1 / 22

Revision of MTSF 2010

Revision of MTSF 2010. Portfolio Committee for Justice and Constitutional Development 9 February 2011. Contents. Introduction Auditor General’s comments on Performance Information Removed KPI’s Revised KPI’s Next Steps. INTRODUCTION.

numbersa
Download Presentation

Revision of MTSF 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Revision of MTSF 2010 Portfolio Committee for Justice and Constitutional Development 9 February 2011

  2. Contents • Introduction • Auditor General’s comments on Performance Information • Removed KPI’s • Revised KPI’s • Next Steps

  3. INTRODUCTION • In April 2010, our strategic plan (MTSF 2010/14) was approved in parliament for implementation in the current year. • Subsequent to this approval, there have been two major concerns that necessitate a revision to this document: • Firstly, our audit report for 2009/10 contains strategic planning findings that we are expected to address during the current year. These findings were only released in June 2010 after the finalisation of our strategic plan. After a thorough review of our strategy, we agree with the Auditor General and therefore this tabling seeks to correct this shortfall. The Auditor General was consulted during this process and agreed that the department will be audited on the basis of the approved strategy duly amended by this process (revised KPI’s as tabled). • Secondly, we need to response to the new outcomes-based framework of government. Our KPI’s did not respond adequately to this as the strategy was signed in April and the delivery agreement was signed in October. • For these reasons, a revision was done.

  4. MANAGEMENT COMMENTS FOR THE 2009/10 AUDIT • The revision of the KPI’s will therefore address the following findings and avoid a repeat:

  5. KPI’S THAT WERE REMOVED • Below is the list of KPI’s that were removed as well as the reason for the removal

  6. KPI’S THAT WERE REMOVED

  7. KPI’S THAT WERE REMOVED • Below is the list of KPI’s that were removed as well as the reason for the removal

  8. KPI’S THAT WERE REMOVED • Below is the list of KPI’s that were removed as well as the reason for the removal

  9. REVISED INDICATORS • The attached document shows the revised indicators, taking into account the guidelines stipulated by the Auditor General, which are: • Ensuring that the indicators are Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant and Time-bound • Separating the target and the indicator to allow a multi-year view • Include strategic plans for other programmes funded by the DOJCD

  10. REVISED INDICATORS

  11. REVISED INDICATORS

  12. REVISED INDICATORS

  13. REVISED INDICATORS

  14. REVISED INDICATORS

  15. REVISED INDICATORS

  16. REVISED INDICATORS

  17. REVISED INDICATORS

  18. REVISED INDICATORS

  19. REVISED INDICATORS

  20. REVISED INDICATORS

  21. NEXT STEPS • Should the proposal be accepted, the following steps will be taken: • Quarter 3 report will be rewritten using revised indicators; • The revised KPI’s will be used in the compilation of the annual report

  22. THANK YOU

More Related