1 / 30

HISTORY

HISTORY. 1999 : foundation of OOO «International Cargo Control» 2000 : foundation of ZAO «Baltic Control Vostok» 200 7 : foundation of «International Cargo Control-Ukraine» 2007 : foundation of ZAO «BCVG» (holding company)

nyoko
Download Presentation

HISTORY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. HISTORY 1999:foundation of OOO «International Cargo Control» 2000:foundation of ZAO «Baltic Control Vostok» 2007:foundation of «International Cargo Control-Ukraine» 2007: foundation of ZAO «BCVG» (holding company) 2009: ZAO «BCVG»has joined the Association of Russian Banks

  2. CUSTOMERS Raiffeisenbank UniCredit Bank MDM Bank People’s Bank of Kazakhstan Alfa Bank Société Générale BNP Paribas Russian Bank for Development Evrofinance Mosnarbank INVESTBANK and other Russian and foreign banks as well as banking investment companies.

  3. MAIN SERVICES • Supervision of goods and various property provided or proposed for pledge. • Monitoring of development projects (construction audit). • Evaluation of property.

  4. SUPERVISION OF PLEDGES: 1 Prior to loan issue After a loan is issued constant (daily or overnight) regular, at fixed intervals 2 2.1 2.2

  5. DETAILS THAT ARE ALWAYS AVAILABLE FOR A CUSTOMER: presence, value and quantity of goods kept in storage facilities of Borrower and belonging to Borrower; whether a Borrower observes or violates terms of pledge agreement as to maintenance of minimum balance and range of goods; any problems with documents relating to goods and the goods themselves; In most cases photographic survey of properties is undertaking and pictures made be used in reports.

  6. MONITORING OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS 1 Evaluation of investments in construction: amount of investments; correspondence of works performed with project documentation. Regular monitoring of property/site expenditure of: purposeful expenditure of funds; ; check the compliance of actual performance of work with schedules of construction and of issue of loans; completed construction operations are as per project documentation (quality monitoring); all initial planning, project and estimate documentation is in place, complete and correct. 1.1 1.2 2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4

  7. DETAILS THAT ARE ALWAYS AVAILABLE FOR A CUSTOMER: status of construction documentation; current situation at site; whether funds are spent as per intended purposes and consistently with progress of construction; whether works and materials conform to design documentation; Reports are always accompanied with photographic materials.

  8. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE Group’s Resources: Head Office in Moscow. Offices in Saint-Petersburg, Human Resources Center in Voronezh. Groups of people working in large cities, industrial centers and ports. Over 70 employees including experts of various goods, evaluators and civil engineers.

  9. STATISTICS Just some figures (construction monitoring excluded) In 2008, total 8,720 inspections of pledged property were held, or at average 35 inspections per day. Geography: all of Russia. Aggregate value of property under supervision: over USD 3 billion. Breaches (apparent failures to meet requirements on minimal value of pledged property) have been identified in 2% of inspections. Total number of other violations: 4.5% of all inspections. Percentage of detected violations compared to the year 2007 has grown twice.

  10. PRINCIPLES Independency and objectivity. Avoidance of conflict of interests and pressure. Repeated inspections. Openness in customer relations. Confidentiality. Rotation. Expediency and purposefulness. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

  11. MEASURES TO AVOID CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS The Bank, in accordance with resolution of its credit committee or through other procedures, appoints a particular inspection company to conduct inspections and examinations, and never delegates this choice to a Borrower. Ideally, the Bank enters a bilateral agreement with an inspection company and pays for its services at the Bank’s own cost.

