1 / 28

FORCE PROJECTION SYMPOSIUM

Learn about the AS&C role in tech transition facilitation at the symposium. Explore programs, challenges, and objectives in transitioning advanced systems and concepts into fielded capabilities.

normand
Download Presentation

FORCE PROJECTION SYMPOSIUM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FORCE PROJECTION SYMPOSIUM SUE PAYTON Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Advanced Systems & Concepts) May 2003

  2. AS&C Role: Tech Transition Facilitator • Focus on innovation & transformation • Serving joint and core military capabilities • Attuned to joint Combatant Commander requirements • Committed to transition of successful AS&C demonstration & comparative testing programs into fielded capabilities • Facilitates cooperative Service/CoCom tech transition efforts • Participates in requirements, resources & tech provider fora • Aims to expand commercial/coalition participation in tech transition We don’t make the capability, we make the capability better

  3. A B C Initial Product/ Process Capability Product/Process Development Product/Process Insertion Product/Process Improvement & Sustainment AS&C Transition Programs Across Acquisition Life Cycle Systems Acquisition (Engineering Development, Demonstration, LRIP & Production) Pre-Systems Acquisition Sustainment & Maintenance IOC Production & Deployment System Development & Demonstration Concept & Tech Development Support ACTDs Joint Warfighting Program (JWP) Tech Transition Initiative Defense Acquisition Challenge FY03 Foreign Comparative Testing Dual Use Science & Technology - DUS&T Independent Research & Development TechLink Manufacturing Technology - ManTech Title III of the Defense Production Act

  4. Technology transition programs can work in harmony or independently but they all share a common goal - to accelerate the best technologies available to the warfighter into residual capabilities, acquisition programs and ongoing sustainment. AS&C Technology Transition Tools Dual Use S&T COSSI JOINT CAPABILITIES Sustainability Deployability Affordability Flexibility Survivability Agility Tech Transition Initiative ACTDs Military Utility for Joint Warfighter Capabilities Manufacturing Hurdles Manufacturing Technology DPA Title III Program Manufacturing Technology Title III Program Commercial Opportunities Foreign Comparative Testing Defense Acquisition Challenge

  5. ACTD Objectives • Get new, relevant, mature technology to warfighters quickly • Overcome resistance to transformational concepts • Assist integration of technology and joint doctrine • Enhance combatant commander options for integrated employment of core Military Service capabilities ACTD Prime Customers:Joint Combatant Commanders OTT/Comparative Testing Prime Customers:Military Services

  6. ACTD Anatomy • Addresses important military need with MATURETECHNOLOGY • Provides a technical solution with demonstrated ops concepts • Evaluates solution in field demonstrations by warfighters • Usually JOINT, often multi-service, often combined/coalition • Multi-agency • Developer Military Service /Agency: Technical Manager • Sponsoring CoCom: Operational Manager • Lead Military Service/Agency: Transition Manager • RAPID: 1 - 3 Years or less - to Final Demonstration/Prototype • 2 Years of Support for Residuals and Transition

  7. ACTD Metrics Formal Success Objectives • Rapid transition to Defense Program of Record • Satisfaction of operational requirement with residuals • Confirmation that technology/op concept appropriate/inappropriate for joint military use Informal Success Objectives • Develop operational concepts (DOTMLFP) employing proposed technologies • Contribute technical elements into existing/new programs Informal Failure Indicators • Overlook technologies to solve known military problems • Allow spiraling technologies/requirements to postpone transitions • Pursuing low risk technologies to ensure successful demonstrations • Focus on popular single-service ACTDs at expense of tough joint efforts

  8. ACTD Relevance Requirements Pull Technology Push Focused Logistics Joint Integrated Architecture Joint WarfightingS&T Plan Battlespace Awareness Command & Control Force Application Protection …5 Architectures, Each Representing Both Near and Far Term Needs …5 Chapters in JWSTP, Each Aligned With Joint Integrated Architecture Identified leader/members on both panels

  9. Joint Capabilities Battlespace Awareness Command & Control Joint Capabilities Force Application Focused Logistics Protection Joint Mission Areas Missile Defense Fires Intelligence Maneuver Aviation Core Military Capabilities ARMY NAVY USMC USAF Joint Capabilities allow CoComs to employ core military capabilities as a coherent, integrated force at strategic, operational & tactical levels of engagement

  10. ACTD Timeline ACTD DEMO Selection Residuals & Enter Acquisition Terminate or Rtn to Tech Base Residuals ACTD Operational Use Tech Testing Op Eval Dev/Integration 1 – 3 Years 2 Years

