120 likes | 253 Views
A Comparison Between Sub-threshold and Adiabatic Power Saving Techniques. By Jonathan Bolus and Stuart Wooters. Carry Look Ahead Adder. Power Comparison of different V DD. Power Consumption Comparison with VDD=1. Sub-threshold Summary. Energy Consumption: 7.18 fJ/addition f = 20 MHz
E N D
A Comparison Between Sub-threshold and Adiabatic Power Saving Techniques By Jonathan Bolus and Stuart Wooters
Sub-threshold Summary • Energy Consumption: 7.18 fJ/addition • f = 20 MHz • Power Consumption: 143.6 nW • Number of Devices: 1230
ECRL Efficient Charge Recovery Logic Essentially Differential Cascode Voltage Switch Logic (DCVSL). VDD replaced by power clock:
Adiabatic Adder Summary • Energy Consumption: 300 fJ/addition • f = 20 MHz • Power Consumption: 6 uW • Number of Devices: 1208
Conclusions • Adiabatic is not as affective at small values of VDD (lower than 2V). This is evident in the 90nm technology we used. • Sub-threshold saved 26x the power compared to VDD=1
References • A 0.5V, 400MHz, V/sub 00/-hopping processor with zero-V/sub TH/ FD-SOI technology Kawaguchi, H.; Kanda, K.; Nose, K.; Hattori, S.; Dwi, D.; Antono, D.; Yamada, D.; Miyazaki, T.; Inagaki, K.; Hiramoto, T.; Sakurai, T.; Solid-State Circuits Conference, 2003. Digest of Technical Papers. ISSCC. 2003 IEEE International 2003 Page(s):106 - 481 vol.1 Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/ISSCC.2003.1234227 • An Efficient Charge Recovery Logic Circuit Yong Moon, and Deog-Kyoon Jeong; IE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Vol, 31, No.4, April 1996