  12. 2 PLEDGE ASSOCIATED RISKS The subject of pledge is “paper subject” only due to: “vain” warehouse receipt, with no physical goods beyond; complexity of goods quantity and type identification (soft commodities). 2.1 1 The pledged property is in place but it does not satisfy a Creditor for whatever reasons including any of the following: The pledge is multiple. The pledge is overestimated. The pledge is non-calculable or non-evaluable. Storage conditions of pledged property bear high risk of loss (of quality, or pledged property in total). The Pledge cannot, or will take excessive costs to be, put into circulation (monetized). 2.2 1.1 3 Willful fraud: Mysterious disappearance: a pledge has been there in place with proper quantity and value, but then suddenly and mysteriously disappeared (from warehouse with its seal unbroken, or in transit). Falsification of inspection company’s reports. 1.2 1.3 3.1 1.4 3.2 1.5

  13. 2 PLEDGE ASSOCIATED RISKS The subject of pledge is “paper subject” only due to: “vain” warehouse receipt, with no physical goods beyond; complexity of goods quantity and type identification (soft commodities). 2.1 1 The pledged property is in place but it does not satisfy a Creditor for whatever reasons including any of the following: The pledge is multiple. The pledge is overestimated. The pledge is non-calculable or non-evaluable. Storage conditions of pledged property bear high risk of loss (of quality, or pledged property in total). The Pledge cannot, or will take excessive costs to be, put into circulation (monetized). 2.2 1.1 3 Willful fraud: Mysterious disappearance: a pledge has been there in place with proper quantity and value, but then suddenly and mysteriously disappeared (from warehouse with its seal unbroken, or in transit). Falsification of inspection company’s reports. 1.2 1.3 3.1 1.4 3.2 1.5

  14. ARRANGEMENTS TO PREVENT VIOLATIONS OF PLEDGE AGREEMENTS: 1 2 Preliminary inspections. Recurrent and continuing supervision of pledged property. • to be conducted prior to grant of loan • and aimed to check: • availability and quality of the commodity; • all necessary documentation; • conformity of property actually available • to the List provided to the Bank; • proper storage conditions. to be carried out as per loan terms and Pledge Agreement to check: availability and quality of the commodity; all necessary documentation relating to commodity and titles; conformity of commodity actually available to the List of pledge provided to the Bank; conformity of commodity to the fixed minimal value of pledge; satisfaction of storage conditions. 1.1 2.1 1.2 2.2 1.3 2.3 1.4 2.4 A Customer will be notified upon each inspection. 2.5

  15. RESULTS OF WORK: 1 Detailed report of inspection specifying quantity and value of property, and describing commodity flow for the reported period. Identification of problems: overestimation of pledge; pledge non-calculable or non-assessable, or associated with high risk of loss; shortage, deficiency of pledge; non-conformity to storage conditions. Improvement of Storage and Accounting Procedures. 2 3

  16. 2 RISKS OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS: Technological: • improper quality of construction • operations; • use of materials not corresponding • to the project requirements; • change of project during construction; • noncompliance with schedule of • construction; construction • without project documentation, • clear costs and schedule (“at sight”). 2.1 1 2.2 Financial: • overestimation or underestimation of construction costs (and resulting increase of costs during construction); • unpurposed or unreasonable use of funds; • construction without design and estimate documentation, clear costs and schedule (“at sight”). 2.3 1.1 2.4 1.2 3 Other risks (legal, technical, ecological etc.) 1.3 are inspected indirectly during checking of project documentation and initial planning permits (“IPP”) for completeness.

  17. ARRANGEMENTS 1 Regular visit to the building site and visual inspection of construction, identification of problems, collection of documents. Review of initial planning permits. Review of design and estimate documentation. Review of contracts, subcontracts and addendums to them. Review of work performance statements. Review of hidden works statements. Review of materials quality certificates. Accounting and analysis of pay-roll records due under contracts and subcontracts; 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

  18. RESULTS OF WORKS 1 Determination of the amount of performed work. Calculation of funds actually spent. Determination correspondence of funds actually spent to works actually performed. Determination of compliance of performed work with design/project solutions and standards (quality inspection). Identification of unpurposed or unreasonable use of funds. Determination of compliance of construction work with the approved schedule. 2 3 4 5 6

  19. CONCLUSIONS The Bank’s use of professional inspection company: 1 Serves for the Bank and its employees as a proper interface for communication and understanding of processes in highly specialized areas. Provides orderly and transparent keeping of collaterals or construction records. Reduces a risk of being involved in fraud. Disciplines a Borrower. Assists the Bank in learning more of its Customers and their businesses. Povides the Bank’s interested departments with the qualitative information on the state of affairs. 2 3 4 5 6

More Related