  11. ACTD Program Process FY03 Selection Process (FY04 Candidates) FY04 ACTD Candidates Oct 02 Breakfast Club Jan 03 ACTD Rep Conf. Jan 03 JROC JWCA CoComs Services Nov.-Jan. Technology Inputs Services, Agencies, Industry, Allies December-February Needs JRP/JRB/JROC May 03 AT&L Approval of 04 ACTDs Jun 03 Coord. AT&L/JS May 03 CoComs/Services Ranking of 04 ACTDs Mar/Apr 03 FY05 Candidate B.Club Jan. ‘04 Final 05 Candidates For ranking Feb. ’04 Call for’05 ACTDs Jun-Oct ‘03 04 ACTD Imp Direct. Sep 03 ACTD Managers Conf Sep ‘03 CoComs & Services Rank ‘05s Mar. ‘04 ‘05 ACTDs JRP,JRB, JROC Apr ‘04

  12. ACTD S&T Funding Profile(Includes 6.1—6.2—6.3 funding) OSD (AS&C) ACTD Funding accounts for approx 2% of S&T dollars $10,773 $10,231 $9,873 $8,933

  13. ACTD Funding Profile Budget Vs. Appropriation Strong Congressional Support for the ACTD Program

  14. ACTD Funding AllocationFY 2002-2004 FY-2004 President’s Budget Submit

  15. FY-2003 ACTD ResourcesParticipation Across FYDP

  16. ACTD Program Success ACTD Product Results • Total ACTDs FY95-03 = 115 • Total ACTDs Completed = 45 • Total ACTD Products = 136 Includes Ongoing ACTDs More thanThirty ACTDs Employed in Operations Enduring Freedom, Noble Eagle, and Operations Iraqi Freedom

  17. ACTDs Supporting Force Projection • Theater Support Vessel • Joint Area Clearance • Advanced Technology Ordnance Surveillance • Contamination Avoidance at Seaports of Debarkation • Joint Theater Logistics • Coalition Theater Logistics • Precision Extended Glide Airdrop System • Future Tactical Truck System • Agile Transportation for 21st Century • Deployable Cargo Screening • Joint Decision Support & Response • Predator • Global Hawk • Coalition Information Assurance Common Operation Picture Delivering Joint Logistics Capabilities

  18. Theater Support Vessel Objective & Capabilities • Increased Deployability: 40+ Knots Loaded • Increased Payload: 30,000 Sq Ft/1250 ST Capacity • Increased Range: 4700+ NM @ 40+ Knots • Increased Survivability: Sea State 7+ (Waves up to 40 Feet) • Improved Situational Awareness: Enroute Mission PlanningJoint Interoperable C4ISR • Increased Responsiveness: Integrated Unit DeliveryBy-Passed Theater Chokepoints Access to Austere Ports Reduced Asymmetric Threats • Improved Velocity: Sustains Deployment MomentumOffsets/Complements Strategic Airlift Improves Throughput Optimize INTRA- THEATER LIFT Increases Ports Accessible To JTF Commander By a Factor of 5

  19. Maintain The MSR Joint Area Clearance (JAC) Widen The Breach Clear Logistics Sites/Areas Maneuver Force Logistics Element Maneuver Force Main Supply Route Front Line JRTC conducts clearance operations. …..very limited success in these missions …8 hours to clear 100 meters...…” lack clearance technology, limited route clearance doctrine, and unit training shortfalls”- ….S&T investments focus on Breaching not Clearance… Significant mine & UXO Clearance Capability Shortfall Exists. “The OPFOR will place mines everywhere and continually reseed minefields that are breached.” Joint Mission: Joint PUB 3-15, Multiservice Procedures: FM100-3, MCRP 4-5.1, NWP TP 3-02.4.1, ACCPAM 10-752

  20. Advanced Technology Ordnance Surveillance Objectives: • Improve munitions readiness • Improve munitions safety & surveillance • Improve overall munitions stockpile management • Improve munitions logistics • Significantly enhance inventory accuracy & asset visibility Technology: • COTS component integration of RFID and MEMS sensors • Ordnance MIS system software integration • Mature/maturing commercial technologies Residuals: • Demo configures 2 ships and 2+ magazines ashore. • Ready for service-wide acquisition • Application to other non-ordnance commodities • CONOPS, Military Utility Assessment result Participants: • EUCOM • U.S. Navy • U.S. Army

  21. Contamination Avoidance at Seaports of Debarkation (CASPOD) Objectives: • Develop and demonstrate resident, pre-positioned, or rapidly transportable chem-bio defense materiel packages and force structure • Identify strategic operational improvements / shortfalls for CASPOD contingencies Participants: U. S. Army, CENTCOM, TRANSCOM PACOM & DTRA

