Training M&S Business Plan Presentation for M&S Working Group WJTSC 09-2

1. Training M&S Business Plan Presentation for M&S Working GroupWJTSC 09-2 August 24, 2009 Fred Hartman Institute for Defense Analyses fhartman@ida.org / 703-578-2776

2. DoD M&S Planning Responsibilities for Training M&S Training M&S Business Plan History and progress Development process & methodology Investment strategies 2009 Training Federations Training Needs, Issues, and Groups Training Capabilities Update Next Steps and Milestones Discussion Outline

3. DoD M&S Planning Vision & Goals Community Business Plans Community Business Plans 2007 Community Business Plans 2009 Community Business Plans Requirements and Technology are constantly evolving FY08 C&CC Business Plan Future Strategic Planning Enables senior OSD leaders to Impact the allocation of enterprise-level funding Biennial Iteration 3

4. Joint Training Needs – JFCOM lead Training Gaps Analysis Forum (TGAF) Includes both M&S / Technology solutions and other training enhancements Provides coordination with all stakeholders to update both joint training needs and capabilities lists Training M&S Needs – OSD R&T lead Updates the Training M&S Business Plan Represents both Joint and Services training needs for M&S and Technology enhancement Facilitates higher level visibility to issues on T2 SAG, ESG and M&S Steering Committee Enterprise-level M&S – OSD AT&L lead Provides crosscutting oversight and funding for functional communities as well as COCOMs and Services Updates the M&S Corporate & Crosscutting Business Plan Responsibilities for Training M&S

5. Experimentation JFCOM Intelligence USD(I) Acquisition AT&L Analysis PA&E & JS Planning JS & Policy Testing DOT&E & AT&L Training P&R Corporate & Crosscutting M&S Tools Corporate & Crosscutting M&S Data Corporate & Crosscutting M&S Services (SE FORUM) (JADM) (AP EXCOM) (T2 ESG) (DIMSCG) (JCDE EC) DoD Modeling & Simulation (M&S) Governance M&S Management Structure Organized by Communities. Designed to Support & Integrate M&S Activities across the Department. Led by a 1 to 2 Star M&S Steering Committee (M&S SC) to provide governance. M&S Practices Components OSD, Joint Staff, COCOMs, Services Goal: Establish corporate M&S management to address DoD goals: Leads/guides/shepherds the $Bs in DoD M&S investments; adds value thru metrics & ROI-driven priorities; and seeks to provide transparency.

6. Purpose: Link training stakeholders to Strategic Vision for DoD Modeling and Simulation Objective: Identify ways to improve and update M&S contributions to ongoing enhancements of joint training Inform the M&S Steering Committee for near term (FY 10) projects Justify major investments in training capabilities for POM submissions as required Identify capabilities that other M&S communities can leverage Inform the Corporate and Crosscutting M&S Business Plan Training M&S Business Plans

7. Provided needs baseline (training gaps) • Provided training capabilities baseline • Recommended strategies to fill gaps • Indentified Enhancements to support training needs • Recommended strategic level M&S training Investments Business Plan Development History 2007 Training M&S Business Plan 2009 Update • Update and validate training needs • Update capabilities baseline • Updated investment recommendations 2004 2009 2007

8. 2007 TMSBP published April 2008 Built on baseline training capabilities and requirements as documented in the TC AoA Provided M&S Investment Strategies Provided 2008 coordination draft update in April 2009 Indicated some progress toward M&S gaps Incorporating comments received by 31 July 2009 and being edited for publication Preparing draft 2009 TMSBP Initial draft November 2009 Coordination Draft January 2010 Final Report March 2010 Training Business Plan Progress

9. Focus on updating capabilities, gaps and needs baseline available at the end of FY 09 Incorporate training M&S Issues from the TGAF What major training M&S capabilities / enhancements since last update? How well do enhancements serve each of five levels of the training audience?Defined Training Audience (Levels 1-5) COCOM Joint Task Force (Operational) Service Component (Operational) Service (Tactical) Crew/Individual (Tactical) What are the major remaining shortfalls in each gap? What solutions might be pursued to address the remaining shortfalls? Coordinate with other M&S Communities and Corporate & Crosscutting Business Plans Training M&S Business Plan Process

10. Needs analysis conducted to provide logical threads to trace training needs to M&S issues and actions TGAF updated TC AoA Gaps to produce Training Needs, Training Groups (consolidated needs) and Issues (M&S Gaps) Builds off previous Business Plans Capabilities analysis conducted to provide an updated baseline framing M&S enhancements Existing M&S products captured in the 2008 “Capabilities Landscape” survey Inclusive Products Updated list of training needs, groups, and TGAF issues Training M&S capabilities landscape Tools, Services, Interfaces, and C4I adapters Constructive and Virtual Sims Updated investment strategy for enhancing training M&S capability Resource recommendations to fill four top TGAF Issues TMSBP Methodology

