1 / 10

The Ageing Population, Pensions and Wealth Creation

The Ageing Population, Pensions and Wealth Creation. A report by Tomorrow’s Company. There is no ageing crisis. As a society we can afford to grow old.

Download Presentation

The Ageing Population, Pensions and Wealth Creation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Ageing Population, Pensions and Wealth Creation A report by Tomorrow’s Company

  2. There is no ageing crisis • As a society we can afford to grow old. • At a mere 1.75 per cent productivity growth per year by 2045, an average British worker will be about twice as productive as today. In other words, a doubling of new value and resources being produced, while the ratio of over 64s to the rest of the population grows by less than 20 per cent.

  3. Support ratios • The particular demographic statistic that has helped create a sense of crisis is the old age support ratio. • This is the ratio between the population of working age (16-64) and the numbers 65 or over. • In 2003 there were 4.1 people of working age for every person over state pensionable age; by 2041 there will be only 2.36 people of working age for every pensioner – a fall of 42%.

  4. The economic support ratio • The key variable is not so much the old age support ratio as the balance between economically active and inactive persons – the economic support ratio. • This ratio was 0.92 of a worker for every dependent in 2003 and is projected to be 0.80 by 2041 - a fall of only 13%. • Incidentally the ratio was less favourable in the past. It was 0.72 in 1981.

  5. Not all old people need ‘support’ In 2002/3 the top 20 per cent of retired households in terms of disposable income paid £8,392 in taxes and received £7,557 in pension and benefits from the taxpayer (some of which, such as the disability living allowance were not age related).

  6. The savings gap • Another factor creating a sense of crisis has been the references to a huge savings gap – a ‘black hole’ variously estimated at £27billion and some £50 billion. • However, the problem is not so much that as a nation we are not saving enough. It is rather that half the population have substantial savings and the other half have very little. Only 44% of 16 to 64 year olds have a private pension.

  7. Why people are not saving • Low incomes leave no margin for saving • Means testing • Commission and charges • Debt • Loss of trust in financial services • Cultural factors • Decline in company schemes.

  8. Savings and investment • Savings do not ensure an adequate level of investment in the future of the economy. Their main impact is to drive up the prices of shares and bonds – to levels that ultimately prove unsustainable. • The only savings that will help pay for future pensions are those that are channelled into productive investments in capital goods or in R and D and skills development.

  9. Later retirement • As longevity and health improve many people will both wish and be able to work longer. • Many older workers have skills, experience and attributes that are beneficial to an employer and to the economy as a whole. • What is uncertain is what the level of demand for older workers will be. • There would be little point in raising state pensionable age to 67 if most people were unable to find employment up to that age.

  10. A citizen’s pension • Tomorrow’s Company supports the idea of a universal taxpayer-funded state pension based on residency. • This would remove the deterrent to saving created by means testing, would improve the position of women, would give the poorest people in our society a firm promise of a degree of security in old age. It would have the virtue of simplicity, both in administration, and in terms of being understood by the public.

More Related