  22. OPLAN/Log Plan COA analysis OPLAN/Log Plan COA analysis Joint Theater Logistics (JTL) Objective: Provide the Joint Force Commander with a near real-time, collaborative operations and logistics capability that will support logistic planning, execution, monitoring, and rapid re-planning Virtual Log Book Virtual Plan Book Odyssey & DoD & COE Collaboration Tool Suites Geospatial Force Planning Tool Digital Representation of the Plan Intel Ops Log Product: GCCS and GCSS decision tools & components

  23. manual review? manual review? coalition web portal GCSS web portal Coalition X planners coalition web portal GCSS data mediator Coalition Y planners coalition web portal Coalition Z planners logistics databases & data services Coalition Theater Logistics (CTL) Objective: Extend the Joint Theater Ops/Logistics planning & execution tools into the Coalition environment U.S. Logistics planners CTL DBs JTL Tools Related country data pulls multi- Domain dissemination server Product: GCCS and GCSS decision tools & components

  24. PEGASYS Problem: Inability to sustain combat power for joint force projection in an expanded high tempo operational environment. Objective: High altitude, cost effective, autonomous precision resupply via air delivery 25K + FT MSL SOF Army (UA) USMC Up to 30 KM Technologies: decelerators, actuators, guidance, navigation and control, mission planning & real time CARP updates • Lead Service: Army • Sponsor: JFCOM • Schedule: Demo FY04-06 Residuals FY07-08 Residuals: 3-5 A/C systems & 4-6 airdrop systems Comments: Major sustainment enabler and footprint reducer

  25. Future Tactical Truck System(FTTS) • Technology Solutions: • Hybrid electric, advanced suspension, advanced load handling, and embedded diagnostics • Residual: • 7 Maneuver Sustainment Vehicles (MSV) and 10 Utility Vehicles (UV) Problem: Current Tactical Wheeled Vehicles lack capabilities required to support the Unit of Action in the Objective Force. Objectives: Leverage current technologies to create a seamless distribution system to support the Objective Force. Comments: Reduced Log footprint via reduced fuel consumption, ultra reliability, and integrated LHS with direct inter-modal interface, and C-130 deployable with partial load. • Lead Svc: ARMY • Sponsor: PACOM • Executing Agent: National Automotive Center (NAC) • Schedule: Build/Test: FY04 Demo: FY05-06 • Residual: FY06-07

  26. AS&C ACTD Outlook • Maintain focus on primary customers: Combatant Commanders • Provide sustainable joint warfighter capabilities • Emphasize transformational technology & operations • Generate, demonstrate and field “80% solutions” • Aim for fast delivery of hands-on prototypes • Keep moving - maintain rapid spiral tech insertions • Use new transition strengths of OTT and Comparative Testing Office for joint capabilities • Pursue commercial/coalition partnerships • Engage Military Services in joint ventures • Seek equitable new processes to field & sustain joint capabilities

  27. Acquisition, Technology & Logistics

  28. Advanced Systems & Concepts • Formulate and execute policy, programs and initiatives to promote effective transition of technologies and enabling operational concepts from applied engineering to fielded and sustained military capabilities with emphasis on joint missions. • Sponsor, direct and execute technology transition efforts within OSD (AT&L) • Sponsor, coordinate and execute the Quick Reaction Technology Transition incentive • Rapidly provide emergent technology and integrated CONOPS to joint warfighters • Sponsor, direct and execute the Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration Program • Sponsor and direct the Joint Adaptive Warfighting (JAWP) Program and DART Red Team • Sponsor and direct the Joint Experimentation (JE) Program • Provide Service and joint warfighters with emergent commercial and military technology through rapid comparative testing • Sponsor, direct and execute the Foreign Comparative Test (FCT) Program & Defense Acquisition Challenge 03 • Explore and encourage coalition efforts on transition of emergent military technologies and enabling CONOPs • Provide incentives to produce or improve production of critical military technologies • Sponsor and direct Defense Production Act (Title III) incentives • Sponsor and direct the Manufacturing Technology Program • Sponsor and execute the North American Trade Industrial Base Organization • Encourage efficient technology transition between military and commercial market sectors • Revitalize, sponsor and direct the Advanced Technology Insertion Program (formerly COSSI) • Expand efforts to recover DoD technology investments through initiatives such as patents and licensing • As delegated by USD(AT&L), sponsor efforts for technical enhancement of joint Personnel Recovery missions • Provide technical and CONOPs development support for designated special operations projects

More Related