11. Common object model [JCOM 08, 09]* Rapid correlated terrain data [Space Environment Integration System (SEIS) 07, Common LVC Terrain Database 08, Training for Aviation Urban Operations (TAUO) 08] Rapid scenario-based individual and small team training [JDA I 07, JDA II 08] Architectures for common data – initialization for Operational environments [LVC Architecture Roadmap 06, 08, 09] Logistics and infrastructure [Joint Targeting and Battle Damage Assessment 07] Forces - unit and electronic order of battle Mission environment – econ, diplomatic, political, and indigenous civilian [TAUO 08] Mission environment – medical, public health, and related Cross domain security and multinational info sharing Common general-purpose interface [Standards Vetting Tool 07] Non-kinetic warfare including HUMINT [HUMINT Wargaming Trainer 07] Information Ops Network warfare – net centric environments Electronic and information warfare Second order effects for effects-based planning and operations Chemical Bio (CBRNE) including human effects * [Indicates project and year addressed by M&S SC funding] 2007 Investment Strategies

12. Training Federations for Capabilities Baseline Joint Joint Live Virtual Constructive (JLVC) Joint Multi-Resolution Model (JMRM) Army Multi Resolution Federation (Joint Land Component Constructive Training Capability (JLCCTC - MRF) Entity Resolution Federation (JLCCTC - ERF) Navy Navy Continuous Training Environment Federation (NCTE) Marine Corps USMC Deployable Virtual Training Environment Federation (DVTE) Marine Corps Federation (McFED) Air Force Air and Space Cyber Constructive Environment (ASCCE) Distributed Mission Operations Center (DMOC) SOCOM Joint Training Support Center (JTSC) 2009 Training Federations

13. Training Needs, Issues & Groups

14. Original TC AoA Training Gaps 14

15. Updated Training Needs 1 - 35 15

16. Top M&S Issues from Nov ‘08 TGAF • Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD) • Exercise Design, Conduct and Integration • Cross Domain Information Sharing (CDIS) • Joint Logistics • Note: Air Ops issue rolled into IAMD 16

17. Training Groups TG01-03 • TG 01 - Train Forces on Integrated Air & Missile Missions • TN07 Provide multi-command Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) system training • TN21 Train for Global Ballistic Missile Defense (GBMD) • TN24 Conduct Global Strike Training • TN28 Train on operational C2 systems and networks (dedicated bandwidth) • TN35 Train forces on all missile missions (Newly added Training Need) • TG 02 - Exercise Design and Integration • TN03 Provide faster/higher fidelity Mission Rehearsal • TG 03 - Train for Cross Domain Information Sharing • TN02Train forces in Joint Interagency Intergovernmental, Multinational (JIIM) environment • (including INTEL) • TN08 Train forces on Info Ops (including Info Warfare, CN Exploitation, CN Defense and CN Attack) • TN18 Train Theater / Strategic forces to conduct C4I operations using collaborative info environment • (CIE) • TN20 Train the Joint Interagency Coordination Group (JIACG) • TN32 Train forces on Strategic Information Assurance (IA) Derived from Training Gaps Analysis Forum (TGAF) 17

18. Training Groups TG04-07 TG 04 - Train for Planning, Deployment, and Realistic Logistics TN04 Train on Crisis Action planning and deployments TN06 Train forces on realistic logistics requirements - including reception, staging, and onward movement integration (RSOI), and sustainment of force to include retrograde operations TN16 Train routinely with Joint Operation Planning & Execution System (JOPES) TN19 Train routinely with new adaptive planning and deployment system TG 05 - Train JTFs (includes need for Individual Joint Training) TN01 Train CJTFs TN05 Train SJTFs TN23 Train war-fighters (Operations and Tactical level) to use National Intel Systems TN29 Train for Integration and Mobilization of Active and Reserve Components TN33 Provide Crisis Action Procedures Training TG 06 - Train forces on Irregular Warfare (IW) and PMESII TN09 Train forces on stability and support operations (SASO) TN13 Train forces for Joint Urban Operations TN17 Train on Irregular Warfare TG 07 - Train for Integrated SOF TN10 Train SOF and conventional forces for integrated operations TN25 Train staff to coordinate Personnel Recovery (PR) operations 18

19. Training Groups TG08-10 • TG 08 - Train Intel Community at the Strategic to Tactical Level • TN11 Train Intel community as they fight • TN27 Operations/Intelligence Center Training, Integration, & Command Education • TN34 Provide INTEL community SOF specific training at the Operational level • TG 09 -Train Forces in CBRNE Environment • TN12 Train to operate in CBRNE environment • TN22 Train forces in enemy CBRNE exploitation and destruction • TG 10 - Train for Integrated Homeland Defense and Consequence Management Missions • TN14 Train forces on Defense Support to Civil Authorities (DSCA) • TN15 Provide Homeland Defense Training • TN26 Train for Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) • TN30 Train on Conséquence Management Operations • TN31 Continuity of Operations 19

