280 likes | 462 Views
M. Butterfly : a Poststructuralist Approach. Image Society Q & A as metatheatre & as parody 3) role play: 1) power relations ; 2) identity construction ; 3) fiction and history 4) Orientalism and the other discourses in the play; MB as a self-deconstructing play. Image Society: Q & A.
E N D
M. Butterfly : a Poststructuralist Approach Image Society Q & A asmetatheatre& as parody 3) role play: 1) power relations; 2) identity construction; 3) fiction and history 4)Orientalism and the other discourses in the play; MB as a self-deconstructing play
Image Society: Q & A • Why are we surrounded or bombarded by images? How is this related to postmodernism, poststructuralism and postmodernity? • What are the consequences of the domination of images? • Do you agree with my interpretation of The Living Mall? 4. Do you think that a pastiche like Moulin Rouge is a-historical or merely “spectacular? How about “Losing My Religion”?
M. Butterfly as metatheatre “"Metatheatre" is a convenient name for the quality or force in a play which challenges theatre's claim to be simply realistic -- to be nothing but a mirror in which we view the actions and sufferings of characters like ourselves, suspending our disbelief in their reality. ”(source) (more definition of metafiction)
metatheatre Marks those frames and boundaries that conventional dramatic realism would hide. we are forced to acknowledge the estranging frame, or break the frame of the "fourth wall" of conventional theatre, reaching out to assault the audience or to draw it into the realm of the play Thus calls attention to the strangeness, artificiality, illusoriness, or arbitrariness of theatre and also the life we live in (source)
M. Butterfly metatheatrical elements? Direct address to the audience:pp. 4; 7; 9 Stage direction– 1)mixing of the Chinese and western elements p. 1; elements of Chinese opera Sc 9; the ending 2)Multiple space; multiple text/power relations e.g. 57 3) costume change: pp. 14 role-play Characters as (writers and) performers Pinkerton -- Gallimard, Marc – Sharpless Chin – Suzuki; Song – Cio-Cio Sang;
M. Butterfly metatheatrical elements? Purposes of the ‘meta’ aspects: Life as performances of different roles (subject position provided by discourses) which are defined in terms of each other. -- Madame Butterfly performed and adapted to his version of the story. The problem is that he is not the only “author.” -- conflicting versions of “history” --in the play and in history. Critique of Butterfly a stereotype of “Oriental woman”
M. Butterfly:a critical parody of Orientalism (definition) examples of Westerner view of the Chinese: Helga – pp. 18 “old”; MB; martial art; Gallimard’s gaining power p. 36 –38; his inside knowledge 45; parody of Madame Butterfly? MB included (e.g. 5-8; 13; 42 ) and then criticized p. 10 or revised (p. 66; p. 84; ) more subtle criticism: Juxtaposition of “Love Duet” and girlie magazine pp. 11-; Song by the window 25; p. 41
Roles & Difference Why do the characters take roles which are oppositeto each other? -- “Vive la différence!” p. 4; “bad” defined in relation to “good”; man defined in relation to “woman.” Why does Song takes the role after criticizing it? -- discrepancies between rhetoric and “realities” 59; -- a matter of role-play. -- “very few of us would pass up the opportunity to be Pinkerton.” (42)
Binary Opposites:G/Marc vs. Women 1) Womanizer: Marc: pp. 8-9; 24-25; pp. 32-33 2) Western women—strong or not lovable: Helga, Isabelle p. 32-33, Renee 54-; 3) Oriental “woman”: submissive & pleasing; the “Other” to help define the self.
Binaries Relativized (1) Madame Chrysanthemum 1) Mutual definition of roles. Madame Butterfly While G is gaining power, he needs encouragement.
Binaries Relativized (2) Switching Roles G’s power vs. Song’s power 1) Song: anti-Orientalism; Gallimard: attracted (like and dislike MB), sees Song as “sour grape” p. 19 2) Song: “Western”; distanced from her culture. Gallimard: aware of imperialism; distanced from his values; 3) Song: “But sometimes . . . “ (p. 22) G: feel able to “flirt” power relations 4) Song: “Do you forgive me?” p. 26
Role PlayG vs. Song (2) 5) G’s thirst intensified p. 27; Song’s role as Oriental woman: 1) Anna May Wong; inferiority complex pp. 27-28; as a Chinese girl 31; 6) G’s eight-week torture of Song and his ascension to power pp. 31 – (Toulon as “God”) 7) Intrusion of comrade Chin 47 8) Discussion of infertility p. 50
Power Relativized & Subverted 1. While Song is re-gaining his power: he continues and exaggerates the role of Oriental woman. (p. 51; 65 - 66) 2. G: When G wants to gain more power (p. 54 ) --not from Renee but from Song-- he actually loses it.(56)
Power Plays; the play of signifiers No one has absolute power. Power has to be confirmed by those subordinate to it, or by chances in reality. e.g. Toulon’s test of Gallimard. P. 57 • Gallimard goes back to Song after being denied by Renee and Toulon in turns. • Butterfly as the weakest becomes an empty sign of power (like the purloined letter whose content is not important.)
