1 / 46

Techniques for High Performance Solid State Detectors

This review covers the principles of operation, design techniques, and measurement methods for high performing solid state detectors, including strip detectors and new technologies. It also discusses environmental design considerations and the use of position sensors.

nvasquez
Download Presentation

Techniques for High Performance Solid State Detectors

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Solid State Detectors- 3 T. Bowcock

  2. 1 Position Sensors 2 Principles of Operation of Solid State Detectors 3 Techniques for High Performance Operation 4 Environmental Design 5 Measurement of time 6 New Detector Technologies Schedule

  3. Techniques for High Performance Operation • Strip Detectors • Design and Fabrication Issues • What to avoid!

  4. Review... • In the p-strip in n-bulk (“p-in-n”) detectors • Vdep=100V • Energy to create electron hole pair is • 3.6eV ( not 1.1eV-why? ) • Average energy lost/mm • 39keV (108eh/ mm) -V Al Si + -

  5. Drift • Electric field in Depleted region linear • 300mm detector • at 100V E=3.0keV/cm • Diffusion/Drift by multiple collisions • Takes 7ns for e’s, 20ns for holes Higher diffusion at low temps!

  6. Ballistic Deficit Charge lost is known as the ballistic deficit Collection time

  7. Strip Pitch and Readout Pitch and resolution • Select it: d Single strip has d/12 d/10

  8. Choosing the Pitch • Why not make it infinitely small • transverse diffusion • 10-20 microns • construction • readout electronics! • Readout pitch • not necessarily the same as diode pitch (cost$$$) 75mm readout (25mm diode)

  9. Intermediate Strips • Work by capacitive coupling • induced current/charge is that seen by the electrons and holes (not a post-facto charge sharing!) • Why no broader strips ? • Interstrip capacitance <1pF Need field map!

  10. Intermediate Strips? • Loose signal • An option if • limited by resources • little noise in electronics (slow e’s) • Optimal choice is • readout each strip • pitch and width evaluated by FEA • pitch between 20 microns and 100 microns

  11. Performance 50 mm with intermediate strip 25mm readout

  12. Resolution • Test your resolution • series of particles of known position • testbeam telescope • cosmic telescope • longwavelength laser

  13. Checking Resolution Optical fiber • Tests • laser • problems? • transparancy • cosmics • slower • testbeam • expensive • labour intensive Focus to 5 mm 1064nm Si transparent

  14. Two Track Resolution • Reconstruction position as a function of proximity of one track to another

  15. Occupancy • Best to reduce occupancy • 1% considered the benchmark • 10% too high • Reduce the length of strips • usually about 6cm • reduce to 1cm for example

  16. AC Coupling Revisited • e=0.34pF/cm • 200nm oxide • 10pF/cm • Greater than Interstrip capacitance • Electronics at ground!

  17. Double Sided • Needs AC coupling! • Correlation of signals • Strips can run opposite directions • 2D style r/o -V - - - - + + + + 0V

  18. Double Sided Detector • Would like electronics at one end • Can get correlated measurement (E) giving x/y measurement • Reduces fakes • Punchthrough

  19. Double Metal • Add another routing layer • more processing via • Expense can double • Built in stresses in SiO2 can warp Si wafer badly

  20. Double Metal Can also use to route on single sided detectors

  21. Strips

  22. Example of Double Metal Detectors • LHCb prototypes

  23. Bond Pads • Structure you will often see Typically 80 by 200 microns

  24. n-strip detectors • We can make single sided n-strip detectors (note depletion!)

  25. Field Plates • MOS structures

  26. p-stops • Individual p-stops

  27. Operating Voltage • High (overvoltage is desirable) • 250V • reduced ballistic deficit • BUT • introduces very high field regions? • Avalanche will set in if field exceeds 30V/m

  28. Analysis of structure

  29. Electric Field Sample field map

  30. Guard Rings • Reduce fields at edge

  31. Micro-Discharges • Discharges may be seen as in increase in the noise with voltage

  32. Si Choices • Resistivity • n-type • p-strips • n-strips • double sided • p-type • Crystal orientation

  33. Benchmark measures • Charge Collection Efficiency • Partial Depletion • Ballistic Deficit

  34. Fabrication • Control of all steps critical • Of special interest • resistor values • implantation • oxide quality for breakdown • quality of lithography

  35. Quality Assurance • Job of the physicist is to measure all the key parameters of the detectors • IV and CV • interstrip capacitance • resistor values • lightspot response

  36. Readout Chain

  37. F/E Electronics • Binary vs Analog • Amplifier Characteristics • rise time and falltime • undershoot • Digital Performance • pipeline & logic • Noise

  38. Hybrid Design

  39. Noise • Hybrid is often a source of noise • bad grounding for electronics • bad grounding for supplies to detector • sensor,analog and digital all connected • The detector, f/e electronics and the hybrid should be regarded as one unit or MODULE

  40. Module and Mounting

  41. Material Budget • Ideally should be as low as possible • avoid high mass materials • gold • Good detector about 1% of a radiation length

  42. Example: DELPHI barrel

  43. Offline Analysis • Can give improvement in resolution w L R Only true if charge uniform and if the width of the cluster matches the strip width In general we have a Gaussian distribution of width determined by the diffusion coefficient (for normal incidence) d x

  44. Offline • Corrections for the angle of the track and the known (measured) charge sharing can give great improvement • 20 to 30% in the case of 25 microns pitch detectors • Good software must accompany good hardware • Removal of deltas

  45. 7 things to avoid • Picking the wrong technology • Picking the wrong manufacturer($) • Not enough Quality Control • Bad design limiting operation • Noise in system • Treating sensor and hybrid separately • Bad analysis

  46. Summary • We have all the elements now to think about real detectors in real environments • design issues • noise problems • See how we design a detector for LHCb

More Related