180 likes | 331 Views
Evolving Approaches to Managing Governmental Real Property Assets . Olga Kaganova, CRE The Urban Institute, Washington, DC Okaganov@ui.urban.org For National Executive Forum on Public Property Sponsors’ Retreat 2003, November 6-8, Montreal, Canada. Contents.
E N D
Evolving Approaches to Managing Governmental Real Property Assets Olga Kaganova, CRE The Urban Institute, Washington, DC Okaganov@ui.urban.org For National Executive Forum on Public Property Sponsors’ Retreat 2003, November 6-8, Montreal, Canada
Contents • Background: The Urban Institute’s research, book, technical assistance, sponsors, and contributors • Pre-reform issues and reform drivers, context, and concepts • Some lessons learned from advanced reformers (central governments) • Methodology for municipal governments • What remains unclear (“big issues”) Olga Kaganova, Urban Institute
Sponsors of preceding research and the book (a partial list) The book is based on the results of projects sponsored by: • The World Bank • The Inter-American Bank • The US Agency for International Development • Treasury Board of Canada, Secretariat • The Urban Institute • Individual researchers With assistance from: • City of Saskatoon Olga Kaganova, Urban Institute
Book Managing Governmental Property Assets in the Time of Globalization: Search for Transferable Experience • Central governments’ property (Australia, Canada, New Zealand, France, and Singapore) • Municipal property (the USA, Switzerland, Eastern Europe and NIS) • Special critical components (information, corporations, and PPPs) • Lessons and “big issues” Olga Kaganova, Urban Institute
Common Issues of Pre-reform Asset Management • Fragmented management • Multiple inefficiencies(vacant and underused properties, forgone financial gains, not “highest and best use,” deferred maintenance and repair) • Lack of relevant information • Lack of transparency and accountability Olga Kaganova, Urban Institute
Reform Drivers and Context • “New public management (NPM)” • Recognition – in difficult fiscal and economic times - of potential financial and economic gains associated with governmental property holdings • Realization that real estate is a major component of overall public wealth • Reform of accounting and financial reporting in the governmental sector • Participation of real estate professionals in governments Olga Kaganova, Urban Institute
Conceptual Changes Underlying Reform • Government as “enabler” rather than “provider” of urban real estate • (i) Direct privatization of large property portfolios • (ii) Separation of ownership and management, and • (iii) Changing the role: “supplier” “partner” “enabler” Olga Kaganova, Urban Institute
Conceptual Changes Underlying Reform (cont’d) • Public real estate as productive assetvs. aspublic good • Corporate real property asset management as a prototype for governmental asset management Olga Kaganova, Urban Institute
Some Lessons from Advanced Reformers • What serves well as a trigger for reform? A special high-level report focused on the area of property asset management, which identifies serious problems and suggests reform directions – A, C 2. How do we overcome fragmentation and overlapping of institutional responsibilities and authorities? By targeted reform (especially an asset management reform) -by-design -A, C, F, NZ Olga Kaganova, Urban Institute
Some Lessons from Advanced Reformers (cont’d) 3. Which elements of regulatory framework seem to be important? a) Laws (only on a few key provisions) - A, C, F, NZ b) Explicit strategic principles of property asset management adopted by the government - A, C c) Authority and incentives for portfolio decision-makers (such line Ministers or Heads of program departments) to implement these principles in practice (example: own vs. lease) - A, C, NZ d) Effective safeguarding and controlling mechanisms (examples: an independent third party for property valuation; financial audit) - A, C, NZ Olga Kaganova, Urban Institute
Some Lessons from Advanced Reformers (cont’d) 4. What are mainstream international trends in central government’s asset management? • Significant reduction of ownership portfolios / clearance of central government balance sheets by: (1) divesting properties to lower tiers of government, and (2) privatizing property - A, C, NZ • Involvement of the private sector and professional associations in developing a regulatory framework, standards, guidance, etc. – A, NZ • Use of private sector’s asset management approaches and measurements (including market value, return on investment, expense ratios) - A, NZ Olga Kaganova, Urban Institute
Some Lessons from Advanced Reformers (cont’d) 4. What are mainstream international trends in central government’s asset management? (cont’d) d) Use of enterprise-type entities (governmental corporations) as holders and managers of some specialized portfolios - A, C, NZ • Use of private property and private property-related services for governmental needs (lease, PPPs, private management companies) - A, C, NZ • Recognition and accounting for full costs of governmental property ownership and use (all operating and management expenses, opportunity cost of property ownership (capital charge), property-related debt liabilities, and risks) - A, C (partially), NZ Olga Kaganova, Urban Institute
Some Lessons from Advanced Reformers (cont’d) 4. What are mainstream international trends in central government’s asset management? (cont’d) • Link of strategic planning for property needs with financial (capital and operating) planning -A, C, NZ, F (at an initial stage) • Use of effective positive incentives and market-based performance indicators for improving asset management - A, C, NZ • Use of relevant reporting and controlling mechanisms - A, C, NZ Olga Kaganova, Urban Institute
Some Lessons from Advanced Reformers (cont’d) 5. Which institutional arrangements work well? Varies 6. Which technical tools are used? • Standardized contracts of various types - A, C, NZ • Market-based property appraisal for both property transactions and bookkeeping - A, C (for transactions only), NZ • Financial and/or cost-benefit analysis of investment projects, using private sector instruments (such as Net Present Value) - A, C, NZ Olga Kaganova, Urban Institute
Some Lessons from Advanced Reformers (cont’d) 6. Which technical tools are used? (cont’d) d) Accrual accounting and associated forms of financial reporting - A, C (partly), NZ e) Cost recovery instruments (rent from tenants at governmental properties and a capital charge on holders of governmental properties) - A, C (partly), NZ • Performance and budget indicators, in particular based on private sector’s benchmarks – A, NZ • Financial incentives for agencies and individual managers – A, C, NZ Olga Kaganova, Urban Institute
Some Lessons from Advanced Reformers (cont’d) 6. Which technical tools are used? (cont’d) • Strategic asset and investment planning - A, C, NZ • Rigorous reporting requirements, including financial reporting within accrual accounting - A, C, NZ • Regular internal and external audits - A, C, NZ Olga Kaganova, Urban Institute
Municipal Asset Management: Denver Model Olga Kaganova, Urban Institute
“Big Issues” as Work in Progress • The relationship between accounting reform and asset management reform • The degree of separation of ownership and managementand proper governance for managing entities • Information systems Olga Kaganova, Urban Institute