Identity Construction Roles = Clothes = Identity? • Costume change on the stage: 9, 14, 86-87 2) Renee: We fight wars because we wear clothes. P. 55 We assume different positions of power. 2) Kimono + yahoo 59 3) Gallimard not undressing Song. 60 -- Is there truth underneath clothes? Or is clothing a part of identity? -- Does Gallimard turns to “really” love Song at the end of Scene 6. What’s the “something new, something unnatural, . . . Something very close to love”?
Competing Versions of Fiction • G as an author p. 4; 2) Song: ironic overtones: pp. 30; 41; 51; 63 3) Song’s intrusion: pp. 47(scene 4); 63 (Scene 7),67, 78-79 4) Final switching of roles: -- “theatre of China” 85 -- stripping to take another role “ a man, and not just a man.” your fantasy “Butterfly? Butterfly?”
History and Fiction: Official history • The story—set in 1960-1970 in Beijin; 1966 - (1968)-- 1986 in Paris; Why? Connecting sexual politics to (Inter-)national politics time of war and revolutions Traces of public history in M. Butterfly: -- the play of power between Toulon and Gallimard (Toulon being the “God”?—transcendental signifier) -- e.g. changes of power of Comrade Chin Scene 10 –11 (Chairman Mao)
History and Fiction: Official history Historical Background the subversion of several authorities -- Cultural revolution -- 1966-1976; fixed roles -- Vietnam War : History: 1860 – French colonization started, followed by Japan during WWII; After WWII ~ 1955: France fought hard to regain their former territories without success. 1954-- the country divided into North and South
History and Fiction : Official history 1955 -- the U.S.’s involvement 1961-- support forces arriving since then, Nov. 1963-- President Diem overthrown and executed. 1965 -- US intense bombing started, 1969 -- US’s withdrawal started, 1973 –total withdrawal May 1975 -- the fall of Saigon. France: May 68: France's month of revolution -- a week of clashes there between extreme right wing groups and students campaigning against the Vietnam War. (More strikes and demonstration followed)
History and Fiction (2): historical figures History of Bernard Bouriscot and Shi Peipu –differences from M. Butterfly (source: 20/20) -- Six months after their friendship, Shi Peipu said he was not the man he appeared to be, but was a woman in disguise as a man. -- BB no previous sexual experience; -- BB: stayed in China twice: left China in 1966, went back four years later to search for Shi and their son. -- because he was obsessed with being able to continue to see Peipu, Bernard began smuggling secret documents out of the French embassy and bringing them to the two Communist Party officials. (in China)
History and Fiction History of Bernard Bouriscot and Shi Peipu –differences from M. Butterfly -- called back to France. He had affairs with women, but he also realized he was sexually attracted to men. -- 1982, Shi visited Paris with his son. -- 1986 caught because of their spy acts.
History and Fiction (4): B’s version BERNARD BOURSICOT: And instead of beating him, I told, “But I want to see.” And he told, “Oh, it does not matter, no problem.” And he took his pants down and he told me, “You can see.” And a week after, I wanted to die, because I was thinking, “Okay, now I am not only a prisoner, not only a spy, but a foolish person.” B: . . . there is the theory that you were homosexual all those years ago, but couldn't face it, and so you allowed yourself to be deceived. How do you answer that? BERNARD BOURSICOT: It is possible, but it's not the sole explanation.
History and Fiction (5): P’s versopm BARBARA WALTERS: Just a friend? SHI PEIPU:(through interpreter) Of course. BARBARA WALTERS: Nothing more? SHI PEIPU: (through interpreter)Yes, but there is no use talking about it. It's over. It's over. BARBARA WALTERS: How did you meet Monsieur Boursicot? SHI PEIPU: (through interpreter)I have forgotten, and besides, I don't speak about him anymore. BARBARA WALTERS: Did you ever tell Monsieur Boursicot that you were a woman? SHI PEIPU: (through interpreter)He said that? I don't think so. I'm not crazy like that.
Orientalism "Orientalism is a Western style for dominating, reconstructing and having authority over the Orient" (E. Said Orienatalism Introduction 3). It is supported by a large group of discourses ranging from travelogue, letters to academic studies. Its constructions of ‘the Orient’ are usually stereotypical.
Anna May Wong Anna May Wong and Douglas Fairbanks Sr.;from The Thief of Bagdad (United Artists, 1924).
References “THE STRANGEST LOVE STORY OF ALL - THE REAL M BUTTERFLY.” Program script. ABC’s 20/20, segment #02. Anchor: Barbara Walters. Date: Aug 12, 1994.
Assignments for next week • Finish M. Butterfly if you have not. 2. . Lecture 2: Theory & Examples: anti-foundationalism & metafiction (to the section before Icicle Thief) 3. Lecture 3: Theory & Examples:2. F. Jameson