1 / 11

Registry Showcase Project

Registry Showcase Project. Kim Davies « kim@centr.org » Council of European National Top Level Domain Registries ICANN 23, Luxembourg 10 July, 2005. Best Practice for ccTLDs. Various Best Practice initiatives within CENTR over the years Two areas: Governance Best Practice

noma
Download Presentation

Registry Showcase Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Registry Showcase Project Kim Davies «kim@centr.org» Council of European National Top Level Domain Registries ICANN 23, Luxembourg 10 July, 2005

  2. Best Practice for ccTLDs • Various Best Practice initiatives within CENTR over the years • Two areas: • Governance Best Practice • Operational/Technical Best Practice • True best practice is “highest standard” • Politically problematic • Fear ccTLDs will be benchmarked against • Should rather be something to strive toward

  3. Minimum Standards • Define minimum standards for ccTLDs? • Solves political problem • Not really useful • Particularly in Europe – most would meet such standards

  4. Solution: • Develop a “registry showcase” • Resource site filled with feature projects documented • Documented in detail so experiences can be reused by other registries • Conceptual overview • Implementation notes • Contact details • Benefits: • Not a best practice – removes problem of being “judged” • Removes value judgments on what is good or not • Useful, unlike minimum standards • Regularly updatable, unlike formally approved standards document

  5. Sampling of Projects

  6. Zone Updating • Nominet UK • Handles ~3.5m domains, 15m RRs, 300k updates/day • Zone build/reload was slow (~2hrs) • New system • writes out changes in per minute blocks • applies changes with IXFR • Changes rigorously confirmed before application

  7. DNS Resilience • DENIC • New authoritative nameserver setup • Serves .de (~9m domains) with <5% utilisation • Mix of IPv4 Unicast, Anycast and IPv6 Unicast • OOB management • Mixture of software (BIND8, BIND9, NSD) • Rolling reloads performing at each site • Unnoticeable • Compiles with RFC 2870

  8. IDN Location Service • DK Hostmaster • Navigation aid for MSIE web browsers • No wildcards, zone synthesis • System of providing wayfinding with CNAME records • www.[binary] CNAME idn-redirection-site • Binary form is IDN is prevalent local encodings • UTF-8, Latin 1, Latin 9

  9. Registry Implementations • DNSSEC • EPP • ENUM • IDN • IRIS • Liberalisations / move to R-R environment

  10. Related Resources • CENTR Surveys • Conducted up to 1 per week • Complete spectrum of registry operations • Now performed online automatically with live results • Huge corpus of operational/policy oversight • Most members can now reach in and find answers on what they need • Policy Repository • New proposed project • Store various registry policies • Will aid in harmonisation work • Goal is common EPP requirements, poss. extensions

  11. Questions?

More Related