, cystadenocarcinoma (>50% for serous, ~5% for mucinous)
Granulosa cell tumor (15-20%)
Arrhenoblastoma (<20%)
Theca cell tumor (<1%)
5. Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Overall 5-year survival rate is 75-95% if cancer confined to ovaries; decreases to 10-17% if distant metastases
Survival improved when cancer detected in early stage
Only 25% diagnosed in Stage I
6. Early Detection and Mortality No direct evidence that women with early stage cancer found on screening have lower mortality than women with more advanced disease
Indirect evidence supports benefits of early detection:
Most important prognostic factor in patients with advanced ovarian cancer is tumor burden after initial debulking
Surgical debulking and chemo more effective when cancer detected early
7. The challenge Natural history of ovarian cancer not well understood
No well-defined precursor lesion
Length of time from localized tumor to dissemination is unknown
Multiple efforts underway to develop effective screening method for early detection
8. Risk factors The majority of women with ovarian cancer have no known risk factors
Most significant risk factor is genetic predisposition
9. Risk factors: Heredity Up to 10% of epithelial ovarian cancer cases are familial
3 familial syndromes: familial breast-ovarian cancer syndrome, site-specific ovarian cancer, and cancer family syndrome (Lynch type II)
Familial breast-ovarian cancer and site-specific ovarian cancer syndromes both associated with mutations of the BRCA1 suppressor gene; account for 90% of familial ovarian cancers
Rollins,G. Ann Int Med 2000;133:1021-1024
10. Additional Risk Factors Age
Women over age 50 account for ~80% of all cases (ave. age at dx is 61)
Reproductive history
early menarche, nulliparity or age >30 at first child-bearing, and late menopause
Fertility drugs
prolonged use of Clomid, especially without achieving pregnancy
Personal history of breast cancer
Hormone replacement therapy > 10 years
May be associated with 30% increased risk
Talcum powder
Some studies have shown slightly increased risk in women who use talc powder on genital area
American Cancer Society, 2001 Half of all ovarian cancers are diagnosed in women > 65yoHalf of all ovarian cancers are diagnosed in women > 65yo
11. Protective factors Multiparity: First pregnancy before age 30
Oral contraceptives: 5 years of use cuts risk nearly in half
Tubal ligation
Hysterectomy
Lactation
Bilateral oopherectomy
12. Delays in Diagnosis Lack of severity and specificity of early symptoms
Early signs/symptoms may include bloating, gas, indigestion, abdominal fullness or discomfort, constipation, pelvic pressure, urinary frequency, abnormal vaginal bleeding, fatigue, back pain, leg pain
Early stage tumors difficult to detect on pelvic exam
13. Diagnostic tools History
Pelvic Exam (including rectal)
Transvaginal Ultrasound – detection of masses and mass characteristics
Tumor markers – CA-125, LPA (plasma lysophosphatidic acid)
CT – assess spread to LN, pelvic and abdominal structures
MRI – best for distinguishing malignant from benign tumors
14. Work-up of Adnexal Mass Age
Size of mass
Unilateral vs. bilateral
CA-125 levels Ultrasound configuration
Color-flow Doppler flow
Presence of symptoms Must first categorize as functional, benign neoplastic or potentially malignant
Diagnostic approach depends on:
15. Diagnostic approach If premenopausal and asymptomatic, with unilateral, mobile, simple cystic mass <8-10cm and no family history, can observe for 4-6 weeks and then repeat TVUS and pelvic exam.
If resolved, no further work-up necessary
If larger or unchanged, or if character of mass has changed on TVUS, surgical evaluation required
16. Diagnostic Approach If postmenopausal and asymptomatic, with unilateral simple cyst <5cm AND normal CA-125, can follow closely with repeat TVUS
All other postmenopausal women with ovarian mass require surgical evaluation
17. Surgical Evaluation Refer to Gyn-Onc specialist
Exploratory laparotomy has been the gold standard and includes:
Peritoneal washings for cytology
Evaluation of frozen section
Complete staging procedure if borderline or malignant tumor on frozen section
18. Surgical Evaluation Laparoscopy can be considered in premenopausal woman with ovarian mass small enough to remove via laparoscopic approach; not recommended if high suspicion for malignancy
19. Stages Ia, Ib, Ic Stage I: confined to ovary or ovaries
IA: unilateral, capsule intact, no tumor on ext surface. No ascites.