20. In order to update training gaps and include in the 2009 TMSBP, we need to: Validate the needs / gaps matrices with the senior stakeholders and get approval at the flag level as we did in 2004 Refresh the baseline capabilities as documented in the 2007 Edition and extend them to the new updated training needs matrix, and Build the justification for major improvements to take our training LVC tools and simulations into the net-centric data and services environments of the coming GIG Must have senior level commitment and buy-in to support funding - thus the need to work this up through the T2 SAG and potentially the ESG for validation Why Do an Update Now?

21. Training Capabilities Update

22. Purpose: Identify current training M&S community capabilities Organizations: Army, Navy, USAF, USMC, COCOMs Capabilities Constructive Simulation Virtual Simulator Tools Interfaces C4I Architectures (Federation, HLA, DIS) Training Capabilities Input

23. Training Federations Surveyed Joint Joint Live Virtual Constructive (JLVC) Joint Multi-Resolution Model (JMRM) Army Multi Resolution Federation (Joint Land Component Constructive Training Capability (JLCCTC - MRF) Entity Resolution Federation (JLCCTC - ERF) Navy Navy Continuous Training Environment Federation (NCTE) Marine Corps USMC Deployable Virtual Training Environment Federation (DVTE) Marine Corps Federation (McFED) Air Force Air and Space Cyber Constructive Environment (ASCCE) Distributed Mission Operations Center (DMOC) SOCOM Joint Training Support Center (JTSC) 2008 Training Federations

24. M&S Landscape Overview Constructive Simulations, Tools, & Interfaces • 35 Constructive Simulations • 17 Interfaces • 19 Tools • 66 Simulators Virtual Simulations • 44 C4I Devices C4I

25. Consolidate staffing comments on 2008 edition and publish report Collaborate with Common & Crosscutting BP team Provide emerging capabilities and gaps Continue to refine training M&S capabilities baseline Validate training requirements (TGAF Training Needs) with a T2 SAG in Sep/Oct 09 Continue to identify/refine/validate training M&S needs for 2009/10 report Provide coordination draft report in January 2010 Provide update brief at the WJTSC 10-1 Summary - 2009 Next Steps

26. 2009 TMSBP Milestones

27. Questions & Discussion

28. Eight Training Federations Joint Joint Live Virtual Constructive (JLVC) Joint Multi-Resolution Model (JMRM) Army Multi Resolution Federation (Joint Land Component Constructive Training Capability (JLCCTC - MRF)) Entity Resolution Federation (JLCCTC - ERF) Navy Battle Force Tactical Trainer (BFTT) Navy Continuous Training Environment Federation (NCTE) Marine USMC Deployable Virtual Training Environment Federation (DVTE) Air Force Air Constructive Environment (ACE) 2007 Survey Federations

29. Constructive Simulations Integrated Planned Integration 29

30. Tool: A federate that monitors, manipulates, stores, or retrieves simulation data or information but is not a simulation Federation Tools Integrated Planned Integration

31. Interface: Connects different simulation architectures or connects training systems to operational C4ISR devices Federation Interface Integrated Planned Integration

32. Virtual Simulations USAF Integrated Planned Integration US Army 32

33. Virtual Simulations (Cont) USMC Integrated US Navy Integrated Planned Integration

34. Virtual Simulations (Cont) USSOCOM Integrated Planned Integration

35. Operational Command and Control 35 Integrated

36. Mission rehearsal capability (rapid data) Rapid Database Development Shortening the Joint Exercise Life Cycle Adaptable constructive training systems Ability to train nonkinetic processes and activities Multi-level security Multi-echelon training Strategic context (Multi-national) Emerging concepts (Irregular Warfare) Emerging missions (Inter-agency) Embedded training capability Synthetic Natural Environment improvements * Gaps from the TC AoA discussed in the TMSBP, 2007 Edition Training Priorities Traditional Priorities and Areas of Interest*

37. Data Prepare tagging and formatting for reuse and GIG Collaborate with other communities for reuse Provide rapid scenario generation supporting mission rehearsals Joint Data Alternatives (JDA) Study Joint Rapid Scenario Generation (JRSG) Concept Decision Pilot Infrastructure Persistent, reusable LVC distributed environment LVC Architecture Roadmap Study Build today with the GIG in mind Reusable simulation software for distributed applications Corporate M&S Services Provide OSD leadership for VV&A, Architectures & Standards across the enterprise Ongoing M&S Areas for Improvement