110 likes | 134 Views
Increasing the intensity at 450 GeV: RF issues. A. Butterworth AB/RF. Possible RF issues. RF High Power RF system total beam intensity Low Level RF system & beam control what feedback loops do we need? half-detuning coupled-bunch instability threshold RF Synchronization system
E N D
Increasing the intensity at 450 GeV: RF issues A. Butterworth AB/RF
Possible RF issues • RF High Power RF system • total beam intensity • Low Level RF system & beam control • what feedback loops do we need? • half-detuning • coupled-bunch instability threshold • RF Synchronization system • multi-batch injection in 2 rings
RF High Power system • Amplification chain, klystrons, waveguides, circulators, loads, etc. • Machine protection: Beam instability due to loss of control of a cavity becomes an issue at total intensity above ~1/2 nominal (~250mA) • would normally generate a beam dump interlock • RF equipment protection becomes an issue at total intensity above ~0.5mA total beam current • beam interlocks foreseen to protect cavities and loads from power coupled out of beam • with 43 bunches of 4x1010 we are at about 0.6% of nominal, or 3mA • i.e. still far away from any beam stability problems • however we may already need to connect beam interlocks for RF equipment protection
Cavity control feedback loops • Tuner Loop: Adjusts resonant frequency of the cavity to minimize klystron current. Commissioned and available from Day 1. • “Half detuning” technique used to minimize klystron power transients – requires knowledge of incoming beam intensity before first injection (timing/telegram) • RF Feedback Loop: Reduces the cavity impedance at the fundamental (by factor of 20 for Q=20000, by 180 at Q = 180000). Transient beam loading + longitudinal stability. Commissioned and available from Day 1. • 1-Turn Delay Feedback: Adds another factor 10 reduction on the revolution frequency side-bands. (Transient beam loading + longitudinal stability). Will not be commissioned on Day 1.
Half detuning • Abort gap ~ 3 ms • Half detuning principle: • If cavity tuned for beam current Ib, Ig minimal when beam present, but large power surge during abort gap • If cavity tuned for zero beam current, Ig minimal during abort gap, but large power surge during beam segment • Half detuning = detuned for Ib/2: • Modulus of Ig constant • Imaginary part (w.r.to Vacc) changes sign with/without beam Without half-detuning: beam current present It Vacc Ig -Ib Without half-detuning: beam current absent It=Ig Vacc Ig
Cavity control feedback loops • Tuner Loop: Adjusts resonant frequency of the cavity to minimize klystron current. Commissioned and available from Day 1. • “Half detuning” technique used to minimize klystron power transients – requires knowledge of incoming beam intensity before first injection (timing/telegram) • RF Feedback Loop: Reduces the cavity impedance at the fundamental (by factor of 20 for Q=20000, by 180 at Q = 180000). Transient beam loading + longitudinal stability. Commissioned and available from Day 1. • 1-Turn Delay Feedback: Adds another factor 10 reduction on the revolution frequency side-bands. (Transient beam loading + longitudinal stability). May not be commissioned on Day 1.
Will we need the 1-T feedback? • With RF feedback only, total cavity impedance ~ 0.4MΩ at the 400MHz fundamental • cf. instability threshold Rsh ~1MΩ at 400MHz for nominal beam • so even with nominal beam we would be just on the limit of being able to run with RF feedback only • With 43 bunches of 4x1010 ~ 0.6% of nominal intensity, we are a factor of 150 below the coupled bunch instability threshold at injection • (since the cavity step response ~10µs is large compared with the bunch spacing of ~2µs, the threshold scales approximately linearly with beam current) • Conclusion: it is not obligatory to commission the 1-Turn feedback at this stage
Beam control loops • Phase loop: Locks phase of RF onto beam (fast) to minimize emittance blowup. Can damp injection oscillations of a single batch. • Synchro loop: Locks phase of RF and beam onto frequency program (adiabatically, time constant >> phase loop). • Radial loop: Adjusts frequency to maintain radial position constant at the radial pickup. • The phase, synchro and radial loops must be commissioned with a single pilot once RF capture is achieved. • For a single batch, the phase loop will jump onto the injected beam and absorb the injection phase error. However for multi-batch injection the incoming batch will have a different phase from the circulating beam, and without the longitudinal feedback system we will have longitudinal blowup on subsequent batches. • Longitudinal feedback: Damps longitudinal oscillations due to injection errors and coupled bunch modes, using the main 400MHz RF system. Should ideally be commissioned before injecting more than one batch.
RF synchronization system • Synchronizes bunch into bucket transfer between SPS and LHC, generates pre-pulses for SPS extraction and LHC injection kickers. Commissioned and available from Day 1. • For multi-batch injection requires injection bucket number and ring identifier to be supplied on-the-fly via the timing system.
Summary • RF Power system may need connection to beam interlocks for equipment protection • RF feedback sufficient to avoid coupled bunch instabilities – no need for 1-Turn feedback • Longitudinal feedback should ideally be commissioned before injecting multiple batches if we want to control longitudinal blowup • Beam intensity, injection bucket number and ring identifier must be available via timing system