IB: bilateral, same as above
IC: 1 or both ovaries with ruptured capsule, surface tumor, + ascites or + peritoneal washingStage I: confined to ovary or ovaries
IA: unilateral, capsule intact, no tumor on ext surface. No ascites.
IB: bilateral, same as above
IC: 1 or both ovaries with ruptured capsule, surface tumor, + ascites or + peritoneal washing
20. Stages IIa, IIb, IIc Stage II: Pelvic extension
IIA: involvement of uterus or fallopian tubes, (-) peritoneal washings
IIB: involvement of other pelvic tissues (bladder, sigmoid colon, rectum), (-) peritoneal washings
IIC: IIA or IIB with ruptured capsule, surface tumor, + peritoneal washings or ascitesStage II: Pelvic extension
IIA: involvement of uterus or fallopian tubes, (-) peritoneal washings
IIB: involvement of other pelvic tissues (bladder, sigmoid colon, rectum), (-) peritoneal washings
IIC: IIA or IIB with ruptured capsule, surface tumor, + peritoneal washings or ascites
21. Stages IIIa, IIIb, IIIc Stage III: Peritoneal implants outside pelvis or + retroperitoneal or inguinal LN
IIIA: grossly limited to true pelvis with microscopic seeding of abdom peritoneum
IIIB: Implants on abdom peritoneum < or = 2cm diam
IIIC: Implants on abdom peritoneum > 2cm or + retroperitoneal or inguinal LNStage III: Peritoneal implants outside pelvis or + retroperitoneal or inguinal LN
IIIA: grossly limited to true pelvis with microscopic seeding of abdom peritoneum
IIIB: Implants on abdom peritoneum < or = 2cm diam
IIIC: Implants on abdom peritoneum > 2cm or + retroperitoneal or inguinal LN
22. Stage IV Stage IV: distant mets (liver, lungs), + pleural fluidStage IV: distant mets (liver, lungs), + pleural fluid
23. Treatment Depends on staging, tumor type, age, desire for future fertility
Can include surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy
Clinical trials are ongoing
24. Surgical treatment Primary debulking and cytoreduction; may include:
Bilateral salpingo-oopherectomy
Hysterectomy
Lymphadenectomy (para-aortic, inguinal)
Omentectomy
“brushing” of diaphragm, examination of liver
25. Chemotherapy and Radiation Usually 6 cycles of chemotherapy
Cisplatin (or Carboplatin) plus Paclitaxel most commonly used combination therapy
XRT
26. Screening Strategies Ultrasound (transvaginal vs transabdominal)
Color-flow doppler
CA-125
Other tumor markers
27. Ultrasound Both tranabdominal and transvaginal techniques identify enlarged ovaries or abnormal morphology; TVUS has better resolution
One large study of TVUS underway has reported sensivity of 81% and specificity of 98.9%
Major limitations are poor PPV in asymptomatic women and inability to detect malignances when ovaries are normal size
Allows earlier stage detection
28. Color-flow Doppler Used in conjunction with TVUS
Measures resistance in blood vessels supplying the ovaries
May provide additional information to help distinguish malignant from benign masses
29. CA-125 Sustained elevation in 82% of women with advanced ovarian cancer, but fewer than 1% of healthy women
Poor sensitivity (elevated in only 50% of women with Stage I disease)
Poor specificity (elevated in many gynecologic and non-gynecologic malignancies as well as benign conditions) CA-125 elevated in:
Malignant conditions
Ovarian CA of various types
Cervical CA
Fallopian tube CA
Endometrial CA
Pancreatic CA
Colon CA
Breast CA
Lymphoma
Mesothelioma
Benign conditions:
Endometriosis
Uterine fibroids
PID
Pregnancy
Diverticulitis
Pancreatitis
Liver disease
Renal failure
Menstruation
Appendicitis
Inflammatory bowel disease
CA-125 elevated in:
Malignant conditions
Ovarian CA of various types
Cervical CA
Fallopian tube CA
Endometrial CA
Pancreatic CA
Colon CA
Breast CA
Lymphoma
Mesothelioma
Benign conditions:
Endometriosis
Uterine fibroids
PID
Pregnancy
Diverticulitis
Pancreatitis
Liver disease
Renal failure
Menstruation
Appendicitis
Inflammatory bowel disease
30. CA-125 Malignant conditions
Cervical CA
Fallopian tube CA
Endometrial CA
Pancreatic CA
Colon CA
Breast CA
Lymphoma
Mesothelioma
Benign conditions
Endometriosis/Menses
Uterine fibroids
PID
Pregnancy
Diverticulitis
Pancreatitis
Liver disease
Renal failure
Appendicitis
IBD
31. Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) Tumor marker being investigated for screening
Phospholipid with mitogenic and growth factor-like actions
In 1 small study LPA was detected in 9 of 10 patients with Stage I ovarian CA, 24/24 with advanced cancer, and 14/14 with recurrent cancer. Only 28 of 47 pts had elevated CA-125, including 2 of 9 with Stage I disease
32. Current Screening Guidelines “Routine screening for ovarian cancer by ultrasound, the measurement of serum tumor markers, or pelvic examination is not recommended. There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against the screening of asymptomatic women at increased risk of developing ovarian cancer.” U.S.Preventive Services Taskforce, Guidelines from Guide to Clinical Preventive Services, 2nd edition, 1996
33. Screening Guidelines– cont’d NIH Consensus Conference (1994)
women with presumed hereditary cancer syndrome should undergo annual pelvic exams, CA-125 measurements, and TVUS until childbearing is complete or at age 35, at which time prophylactic bilateral oopherectomy is recommended.
