370 likes | 514 Views
Computer Simulations on Interior Access Vehicles for Emergency Evacuation. Hae Chang Gea Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Rutgers University, New Jersey, USA Program Manager: Dr. Mac McLean, FAA, CAMI. Aircraft Emergency Evacuation.
E N D
Computer Simulations on Interior Access Vehicles for Emergency Evacuation Hae Chang Gea Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Rutgers University, New Jersey, USA Program Manager: Dr. Mac McLean, FAA, CAMI
Aircraft Emergency Evacuation • Grouped Passenger Behaviors During Emergency Evacuation (Cabin Safety I: 10:30-11:00AM) • Aircraft Emergency Evacuation Study with Injured Passengers (Cabin Safety II: 2:30-3:00PM) • Computer Simulations on Interior Access Vehicles for Emergency Evacuation (Cabin Safety II: 4:30-5:00PM) Simulations can… • study many what-if scenarios; • incorporate various hazardous conditions; • evaluate the impact of new devices; • better understanding of the entire evacuation process.
Emergency Evacuation Simulations Type C Type 3 Type C Type A Type A Type 3
Evacuation Simulation Modeling • Passengers • are not fully aware of the status of the vehicle, • tend to stay in a decided direction unless other direction shows a significant advantage, • are free to make their own decision on which door to go to and may change direction at any time based on the evacuation condition. • Simulations • need to find the best direction to move, • need to update all calculations constantly.
Cost Function Calculation Door Speed (DS) Passenger Speed (PS) Distance1 (d1) Route Speed(RS) Oct. 26, 2010 P. 6
Cost Function Calculation Distance1(d1) Distance2(d2) Cost0 Cost1 Cost2 Oct. 26, 2010 P. 7
Cost Function Calculation Oct. 26, 2010 Waiting will also increase cost of evacuation • When a passenger is blocked by other passengers, additional waiting cost is added to the cost function. P. 8
Cost Function Calculation Finding shortest pathfrom a to b (1-3-6-5) Oct. 26, 2010 Dijkstra’s algorithm: Calculate all possible paths and their costs. P. 9
Cost Function Calculation Oct. 26, 2010 Cost and Path of each node: 1. Calculate costs from node to all exits; 2. Locate the exit with the lowest cost; 3. Define path direction. P. 10
Cost Function Calculation Oct. 26, 2010 Oct. 26, 2010 Cost and Path in each aisle: 1. Calculate costs for different directions; 2. Determine path direction from the minimum cost. P. 11 P. 11
Cost Calculation Algorithm Cost and Path between seats: 1. Calculate costs for different directions; 2. Determine path direction based on the minimum cost. Oct. 26, 2010 P. 12
Interactions between Passengers Oct. 26, 2010 At the intersection:1. Get costs of all passengers at the intersection;2. Passenger has the lowest cost will move first;3. Update all passengers and start again. P. 13
Model Calibration WIDE BODY NARROW BODY
Interior Intervention Vehicles for Emergency Evacuation
Interior Intervention Vehicle • Objective • To aid in passenger evacuation; • To initiate an effective rescue and fire suppression.
Red door opens at 0 sec. (69 sec.) • Red door opens after 30 sec. (81 sec.) • Baseline comparison (69 sec.) Type C Type C Type 3 Type C Type C Type C Type 3 Type C Type C Type 3 Type C
Single Aisle Vehicle Conf. 1 Conf. 2 Conf. 3 Conf. 4 Conf. 5 Conf. 6
Single Aisle Vehicle Conf. 7 Conf. 8
Single Aisle Vehicle Conf. 7 Conf. 8 Conf. 9 Conf. 10
Single Aisle Vehicle Conf. 7 Conf. 8 Conf. 9 Conf. 10 Conf. 11 Conf. 12
Single Aisle Vehicle Conf. 7, 8 Conf. 9, 10 Conf. 11,12 Conf. 13 Conf. 14
Single Aisle Vehicle • The IIV will have little effect if it is used to reopen an exit when another exit in the same section is functional in single aisle aircraft. • the IIV can maximize its impact on the reduction of the total evacuation time by deploying it to an exit where no exit is operational in the same section. Conf. 1 Conf. 14
Single Aisle Vehicle Conf. 15 Conf. 16
Single Aisle Vehicle Conf. 17 Conf. 18
Single Aisle Vehicle Conf. 15 Conf. 16 Conf. 17 Conf. 18
Single Aisle Vehicle Conf. 15 Conf. 16 Conf. 17 Conf. 18
Single Aisle Vehicle Conf. 15 Conf. 16 Conf. 17 Conf. 18
Double Aisle Vehicle Conf. 1 Conf. 4 Conf. 6 Conf. 7 Conf. 8 Conf. 5 Conf. 3 Conf. 10 Conf. 2 Conf. 9 Conf. 11 Conf. 16 Conf. 12 Conf. 15 Conf. 18 Conf. 14 Conf. 17 Conf. 13
Double Aisle Vehicle Conf. 1 Conf. 2 Conf. 3 Conf. 4 Conf. 5 Conf. 6 Oct. 26, 2010 P. 32
Double Aisle Vehicle Conf. 7 Conf. 8 Conf. 9 Conf. 10 Conf. 11 Conf. 12 Conf. 13 Conf. 14 Oct. 26, 2010 P. 33
Double Aisle Vehicle • For double aisle aircraft, the simulation showed that the IIV can reduce the total evacuation time on almost every evacuation configuration in double aisle aircraft. Conf. 1 Conf. 14
Double Aisle Vehicle Conf. 15 Conf. 16 Oct. 26, 2010 P. 35
Double Aisle Vehicle Conf. 17 Conf. 18 Oct. 26, 2010 P. 36
Conclusions • The choice of location for deployment of IIV is very important to reduce the overall evacuation time. • For single aisle aircraft, the IIV can maximize its impact by deploying it to an exit where no exit is operational in the same section. The IIV will have little effect if it is used otherwise. • For double aisle aircraft, the IIV can reduce the total evacuation time on almost every evacuation configuration. The time savings can be up to 30%. • For some extreme evacuation patterns, such as either front end or back end of the aircraft is completed blocked, passengers can still evacuate from the aircraft if the IIV can be deployed within 40 seconds.