ACP
counsel high risk women about potential harms and benefits of screening
34. Screening, cont’d American Cancer Society, AAFP and ACOG do not recommend screening for ovarian cancer in the general population
Canadian Task Force on Periodic Health Examination
“insufficient evidence to recommend for or against screening in high-risk women”
35. Where do we go from here? Several strategies for screening currently under investigation
TVUS as primary screening method
Multimodal strategy using CA-125 as initial indicator and if elevated, TVUS used for secondary testing
LPA (phospholipid with mitogenic and GF-like actions) may be more sensitive than CA-125 in detecting early stage cancers
36. Ovarian Cancer Screening Trials The United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening: will compare TVUS and multimodal screening to control
The European Study: RCT to screen women with TVUS at 18-month or 3-year intervals
The NIH Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial: 10-year study using multimodal strategy
37. Take home points Screening not indicated at this time
ASK about family history of cancers
LISTEN when women present with non-specific GI complaints; include OC in DDx
DO perform careful bimanual exam and rectal exam as part of pelvic exam
Refer women with + Family Hx to GynOnc
38. References American Cancer Society. Guidelines for the cancer-related checkup: and update. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 1993.
Daly M, Obrams GI. Epidemiology and risk assessment for ovarian cancer. Semin Oncol 1998;25(3):255-264
DePriest PD, Gallion HH, van Nagell JR Jr et al. Transvaginal sonography as a screening method for the detection of early ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1997;65(3):408-414
Hensley ML, Castiel M, Robson ME. Screening for ovarian cancer: what we know, what we need to know. Oncology (Huntingt) 2000;14(11):1601-1607
Holschneider CH, Berek JS. Ovarian cancer: epidemiology, biology, and prognostic factors. Semin Surg Oncol 2000;19(1):3-10
6. Jacobs IJ, Skates SJ, et al. Screening for ovarian cancer: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1999;353(9160):1207-1210
39. References, cont’d 7. Kurtz AB, Tsimikas JV, et al. Diagnosis and Staging of Ovarian Cancer: Comparative Values of Doppler and Conventional US, CT and MR Imaging Correlated with Surgery and Histopathologic Analysis-Report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology 1999;212(1):19-27
NIH Consensus Development Conference Statement. Ovarian cancer: screening, treatment, and follow-up. Gynecol Oncol 1994;55(3 Pt2):S4-14.
Paley P. Screening for the major malignancies affecting women: Current guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:1021-1030.
10. Rollins G. Developments in Cervical and Ovarian Cancer Screening: Implications for Current Practice. Ann Int Med 2000;133: 1021-1024
40. References, cont’d 11. Ryan: Kistner’s Gynecology & Women’s Health, 7th ed. Mosby, Inc., 1999.
12. Tierney LM, McPhee SJ, Papadakis MA, editors. Current Medical Diagnosis and Treatment, 39th edition. Lange Medical Books/ McGraw-Hill, 2000.
13. Tingulstad S, Hagen B, et al. Evaluation of a risk of malignancy index based on serum CA125, ultrasound findings and menopausal status in the pre-operative diagnosis of pelvic masses. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103(8):826-831
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, Guidelines from Guide to Clinical Preventive Services, (Second Edition) 1996.
15. Zanotti K, Kennedy A. Screening for Gynecologic Cancer. Med Clin N Am 1999;83: